sonotathrowaway

7 ms·

31.
by sonotathrowaway 3y ago
He’s making sure the public is safe from misspent funds by keeping the funds in his personal bank account. Nothing to see here.
32.
by sonotathrowaway 3y ago
There’s a better chance they destroy the items and destroy the records of ownership of cash out of spite.
33.
by sonotathrowaway 3y ago
They pay exorbitant rents to politicians to retain that privilege. It’s less of an argument more of an avalanche of money.
34.
by sonotathrowaway 3y ago
Calling Hudson Yards and Times Square stagnant, risky investments is so ridiculous it becomes difficult to believe it’s being argued in good faith.
35.
by sonotathrowaway 3y ago
We build planes safely, but those same parts are 3x the cost. Safety isn’t the reason why it’s more expensive.
36.
by sonotathrowaway 3y ago
These types of responses always skip over the most crucial parts of history: The IDF originally funneled money to the founder of Hamas in order to weaken popular support for Fatah, and Netanyahu facilitated Qatari payments to Hamas when it
37.
by sonotathrowaway 3y ago
Monopsonistic*
38.
by sonotathrowaway 3y ago
The current size of the heloc (home equity line of credit) market is around 336 billion dollars.
39.
by sonotathrowaway 3y ago
The “police overreach” you are protesting is that a paramilitary group was not allowed to kidnap and execute a governor. The overreach in question is that the police were allowed to arrest and prosecute those people in full accordance with
40.
by sonotathrowaway 3y ago
Republicans endorse political violence when it’s targeted against their political opponents - the plot to kidnap and execute the Michigan governor was “just a joke” (the perpetrators have been convicted and are currently incarcerated).
41.
by sonotathrowaway 3y ago
When conservatives are used to feeling privileged, equality feels like oppression.
42.
by sonotathrowaway 3y ago
^ this reads like a terrorist supporter still trying to justify their support of terrorism. They’ve already been convicted, they’re in jail and will be for a few more years. You lost, get over it.
43.
by sonotathrowaway 3y ago
Both, actually
44.
by sonotathrowaway 3y ago
Is this more or less exploitive than the western powers? Shell will massacre villages that resist exploitation, how many massacres have the Chinese financed so far?
45.
by sonotathrowaway 3y ago
Censorship doesn’t inspire chilling effects without merit less punishments, so it was very necessary.
46.
by sonotathrowaway 3y ago
Your point is an incredibly aggressive intentional misrepresentation of what actually happened. Nobody actually believes that other than right wing fundie culture warriors. Elon Musk thinks it’s complete bullshit, as does every other person
47.
by sonotathrowaway 3y ago
Because it’s a loan they get to take out, interest free.
48.
by sonotathrowaway 3y ago
Saying that you absolve yourself of liability doesn’t excuse gross negligence though.
49.
by sonotathrowaway 3y ago
You’re being downvoted because it’s much easier than trying to refute it.
50.
by sonotathrowaway 3y ago
In Florida that’s a bonus, many of the prison officials are open members of the KKK.
51.
by sonotathrowaway 3y ago
To be fair it wasn’t his office that shielded him from consequences, it was his wealth. It’s not like a poor person who founded their own LLC would be coddled by the legal system.
52.
by sonotathrowaway 3y ago
I wasn’t aware of how true this is until I got to see larger companies up close. People are incredibly siloed and very incentivized to make the issue someone else’s problem - if you have a vendor you can shift the problem onto, even better.
53.
by sonotathrowaway 3y ago
He does not want the USA to regulate his company. He will lobby against every attempt to do so, he’s proposing a new agency specifically because it’s the most unwieldy proposal possible. This has been the tech playbook for close to two deca
54.
by sonotathrowaway 3y ago
What’s the point of buying a company and running it into the ground if you can’t cosplay as an engineer
55.
by sonotathrowaway 4y ago
If you read the article, it provides evidence that would support that theory
56.
by sonotathrowaway 4y ago
I wouldn’t count on a hardcore maga ideologue to give truthful testimony about anything, much less the crime in a liberal city. He’s more likely to say this was a coverup by the deep state than admit it wasn’t a random crime.
57.
by sonotathrowaway 4y ago
Irrelevant and misleading. By Twitter’s own guidelines it’s not a state owned publisher.
58.
by sonotathrowaway 4y ago
Matt Stoller would never let a fact get in the way of hating the Libs.
59.
by sonotathrowaway 4y ago
This is all true, but the idea is that you’re supposed to place your political ideology above the evidence based plans of doctors.
60.
by sonotathrowaway 4y ago
I’ve heard that the form of credit that is used is somehow inferior, such that it reflects badly when judging your credit history. I have absolutely no idea if that is true or how I’d even ascertain the veracity, so don’t quote me.

More ›