spoiler

145 ms·

1201.
by spoiler 14y ago
Soon: Eureka (as seen on SySf).
1202.
by spoiler 14y ago
I gues it could be because + infront of an empty array returns 0. So, when you do !+[] you get 1. What you pasted it a bit of a labyrinth, but if someone bothered to keep track of it, they could definitely find ten 1s in there. It's not why
1203.
by spoiler 14y ago
Oh, I've seen it, but it didn't cross my mind. However, I knew before that Array + <something> will give you a String (with the members of that array delimited by a comma) followed by <something> cast into a String. I don't
1204.
by spoiler 14y ago
My mum would have probably lock me in a cupboard... Still would, actually. :(
1205.
by spoiler 14y ago
I know this might be a little unorthodox, but I met mine on a strange chat that was hip on the 90ies. Granted, never met anyone like that again, ever. Also, she is my girlfriend, too (if that counts for anything).
1206.
by spoiler 14y ago
Technically, you agree with Microsoft, not the other way around. Also, I don't see what the big problem of chocolatey installing where it does. Cygwin, MinGW, Python, Ruby and others do it, too? The default is in c:/chocolatey/. Oddly, ch
1207.
by spoiler 14y ago
> JavaScript just waiting for the next technology to come around and make it look like Perl does today: pervasive, but lacking enterprise adoption on large applications. How about CoffeeScript? Also, I worked on some pretty "big" JS pro
1208.
by spoiler 14y ago
I go to bed around 2am and 4am and get up at around 7:30am. It's probably unhealthy. :/
1209.
by spoiler 14y ago
I think you are not mediocre simply because you feel like you might be. Not sure if that makes sense. To explain: My mum insisted I see a psychiatrist since she was convinced I was depressed (turns out she was right), but in one of the sess
1210.
by spoiler 14y ago
In my experience the browsers that don't support these kinds of transitions are usually better left unanimated in java script; they usually run on older and slower computers. Also another reason why CSS transitions might be faster is becaus
1211.
by spoiler 14y ago
This is so stunningly true! I never actually thought about it, but with each passing sentence the light-bulb above my head grew brighter. I love the lead-glass reference. It's true, but I personally imagined it as building a large sand cast