solomatov

63 ms·

1. 871.▲
   by solomatov 13y ago

   The usual stackoverflow reaction. They just closed it as a shopping list question.
2. 872.▲
   by solomatov 13y ago

   >Look around you at the Web: all the top sites use JS heavily and without "heroic efforts" compared to Java (dead on the client) or .NET (WPF is dead too). Java isn't used in the browser because of awfully bad user experience, and bad s
3. 873.▲
   by solomatov 13y ago

   >To make such an airy assertion in an under-researched comment makes me suspect that you don't know that much about either PNaCl or "any browser". So why did you make that confident-sounding claim? Unfortunately, I can evaluate technolo
4. 874.▲
   by solomatov 13y ago

   What about PNaCl? What's the reason you don't support it in Mozilla? It's based on open source tools, and can be easily integrated into any browser. P.P.S. IMO, the biggest problem about JavaScript isn't its performance. Performance is ok,
5. 875.▲
   by solomatov 13y ago

   I think this is actually is a very good thing. Before the next big thing can be standardized, it should be created. Google tried to create a next big thing, by moving in several directions, among them are both Dart and PNaCl (which IMO, is
6. 876.▲
   by solomatov 13y ago

   Near native performance is a very good thing especially in the fields such as game development. However, it's a pity that Mozilla doesn't address the main problem with the web platform, the lack of good platform and the set of API, somethin