Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
spoiler
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
28 ms
·
331.
▲
by
spoiler
3y ago
> > Json instead of XML > > This is both subjective and shows the lack of understanding that extensibility is, and how json only does 1/10 of what proper XML can do. Can you elaborate on this a bit more? Specifically what
332.
▲
by
spoiler
4y ago
Ah. These days I just use speech to text, with a combination of swiping sometimes and tapping for punctuation. I also don't to use my phone much anymore (since I reduced social media usage and disabled notifications). FWIW I think the
333.
▲
by
spoiler
4y ago
I'm someone who switched from SwiftKey (paid plan) to GBoard, and never looked back. I much prefer GBoard to SwiftKey. So it might be a matter of preference
334.
▲
by
spoiler
4y ago
I've written C++ for a long time, and I do agree that the language brings certain improvements over C. I think most people will agree with that. However, C++ can be incredibly frustrating to work with depending on the codebase. Overall
335.
▲
by
spoiler
4y ago
> they now want to talk about how “simple” and “beautiful” C is for no other reason than signaling how different you are from the zeitgeist? It sounds to me like they keep learning languages with the same illusions and failing to take an
336.
▲
by
spoiler
4y ago
Let me preface this with: there's a bit of bro-science in this, but it seems to work for me. I think the main component is that after I wake up, I have a normal warm shower, and after I rinse myself. However, then I turn to cold water.
337.
▲
by
spoiler
4y ago
Don't get me wrong, it's really cool technology, but calling the first example a "game" is... Grossly overstating what it is. However, given it was made by someone who's not a [game] developer, it's pretty cool
338.
▲
by
spoiler
4y ago
Thanks! I didn't know there were already ready made integrations for dev tooling
339.
▲
by
spoiler
4y ago
You're spot on. It's unfortunate we see crying as a weakness. Even machines need an outlet. Electronics need cooling; cars need an exhaust. So, it should be okay for humans to let it out, too.
340.
▲
by
spoiler
4y ago
I think it's more nuanced than that. I like to simplify these complex topics to myself by gamifying them a little. Imagine every time you make a conscious decision to do something you expend willpower points. You have a only a set numb
341.
▲
by
spoiler
4y ago
I was thinking of doing something similar, but was never sure what to use that many keys for. Can you provide a photo or list a few examples of what you're doing with yours? Thanks!
342.
▲
by
spoiler
4y ago
Some people use Macs for work. I guess you can think of it as a long-ish investment and get it on finance, but considering how quickly hardware becomes outdated in some industries where Macs are are either a technical or social must-have, t
343.
▲
by
spoiler
4y ago
Hmm. To me it seems like you maybe didn't get out of the new character instance. That thing is basically a 20-30 minute (depending on race) racial story instance. Those tend to have linear progression most of the time, and I think you
344.
▲
by
spoiler
4y ago
As someone who played RO for years... The similarities are exactly why I enjoyed GW2... Are you talking about the hearts or the events? The Achievements? The main difference is that the world the player experiences is more "coherent&qu
345.
▲
by
spoiler
4y ago
I think Google has a weird pathological case maybe. So, I'm not sure I would use them as a forecast. I think R&D is good in any company. Sure, the nature of R&D is that most of it is failure; that's just the way it is. AI
346.
▲
by
spoiler
4y ago
I'm a developer and a hobby artist. So I could br a bit off on the art front. For development: it's helped me adopt new libraries a bit quicker. It also helped with generating a first draft of documentation/comments, or to he
347.
▲
by
spoiler
4y ago
I know people like to politicise things since it usually creates a simple sense of unity and to gives people a sense of moral superiority. Simple is good. We humans like simple. If we didn't go and simplify things we don't deal wi
348.
▲
by
spoiler
4y ago
I think you're conflating imagination and creativity with taste. Your example might be cute and funny, but as you yourself alluded: it's completely bland and tasteless. It's maybe good enough for a "meme dump" but t
349.
▲
by
spoiler
4y ago
I've had to do something similar in a much shorter career as well (about 10 years or so). I think the rate of change is much quicker these days too. It was still always within the tech field, but for better or worse my career has been
350.
▲
by
spoiler
4y ago
Could you instead use AI to reduce drudgery in your work, or to iterate faster between ideas until you settle on a final peace? What if you have something in mind that is hard to prompt for, or the tool just refuses to generate what you had
351.
▲
by
spoiler
4y ago
A smart company will realise it's better to be 2x productive for the same money than to be at the same productivity for half the money.
352.
▲
by
spoiler
4y ago
Ah. I think it still requires you to understand what you're doing. I tried to use both copilot and ChatGPT 3.5 and 4. It doesn't get a lot of things right in my interest areas. I think it's great as a crazy-good autocompletio
353.
▲
by
spoiler
4y ago
I know what you mean, and it's kinda annoying. I often click the blog links knowing I'll probably be disappointed when I see they're certain sites. Personally hosted blogs tend to be a bit better. I wish they added some kind
354.
▲
by
spoiler
4y ago
I find this situation a bit funny. I agree with you on almost everything you said. I think the only part we maybe disagree is on the importance of style as a form of expression. I think style is a big part of it (or mixture of styles). To m
355.
▲
by
spoiler
4y ago
> You spent a lot of time deconstructing something I never said or implied. > The keyword you missed is "style". Your word, that I quoted. > > As in, "the style of that artist". I wasn't referring to in
356.
▲
by
spoiler
4y ago
I think this is a futile discussion. I think originality certainly exists, and I've seen it may times in the art world. I could be wrong, but you seem to imply originality is a made up concept? Do original thoughts even exist? Are our
357.
▲
by
spoiler
4y ago
Oh right, sorry. I was talking generally, not specifically to Firefly. Yeah, I think Adobe is a publisher and as such, you give it distribution rights. So, I agree with you on this case. Slightly tangential, but Imagine a singer or actor&#x
358.
▲
by
spoiler
4y ago
Ah, I had no idea that was protected too! That's good. I think the reason I was morally on the fence was that people already put blog posts out with the intent of sharing their knowledge with the rest of the Internet... So my assumptio
359.
▲
by
spoiler
4y ago
In the case of CVs/resumes, I've never liked LaTeX CVs when I encountered them... Most of the time they just looked horrible and messy. Or they were for some reason being rendered without anti-aliasing and text selection broken wh
360.
▲
by
spoiler
4y ago
I do! If they aren't in some way public domain, then the authors should have a say, or be if the work is purchased. I have a bit of cognitive dissonance on the subject of blog posts or articles in general, since those are kinda public
More ›