sosborn

91 ms·

931.
by sosborn 12y ago
>it makes team communication easy and painless on every device our employees own Is this sentence really that hard to understand?
932.
by sosborn 12y ago
When you are holding a camera, the intent is somewhat obvious. When you are holding a phone, not so much. That's the real separation.
933.
by sosborn 12y ago
evidence != proof He is simply stating that correlation can indicate a need to look deeper into the data, which is IMO true.
934.
by sosborn 12y ago
>College just isn't for some people. It's not a bad thing or a good thing. It's just a thing. This is really the best way to look at this.
935.
by sosborn 12y ago
It can be discouraging when a company with the resources of Google tries and fails.
936.
by sosborn 12y ago
Same here. It became the first game I avoided simply because I knew I would be wasting my money.
937.
by sosborn 12y ago
That's a pretty big claim. Any data to back it up?
938.
by sosborn 13y ago
>Bland, boring copy I don't disagree, but you should consider the fact that journalists are asked to convey complex information in as few words as possible and in a way that appeals to as wide an audience as possible. Things are gen
939.
by sosborn 13y ago
Right or wrong, many people interpret "no comment" as a sign of guilt.
940.
by sosborn 13y ago
>I see nothing bad in renting. The rub usually comes when you are older and your earning ability deteriorates. Those who own their house get a significant drop in monthly housing costs while those who are still renting to not. Some peopl
941.
by sosborn 13y ago
Not to be a dick, but as someone who lived and worked in Japan for about 10 years your hypothesis is totally wrong. The Japanese do many things well, but if you ever take a look at the software they produce you will realize very quickly tha
942.
by sosborn 13y ago
> I think that the answer has more to do with political unwillingness and lobbying than with lack of technology I think it is a bit less nefarious than that. The simple fact is that there is not a whole lot of demand for these services.
943.
by sosborn 13y ago
I fail to understand why people judge others for decisions like this.
944.
by sosborn 13y ago
Because we are the internet and they owe us everything.
945.
by sosborn 13y ago
> PS3 updates are unusually intrusive I totally agree with that statement, I just was taken aback by the word "constantly."
946.
by sosborn 13y ago
Constantly? http://us.playstation.com/support/systemupdates/ps3/history/
947.
by sosborn 13y ago
Ideas for stories are cheap. Fleshing those ideas out to a great story/film takes rare talent.
948.
by sosborn 13y ago
>still hold back for reasons that I simply don't understand I'm speculating, but in general the only thing that holds good technology back is an inability to scale manufacturing to the point where it is profitable.
949.
by sosborn 13y ago
Everything is subject to bias.
950.
by sosborn 13y ago
It was the iPod that device that really demonstrated the value of a halo product.
951.
by sosborn 13y ago
> all trades are overseen by the SEC Longterm goal?
952.
by sosborn 13y ago
Sounds like your issue is with DHH and not necessarily the copy.
953.
by sosborn 13y ago
>if there are patent-encumbered formats involved. Patents would not discourage manual conversion. I.E., a human looks at the old presentation and recreates it in the new software. I'm just not sure that there are any presentation wo
954.
by sosborn 13y ago
> loaded propaganda bullshit terms Totally. > MAFIAA > If we are to win this war > traitors Oh, I see. This only applies to them. Look, your basic point is solid but your presentation could use a little work.
955.
by sosborn 13y ago
To be fair, the earned income tax exemption is sufficiently large enough that you will be making six figures before you have to pay a penny in U.S. tax. You still have to file though.
956.
by sosborn 13y ago
>The real problem is with the paperwork and the penalties for screwing things up. When I lived abroad I just used a competent CPA. I'm not disagreeing with your statement, I'm just pointing out a viable solution.
957.
by sosborn 13y ago
That's simply not true. Public playing means that you cannot go to a part and project on a screen (as an example). In the confines of your home is not considered public playing.
958.
by sosborn 13y ago
But when you buy it you have a license to show it to 20 friends in a setting like that as long as you aren't charging (at least in the U.S.). You are creating situations for the sake of this argument that simply don't exist.
959.
by sosborn 13y ago
Which rental service requires that each person watching pays a separate fee? If the terms dictated something like that then I simply wouldn't rent from that service.
960.
by sosborn 13y ago
To me entertainment is very simple. The person who offers the entertainment presents a value. It is up to me whether or not the entertainment is worth the value. If it is, I'll pay the price, if it is not, then I will move on to one of

More ›