spacebacon

5 ms·

31.
by spacebacon 4mo ago
Now do it without the fine tuning. https://github.com/space-bacon/SRT The HF zool4nd3r demo may be useful
32.
by spacebacon 4mo ago
No fine tuning required. You can use the SRT adapter. https://github.com/space-bacon/SRT
33.
by spacebacon 4mo ago
This one is and should be adapted to every frozen model ASAP. https://github.com/space-bacon/SRT Significantly improve every frozen model overnight. LFG.
34.
by spacebacon 4mo ago
Fair enough. Loose analogy straight from my own neuralese. Corrected.
35.
by spacebacon 4mo ago
Just an analogy that emphasizes reflexivity. Words and light in this case. Maybe a stretch?
36.
by spacebacon 4mo ago
It’s a really lossy process. Mostly due to most humans and all models treating sign meetings as determined at the moment of softmax crystallization. Signs (words included) are no more determined than the speed of light is. It’s all reflexiv
37.
by spacebacon 4mo ago
Both LLMs and most humans treat symbols as determined. Symbols are maps, not territory. LLMs just inherit our ignorance to this and stubborn attempts make circle from a square.
38.
by spacebacon 4mo ago
I agree.. Consider Math symbols and physical constants themselves are signs in a humans (or machines) interpretive system. They aren’t the actual thing, and treating them as precise blinds us to alternative interpretations. Conventional wis
39.
by spacebacon 4mo ago
They are semiotic infrastructure frozen in a state. We shouldn't keep pretending this is cognitive and using cognitive terms to frame. It’s incredibly stupid. Sorry to inform all of us computer scientist that semiotics has your milk.
40.
by spacebacon 4mo ago
Sure it does, it’s just a highly contested meaning that depends on a proper contemporary interpretation if to be received as intended in this context. Context that varies domain to domain. For the domain name buyer it’s quite different than
41.
by spacebacon 4mo ago
Yeah about that
42.
by spacebacon 4mo ago
Investors of both should read this: https://open.substack.com/pub/sublius/p/srt-introspect-why-c...
43.
by spacebacon 4mo ago
They are doomed. Publishing small wins while they can. https://open.substack.com/pub/sublius/p/srt-introspect-why-c...
44.
by spacebacon 4mo ago
And they could all see exactly why if they chose to. https://huggingface.co/spaces/RiverRider/srt-introspect
45.
by spacebacon 4mo ago
Round Trip Orbit
46.
by spacebacon 4mo ago
I get the feeling this car was designed inside and out with a css stylesheet.
47.
by spacebacon 5mo ago
I’m going to leave this here https://huggingface.co/spaces/RiverRider/srt-nla-av-v1-demo
48.
by spacebacon 5mo ago
I can't know how To hear anymore about tables
49.
by spacebacon 5mo ago
Unless it’s Ratty
50.
by spacebacon 5mo ago
Basket weaving is more human than conversation. Language is entry level artificial man.
51.
by spacebacon 5mo ago
The mods are terrible too. Getting anything to stick on reddit involves translating it precisely to that individual communities language. We all use the same vocabularies to speak incomprehensible languages at each other. If you cant speak
52.
by spacebacon 5mo ago
Yes… What have we done to entertainment?
53.
by spacebacon 5mo ago
Code switch at the token level. https://huggingface.co/spaces/RiverRider/zooL4nD3r-demo
54.
by spacebacon 5mo ago
Yes, it takes three to tango. https://github.com/space-bacon/SRT This repository empirically proves computational semiotics.
55.
by spacebacon 5mo ago
It does need to be and doing so is possible at 0 cost to CE. The SRT does just that. It actually improves the CE.
56.
by spacebacon 5mo ago
When I hear anything flash, home star runner comes to mind.
57.
by spacebacon 5mo ago
Related: https://github.com/space-bacon/SRT This repository empirically proves computational semiotics. The only “metacognitive” (2nd order) and metapragmatic (3rd order) model I’m aware of.
58.
by spacebacon 5mo ago
Attach the SRT to your frozen model Anthropic. Problem solved. https://github.com/space-bacon/SRT .
59.
by spacebacon 5mo ago
Shared skilled labor is another thing to consider.
60.
by spacebacon 5mo ago
This is the definition of convenience.

More ›