Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
someguynamedq
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
31.
▲
by
someguynamedq
24d ago
Authority is a heuristic for which claims are worthy of investigation, not determining their truth
32.
▲
by
someguynamedq
24d ago
This is pretty fuzzy and woo woo
33.
▲
by
someguynamedq
24d ago
Yes, and isn't it obvious why?
34.
▲
by
someguynamedq
24d ago
Also we are not discontinuous. Internet lines, satellites, pressure waves, etc.
35.
▲
by
someguynamedq
24d ago
The United States is not a geographical area, it is an abstract system of organization of humans that largely group together and make rules and modifications to about a geographic area. If all Americans cease to exist, can it really be said
36.
▲
by
someguynamedq
24d ago
The brain of a rabbit is many orders of magnitude closer to a human than the USA or a rock. Do you really think the specific form of human cognition is core to the definition of consciousness? This seems like an arbitrary place to draw the
37.
▲
by
someguynamedq
24d ago
I do not mean this in an insulting way whatsoever, but have you ever been evaluated for psychopathy? To me it is profoundly obvious that almost all humans are conscious.
38.
▲
by
someguynamedq
24d ago
The forms of consciousness we accept are, in the grand scheme of things, profoundly sensitive to disruption of their configuration. E.g. anything that physically reconfigures the brain sufficiently, including just a reduction in oxygen flow
39.
▲
by
someguynamedq
24d ago
There's nothing requiring consciousness in one arena to look/feel/be like consciousness in another. The United States could be "conscious," but that doesn't mean it wakes up in the morning and thinks "I ne
40.
▲
by
someguynamedq
25d ago
What do you define as AI
41.
▲
by
someguynamedq
25d ago
It's long
42.
▲
by
someguynamedq
26d ago
This is not confusing
43.
▲
by
someguynamedq
26d ago
The impressive part is that it is low latency enough to serve high quality answers at game speed through the model instead of a pre generated ad-hoc machine.
44.
▲
by
someguynamedq
26d ago
"can't hallucinate" feels like some word game Olympics
45.
▲
by
someguynamedq
26d ago
Presumably you have no social media then?
46.
▲
by
someguynamedq
26d ago
This is not typical
47.
▲
by
someguynamedq
26d ago
Exceedingly unlikely
48.
▲
by
someguynamedq
27d ago
The alternative now is the damage not being fixed and there being no ramifications/punishment
49.
▲
by
someguynamedq
27d ago
> current frontier models need laborious oversight and guardrails on even the simplest task As models advance, we shift the goalpost for what "simplest task" means. Before, "simplest task " meant "write a coheren
50.
▲
by
someguynamedq
28d ago
> Two agents will almost never hallucinate in the same way, regardless of their weights Citation needed
51.
▲
by
someguynamedq
28d ago
That's because they're massively wealthy and have teams of lawyers, not because of AI
52.
▲
by
someguynamedq
28d ago
This is the AI equivalent of a guy selling you a course. If it worked, it would be more profitable for them to use it than to sell it.
53.
▲
by
someguynamedq
29d ago
You don't "need" to. It just achieved a culinary effect
54.
▲
by
someguynamedq
29d ago
"ability to play chess" and "ability to beat current best-in-class chess algorithms" are technically not the same thing. The second can be achieved by cheating. The first cannot.
55.
▲
by
someguynamedq
1mo ago
Don't have a competitor for Astra -> we need to slow down
56.
▲
by
someguynamedq
1mo ago
Right and society only works on one thing at a time
57.
▲
by
someguynamedq
1mo ago
Nobody is going to tell you you can't carve your own spoons, smith your own shoes for your horses, and grow your own wheat for your own bread. Just don't blame the people who care more about eating bread than scything wheat.
58.
▲
by
someguynamedq
1mo ago
No, you're just seeing what it looks like when more people are able to make games. It's not the AI that is bad, it's the person who's not putting a lot of work in that's bad. It's just camera phones.
59.
▲
by
someguynamedq
1mo ago
Absolutely not. People just lack imagination in how to use new tools in the pursuit of Eros
60.
▲
by
someguynamedq
1mo ago
This means you don't enjoy making games, you enjoy coding
More ›