Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
sqs
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
19 ms
·
211.
▲
by
sqs
7y ago
Sourcegraph CEO here. I see the doc mentions Sourcegraph for code search (cool!). Something like ripgrep is indeed better for your case, a single person who just needs to search code in local directories on their own machine. I made a PR fo
212.
▲
by
sqs
7y ago
He works at Stripe, which is a financial technology company (goal is to increase the gdp of the Internet).
213.
▲
by
sqs
7y ago
I would also recommend dev tools founders (really any founder) read GitLab’s company handbook at https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/ , especially the sales and marketing sections. It’s awesome how public they are about h
214.
▲
by
sqs
7y ago
Sorry about that. There must’ve been a brief blip during a moment of intense load or a redeploy. Is it working for you now?
215.
▲
by
sqs
7y ago
URL to same code search on Sourcegraph (which works): https://sourcegraph.com/search?q=repo%3Awebkit%2Fwebkit+malw... (Disclaimer: I am the Sourcegraph CEO.)
216.
▲
by
sqs
7y ago
Sourcegraph CEO here. I came across a product here on HN that is helping with the problem of being a maker at a company with meetings. It’s called Meetter ( https://www.meetter.app/ ) and it lets you block off a specific hou
217.
▲
by
sqs
7y ago
Interesting. So it caches the authorized zipcards offline for this case, right? Why did it fail to unlock 50% of the time? If it failed, could you just retry, or did it fail 100% of the time in specific bad locations?
218.
▲
by
sqs
7y ago
The article cites awesome stats about the effectiveness of showing the results of static analysis at "diff time" (in code review) vs. outside the dev workflow. > For classes of bugs intended for all or a wide variety of enginee
219.
▲
by
sqs
7y ago
Do you believe static typing is harmful (to the type of company you want to join), or is this a personal preference (which is totally valid)? Honestly curious.
220.
▲
by
sqs
7y ago
What are the lessons you learned? And/or are the lesson plans available online? (And hi, Ben!! Your awesome holiday card is still up on our fridge. :)
221.
▲
by
sqs
7y ago
Sourcegraph CEO here. One data point: we’ve always been remote-friendly at Sourcegraph, and we’ve become remote-first. The vast majority of our recent hires on engineering and sales have been remote, and we even had 2 SF teammates decide to
222.
▲
by
sqs
7y ago
Agreed here. I have a 2-week-old and I (as a dad) found a ton of things to do to help.
223.
▲
by
sqs
7y ago
Sourcegraph CEO here. Yes, you can search forked repositories on Sourcegraph with regexp, exact terms, etc. Thanks for mentioning that! Here’s an example of a fork that you can search: https://sourcegraph.com/github.com/
224.
▲
by
sqs
7y ago
Why do you think Slack got built as it is today, and nobody built a similarly popular chat application bundled in every Linux package manager?
225.
▲
by
sqs
7y ago
What about Alaska and Hawaii?
226.
▲
by
sqs
7y ago
Sourcegraph CEO here. Congrats to the Kite team! As a desktop Linux user (Ubuntu and ChromeOS), I am excited to see this. How are you managing the maintenance of multiple editor extensions? Do you use some kind of architecture where there i
227.
▲
by
sqs
7y ago
Sourcegraph CEO here. Yes, we are very happy that the Go core team is taking over. I posted about this 7 months ago at https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18042930 . Language servers should be owned by the same core team th
228.
▲
by
sqs
8y ago
Thanks, did not know that!
229.
▲
by
sqs
8y ago
Ripgrep is awesome. Thank you for making it! In addition to being really fast, it "just works". By that I mean it automatically excludes the files I want to be excluded, like `.gitignore`d files and binary files. I know I can conf
230.
▲
by
sqs
8y ago
Thanks! GitHub actually does some of these things already. Do these solutions help/suffice? - Batching all comments in a single send: This is a core GitHub code review feature. You can send immediately by pressing the "Add single
231.
▲
by
sqs
8y ago
We (Sourcegraph) are interested in building an alternative to Critique at some point in the future, or at least enhancing existing code review tools to offer many of the favorite features of Critique. What are your favorite/must-have C
232.
▲
by
sqs
8y ago
Sourcegraph CEO here. Cool to see we are listed as a CodeSearch alternative. We assembled some links to Google internal docs and studies about how they use their Google internal CodeSearch tool. See the links at the top of https:/
233.
▲
by
sqs
8y ago
HashiCorp is doing VERY well revenue-wise. They are not struggling. Where did you hear they are struggling? (I have no affiliation with HashiCorp.)
234.
▲
by
sqs
8y ago
Sourcegraph CEO here. Thanks for mentioning us! BTW, we are Sourcegraph.com (not .org...we will see who's squatting on that domain). And our plan for doing this (high-level) is https://about.sourcegraph.com/plan .
235.
▲
by
sqs
8y ago
First, get your tooling set up, especially a code search tool with go-to-definition and find references. A good code search tool will make you much faster and better at understanding code, finding correct usages, debugging problems, etc. It
236.
▲
by
sqs
8y ago
Sourcegraph CEO here. Happy to answer any questions! I know we have a lot of users who also visit HN. :)
237.
▲
Sourcegraph 3.1 Released – Easier Code Search, Better Code Intel
(about.sourcegraph.com)
24 points
by
sqs
8y ago
|
1 comments
238.
▲
by
sqs
8y ago
Sourcegraph CEO here. Thank you for pointing out that the way we embed our architecture diagram was better before for screen reader users. Sorry for the regression. I filed an issue at https://github.com/sourcegraph/sou
239.
▲
by
sqs
8y ago
It is in a repository: https://github.com/langserver/langserver.github.io . We try to keep it up to date but rely on authors and PRs, too. We’ll do an audit (and if you see any outdated ones, please let us know). BTW, I
240.
▲
by
sqs
8y ago
My recommendation was not solicited, for the record. I read HN, saw the domain, recognized it was Kevin, and posted entirely on my own. (I agree with your reply!)
More ›