Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
sq_
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
23 ms
·
241.
▲
by
sq_
7y ago
Impressed that an 8350 lasted you that long at a reasonable performance level. An R5 1600 for $79 is definitely an awesome deal; mine still crushes pretty much any work I throw at it.
242.
▲
by
sq_
7y ago
Hah! I almost bought that board, but ended up going with another for built-in wifi. Asrock has been a really solid brand for me.
243.
▲
by
sq_
7y ago
Seems plausible. The build my R5 1600 is in has a reasonably high-end Asrock X370 mobo. Is your setup similar?
244.
▲
by
sq_
7y ago
I’m not sure if I’m some weird exception, but I’ve never had issues running Linux at long uptimes on my R5 1600 box.
245.
▲
by
sq_
7y ago
Thanks for the explanation!
246.
▲
by
sq_
7y ago
I find it interesting that he mentions gravitons as a definite piece of particle physics, on the same order as photons, etc. I was under the impression that gravitons were simply one part of one possible conception of quantum gravity, and t
247.
▲
by
sq_
7y ago
For anyone who hasn't seen it, Scott's video on Chernobyl is also well worth a watch: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q3d3rzFTrLg
248.
▲
by
sq_
7y ago
Was Apple mentioned somewhere in the slide deck that Anandtech has as the second part of the article? Or was it in a video version of the presentation? Super interested by what you're saying here.
249.
▲
by
sq_
7y ago
And will be charging ~$90 million per seat versus SpaceX's $55 million per seat or the Russian Soyuz's $84 million per seat. https://arstechnica.com/science/2019/11/nasa-report-finds-bo...
250.
▲
by
sq_
7y ago
If I remember correctly, it was cell phone video taken by someone in the control room at the time of the test.
251.
▲
by
sq_
7y ago
According to space Twitter, yes, that is correct. Atlas and Centaur both performed nominally. Edit: looks like Tory Bruno (ULA CEO) has confirmed that Atlas and Centaur performed well [0] [0] https://twitter.com/planet4589&#
252.
▲
by
sq_
7y ago
Wow. I just watched that one and his toilet paper moonshine video. I can’t believe he’s doing all of this in a home lab!
253.
▲
by
sq_
7y ago
> DDG, Startpage and such, on the current instantiation, they are proxies to someone else search-backend. Does this remain true for DuckDuckGo? I was under the impression that they used to be that way, but that they had switched over to
254.
▲
by
sq_
7y ago
From an earlier article on the same site [0]: > The payload area is roughly a foot and a half long and let's say the swords are roughly the same length, this would provide about a three and a half foot diameter kill zone, which is s
255.
▲
by
sq_
7y ago
There was definitely a huge amount of controversy over this after the first Starlink launch. If I'm remembering correctly, the problems got significantly better after the satellites moved to their final orbits and oriented their sola
256.
▲
by
sq_
7y ago
After the first Starlink launch, Musk made a number of comments about being willing to experiment with launching some telescope-equipped Starlink sats since they expect the per-sat costs to be so low. If you had dozens to hundreds up there,
257.
▲
by
sq_
7y ago
The ones that flew today were fished out of the water after the Arabsat-6A mission. The two that they've caught with the boats were from STP-2 and Amos-17. Apparently they're going to attempt to go fish these ones out, too, since
258.
▲
by
sq_
7y ago
AMD seems to be doing very well with their non-monolithic CCX setup for Zen, especially now that Zen 2 has fixed up some of the earlier issues with inter-core and inter-CCX communication. Intel has definitely had plenty of time to refine th
259.
▲
by
sq_
7y ago
I think it's more about the principle of the thing. It's definitely a bad thing to have satellites up there that no one knows are there (because of collision risks, etc.), and the US not registering theirs opens the door for other
260.
▲
by
sq_
7y ago
It'll definitely be interesting to see if they do. If I remember correctly, there were some articles with recent Xeon chips about how their monolithic design was hurting them pretty badly on yields.
261.
▲
by
sq_
7y ago
Back in 2016-17, around Skylake/Kaby Lake, I remember getting all excited with some friends about the prospect of Intel 10nm, which they were saying would be used for their immediately upcoming series of chips. Now that it's 2019
262.
▲
by
sq_
7y ago
I think the important part is the "spooky factor" of "this highly maneuverable space plane can stay on orbit for two years doing who knows what". The implication is that the US military has a vehicle that can stay on orb
263.
▲
by
sq_
7y ago
I mean, it seems like any drone cheap enough to be expendable by the millions would probably be lacking enough in range as to need a carrier/mothership of some sort.
264.
▲
by
sq_
7y ago
> My money's on a commercial program like they one they've been doing for ISS resupply. Fully agree. If I had to bet right now, I would guess that SpaceX will get humans to the moon before NASA does. They’re moving so quickly o
265.
▲
by
sq_
7y ago
Interesting. I'm kinda down on Artemis overall, as it seems like the whole thing is getting bogged down in political maneuvering, as usual. NASA keeps saying it's more than boots on the ground, but all the plans they announce seem
266.
▲
by
sq_
7y ago
If memory serves, things usually drop towards MSRP within a month or two for AMD. Hopefully that'll happen with these.
267.
▲
by
sq_
7y ago
AMD's included coolers are one of my favorite little "bonus" things about buying their chips. As you said, Intel's stock coolers are known for being loud , aren't actually too great at dissipating heat, and aren&#x
268.
▲
by
sq_
7y ago
> which will almost certainly be used on any crewed mission to Mars. This is interesting. I hadn't seen anything about NASA plans to get humans to Mars requiring nuclear-thermal propulsion. Does NASA even currently have a serious pl
269.
▲
by
sq_
7y ago
That sounds awesome. If you don’t mind, could you talk about what you did some more?
270.
▲
by
sq_
7y ago
> If you want stricter emissions standards, fine. But figure out how to do it through the federal government, and not via a side channel. I agree that it would be better if this was federal, but if the federal government cannot or will n
More ›