Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
spandextwins
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
8 ms
·
31.
▲
by
spandextwins
3y ago
Aah, the memories! Glad there's emulators for most of these things, anyone can try them out virtually. Of course it ain't the same as pushing buttons on the real thing, but it's still fun!
32.
▲
by
spandextwins
3y ago
I'm sure it's different elsewhere.
33.
▲
by
spandextwins
3y ago
Nothing like poking machine code directly into memory, and when it crashes it takes the whole thing down and you lose everything. Learned really quick that way! Great times, part of why I've always enjoyed a deep understanding what
34.
▲
by
spandextwins
3y ago
Absolutely. Our experience with zfs dedupe was that it was ok for some workloads, like remote desktop stuff, but not for most, not worth the overhead. ZFS compression, on the other hand, was well worth the extra CPU time. But fdupes is grea
35.
▲
by
spandextwins
3y ago
This looks really neat, going to try it out. Lots of integrations, that's key.
36.
▲
by
spandextwins
3y ago
Not if they do it right. Lots of companies did that with us, some required it as part of their contract. We'd give them the ability to control or not, and what we were sharing with them. Way more efficient than sending up a tarball ful
37.
▲
by
spandextwins
3y ago
That thing was such an abomination, good riddance. Not sure what the heck HP and intel were thinking, yeah, have the compiler do the work of ordering instructions particularly crafty so it wouldn't stall. HP had PA-RISC at the time, ma
38.
▲
by
spandextwins
3y ago
I remember thinking why don't they just do a WebEx with us to see what's going on. Nope, never. They just wanted us to ship logs to them and try random crap until they closed the ticket. Total waste of time and money.
39.
▲
by
spandextwins
3y ago
It's enterprise in that you pay for it, but their support sucks. We had lots of open tickets they never solved. Total waste of money. Instead of fixing the problems they went back and forth with us asking for more log files until they
40.
▲
by
spandextwins
3y ago
It's not "kind of hidden" Redhat (and IBM) are choosing who to release their source code to, and if they don't like you they won't give it to you. Richard Stallman (rms) ain't dead yet.
41.
▲
by
spandextwins
3y ago
Yes, because everyone else figured it out except Red Hat (IBM)
42.
▲
by
spandextwins
3y ago
Anybody can do that with open source as long as they make the source code available. That shouldn't surprise anyone. Source code is free and open.
43.
▲
by
spandextwins
3y ago
It's open source. That's the deal.
44.
▲
by
spandextwins
3y ago
Great! Redhat and IBM can kiss my a*
45.
▲
by
spandextwins
3y ago
I love the video when the guy said you can drink the stuff, then when they said go ahead he refused.
46.
▲
by
spandextwins
3y ago
Yay! Haven't been able to use that since around 10 years ago! Welcome back, friend!
47.
▲
by
spandextwins
3y ago
Oh I remember Microport Unix from back in the day. It was pretty much always either a compiler big or an operating system bug. Same with Windows 3.11
48.
▲
by
spandextwins
3y ago
I was right, it's redhat docker.
49.
▲
by
spandextwins
3y ago
I'm a little confused, podman is just IBM docker, right?
50.
▲
by
spandextwins
3y ago
Sheldon? Sheldon is that you??
51.
▲
by
spandextwins
3y ago
And heat can make water evaporate without light! Wow!
52.
▲
by
spandextwins
3y ago
Where did the all the money go?
53.
▲
by
spandextwins
3y ago
Oracle says "hi" too! I remember seeing ads in Infoworld for a product called SQL*Calc. As far as I know it was fully vaporware, Oracle never even did anything past a photoshop (or more likely ms-paint) advertisement for it, but
54.
▲
by
spandextwins
3y ago
Now that is something great! I wish more of this kind of stuff existed. Instead of coding I'm writing comments here. I need to get back to writing great code too!
55.
▲
by
spandextwins
3y ago
Fragile but great work!
56.
▲
by
spandextwins
3y ago
Time to refactor the telescopes. They should do that anyway, Amazon is going to get into the same business soon.
57.
▲
by
spandextwins
3y ago
Because each fork on either end will grow the hairball by a factor of x where x is the other end of the hairball. What a mess.
58.
▲
by
spandextwins
3y ago
Docker actually solved this quite a while ago with tags and downloads of the correct architecture container. But this is interesting even though it won't scale well.
59.
▲
by
spandextwins
3y ago
No sauce?
60.
▲
by
spandextwins
3y ago
Nice! But next time do the press release when the product is released. Really tired of sites like HN pushing these stories out without any code or files Feels like vaporware.
More ›