sqs

49 ms·

511.
by sqs 12y ago
Thanks for posting this. Just fixed the download links. What do you think of the new installation section on the homepage, at https://srclib.org/#install ?
512.
by sqs 12y ago
Oh, that is fantastic!
513.
by sqs 12y ago
We would love to have Windows support in srclib, but we honestly have no idea what (or how much effort) it would take. It might work in Cygwin as-is. If you or anybody else wants to try it, or at least identify issues, we would help. One re
514.
by sqs 12y ago
Thanks for the kind words! Please send feedback/complaints. Re: the name "srclib", I was on the phone with our domain registrar when we got srclib.org/com, and the rep referred to it as "Sr. Clib" (as in "
515.
by sqs 12y ago
Yeah, truly interactive editing and incremental updates are something that srclib doesn't handle right now. We have some plans/prototypes around using presentation compilers, lenient parsers, and a persistent "src" proce
516.
by sqs 12y ago
Yeah, pfff seems very cool. It seems that pfff has written parsers and type inferencers for a variety of languages in OCaml. That is an impressive achievement. For srclib, we are way lazier. We try to use existing libraries (written in the
517.
by sqs 12y ago
None of the original contributors use vim, so we wouldn't make a very good plugin for it. We'll help anyone who wants to make one, feature them on srclib.org (obviously), etc. Do you know anybody who'd be interested in making
518.
by sqs 12y ago
I wasn't able to find the source code for some of IntelliJ's dynamic language support, like Python and Ruby. If it is indeed open source, I would love to check it out. IntelliJ is awesome. We're just trying to make something
519.
by sqs 12y ago
We haven't looked at llvm yet. None of the tools for the existing languages we've targeted so far (Python, JavaScript, Go, and Ruby) had llvm-based tools that we chose to use. It would be AWESOME to hook it up to llvm. We'll
520.
by sqs 12y ago
Simplicity and lack of time. :) We'd love to move to something more language-agnostic for the schema definitions. If you're interested, we'd definitely accept a patch.
521.
by sqs 12y ago
Thanks for posting this! I'm one of the original creators. It's still alpha, so there will be bugs. But it can do some pretty cool and useful stuff already in your editor (and it powers https://sourcegraph.com/ ).
522.
by sqs 12y ago
My bias is to doubt that, but I could be convinced by data. Do you have any evidence that such usage is deliberate?
523.
by sqs 12y ago
Add a link to packdog.com so we can see it! I had to scroll to the bottom. Otherwise, great post!
524.
Show HN: Browse GitHub code like an IDE (Chrome extension screencast)(youtube.com)
2 points by sqs 12y ago|0 comments
525.
by sqs 12y ago
I'm one of the creators of this and am happy to answer questions (and get feedback).
526.
Browse code on GitHub like you're in an IDE(sourcegraph.com)
8 points by sqs 12y ago|1 comments
527.
Kenton Varda's (Protobuf and Cap'n Proto inventor) LAN party-optimized house(kentonsprojects.blogspot.com)
3 points by sqs 12y ago|1 comments
528.
Torment Claims Make GitHub Grow Up(online.wsj.com)
1 points by sqs 12y ago|0 comments
529.
by sqs 12y ago
How does this relate to Filecoin? http://filecoin.io/ http://filecoin.io/filecoin.pdf
530.
by sqs 12y ago
Hmm, interesting. I'll follow up with you by email. Thanks for reporting this.
531.
by sqs 12y ago
Not too negative. We love hearing from people who use Sourcegraph. :) Which page was it, and does it take that long every time you load that page? We have improved average page load time a lot (it's now 200-500msec), but we're see
532.
by sqs 12y ago
Or link directly to functions on Sourcegraph, if you are referring to a function and not just a line range. Like https://sourcegraph.com/code.google.com/p/go/.GoPackage/net/... . (Full disclosure: I&
533.
Show HN: Finding live usage examples of Python and Django functions(youtube.com)
2 points by sqs 12y ago|0 comments
534.
by sqs 12y ago
Yeah, it's almost all open source now and we're releasing the last bits (plus the coordination code) between now and next week. We will post another article when it's ready next week. Email me at sqs at sourcegraph.com in the
535.
by sqs 12y ago
We chose Go because it offers amazing facilities for introspecting its own source code, such as go/doc ( http://golang.org/pkg/go/doc/ and https://sourcegraph.com/code.google.com/p&#x
536.
by sqs 12y ago
Oh, thanks for posting this! I'm the author (and one of the co-creators of Sourcegraph at https://sourcegraph.com ), and I'm happy to answer any questions anyone has here.
537.
by sqs 12y ago
This is full static analysis, with AST and type inference. However, type inference on JavaScript is quite hard, and as you've seen, our analyzer fails on many complex libraries like d3. We have an open issue about fixing d3 support at
538.
by sqs 12y ago
This looks really cool. Looking forward to trying it out.
539.
by sqs 12y ago
I fixed this issue, but it'll take a while to propagate as Sourcegraph rebuilds all libraries that contain minified JS files. Thanks for reporting it.
540.
by sqs 12y ago
Yes, it was for Ruby, and we will reenable it once Ruby support is back in. Sorry for the disruption.

More ›