spyckie2

51 ms·

451.
by spyckie2 11y ago
No. There is a scoring heuristic that AI programs use to determine if they are winning or not - ie: +2 stone ahead, -2 stones behind, etc. (Note: I don't actually know what the real heuristic is, I'm making it up). A computer wil
452.
by spyckie2 11y ago
1-10 you memorize. 13-100 you calculate it out. 100+ you use a calculator. 11-12 is half memorized/half calculated. I think of them as introducing you to how to calculate with larger numbers you haven't memorized. Some of them you
453.
by spyckie2 11y ago
Every note taker I've found gets the building block unit wrong. The building block unit shouldn't be stylized text with media - it should be content that is digested and summarized. Quotes from books. Summarized web pages - either
454.
by spyckie2 12y ago
I tried Inbox, really tried to love it, eventually switched back. It's something about how it sorts or arranges your mail in non-chronological order that really messes with my way of finding things. Also only being able to see 7 emails
455.
by spyckie2 12y ago
While predictive techniques can help, you really want something that is accurate 100% of the time so you don't have to keep an eye on your output. I'd rather memorize two different chords to get 100% correctness on the I or eye pr
456.
by spyckie2 12y ago
As someone who has always been fascinated with alternative typing systems and shorthand, I took a look at Plover and Steno a couple of months ago. I bought myself an NKRO Keyboard - haven't turned it into a permanent STENO keyboard yet
457.
by spyckie2 13y ago
You can add a simple heuristic to the scoring to increase the win rate by a lot - weighted corners. Add the logged value of the numbers on the corners to the score and the higher numbers will tend to 'stick' to them. This also ser