Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
spion
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
51 ms
·
511.
▲
by
spion
5y ago
Webpack does way more than esbuild, including running a typechecking compiler instead of just transpiling, running compilers able to downlevel emit to ES5 and providing a deep plugin architecture allowing you to hook into any bit you like.
512.
▲
by
spion
5y ago
I just wanted to add - for anyone that thinks the spread of viral false information isn't just as serious of a problem as lack of free speach is, I invite you to read this story https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1
513.
▲
by
spion
5y ago
And this way, they risk running afoul false advertising and class action lawsuits. Its not mentioned anywhere that the phone becomes dangerous to use after 3 years.
514.
▲
by
spion
5y ago
Which is why the solution is to write these blog posts to warn people off of buying any Google phones as they become dangerous after 3 years.
515.
▲
by
spion
5y ago
62x improvement is not achievable. 6.2x might be. edit: I see they are running it with 8 threads, in which case yes 50x is achievable. In any sizable codebase though, you should probably split into modules and run with some parallelism via
516.
▲
by
spion
5y ago
The good thing is you have a ton of code on the Internet to use to test it. Unlike a dynamic language reimplementation, a static language transpiler can check if the results produced are identical to `tsc`
517.
▲
by
spion
5y ago
I have some hope based on the development of awareness of "yellow press" ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yellow_journalism ). I don't see another solution that can reach "both sides".
518.
▲
by
spion
5y ago
This article is only half-right. Some of the other things you don't see because the algorithm doesn't promote them are: - scientists and educators that make 1 hour long videos to explain how something is incorrect. Example: https
519.
▲
by
spion
5y ago
The thing I find most baffling is that we have very good reason to believe [1] that HEPA air purifiers can keep the air clear of the virus, and yet they are barely talked about. In the UK we're still waiting on results from trials in s
520.
▲
by
spion
5y ago
You are right. The output they work towards is a longer lasting item (system).
521.
▲
by
spion
5y ago
The more likely explanation is that they originally formed teams to address this problem, teams that are now left with a choice between twiddling their thumbs and this.
522.
▲
by
spion
5y ago
I've never seen anyone have such strong opinions that seem to completely clash with what I have experienced reality to be. I'd love to see someone that says this take their own advice and build a business based on those principles
523.
▲
by
spion
5y ago
In my experience thats not true, but it does take education and cultural change to get there.
524.
▲
by
spion
5y ago
See Swift for a much more reasonable way to do error handling https://docs.swift.org/swift-book/LanguageGuide/ErrorHandlin...
525.
▲
by
spion
5y ago
What about `if err return err` everywhere?
526.
▲
by
spion
5y ago
Recursive replacement is somewhat of a WTF yes but not really in a causitive relationship ro this vulnerability, right? The main cause is the order in which ${} variables are evaluated. They are evaluated after substitution of `{}` in the f
527.
▲
by
spion
5y ago
Don't see why not. Evaluate the `${}` stuff first, then do the `{}` substitutions.
528.
▲
by
spion
5y ago
Theoretically you could have a benevolent tracking system You could show people who have problems with gambling ads about help workshops on how to quit gambling. You could reserve the gambling ads for people who haven't had fun in a wh
529.
▲
by
spion
5y ago
> Sometimes you get the job and when you start rolling questions and ideas, you get a "talk to the hand" followed by "that's now what you're here for". Why hire a senior person as a poster, if you're no
530.
▲
by
spion
5y ago
Given that this appears to be a page about a frequently asked question, I guess they have at least one.
531.
▲
by
spion
5y ago
There is, if you - don't focus on what their news sources are saying but instead - you focus on why the old way is bad in general (across both left and right news media). Thats the new message. Not "your news sources are bad"
532.
▲
by
spion
5y ago
Please, read the rest of my comment. The idea isn't to focus on any individual bit of misinformation. Its to throw away the whole thing, conceptually, as a bad way of getting information, as a low quality source of it. It might have to
533.
▲
by
spion
5y ago
You do realize that social media is responsible for quite a few of the problems we have had during the pandemic? People are dying because of social-media-amplified misinformation: https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1460
534.
▲
by
spion
5y ago
Twitter will amplify the most extreme positions on both ends, the ones to cause most outrage - Ban all guns, completely! - No restrictions on gun ownership should be allowed whatsoever, not even age limits! These cause the most outrage 
535.
▲
by
spion
5y ago
For what its worth, its highly likely that this comment had artificial negative points added in the background for its sorting, after which it stopped its super quick gain in points (156 in 1-2 hours) and suddenly dropped to page two. I won
536.
▲
by
spion
5y ago
> Explain what methodologies you'd do to stop these pieces of misinformation from spreading on Facebook, Twitter... or hell... Fox News / traditional media. Explaining that these sources of information are not reliable, because
537.
▲
by
spion
5y ago
Right, except now its not just pathological aspects of capitalism causing the problem - its democratized. Now everyone can misinterpret papers in novel an exciting ways that are likely to spread far and wide.
538.
▲
by
spion
5y ago
Lots of things will need to happen, I agree. One thing that is happening is that social media is escalating the problem so much that its becoming visible to everyone, which in turn will increase the demand to do something about information
539.
▲
by
spion
5y ago
We should have (software) systems that amplify our strengths and help us deal with our flaws, not the other way around.
540.
▲
by
spion
5y ago
Yes. While that situation was bad, it was not nearly as bad as the completely out of control results we get from social media. I actually think there is a great opportunity here to fix this problem as SM has made it painfully obvious and vi
More ›