Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
soloist11
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
31.
▲
by
soloist11
2y ago
One must ask the obvious question: where did the money go?
32.
▲
by
soloist11
2y ago
How does WebSage verify semantic fidelity and avoid hallucinatory confabulations?
33.
▲
The Problem of Sustainable AI
(ojs.weizenbaum-institut.de)
2 points
by
soloist11
2y ago
|
0 comments
34.
▲
by
soloist11
2y ago
All the listed loss functions induce equivalent topologies. Functions which converge in absolute value on a compact space converge also with mean squared error to the same function. The loss function is actually irrelevant and all it does i
35.
▲
by
soloist11
2y ago
The fact is that they do and it doesn't matter how many abstractions we put on top of the underlying physical reality of digital computation, it will always be digital unless someone figures out how to make analog computation as scalab
36.
▲
Ultra-low cost cotton based solar evaporation device for seawater desalination
(sciencedirect.com)
3 points
by
soloist11
2y ago
|
0 comments
37.
▲
by
soloist11
2y ago
It's basic thermodynamics. More energy in the atmospheric system means more violent and extreme weather events. The energy has to go somewhere and it goes into faster winds and bigger storms. In other news: In 2022, U.S. total petroleu
38.
▲
by
soloist11
2y ago
The computer works with binary sequences. LLMs do not change this fact.
39.
▲
by
soloist11
2y ago
This can be said about every AI system/software and not just Figma. First the data is gathered for "self-supervised" training. Then, some product is built on top of it to gather users. Once the users show up their data is in
40.
▲
by
soloist11
2y ago
Folks, there is no formula for detecting anxiety and emotions from pictures alone. Anxiety levels are correlated with nutrition and various biometric markers like cortisol. The AI, no matter how advanced can not detect cortisol levels from
41.
▲
by
soloist11
2y ago
It's again unclear to me what you're arguing about. I have no horses in this race and no problems with either Biden or Trump.
42.
▲
by
soloist11
2y ago
I don't really understand what you're arguing about.
43.
▲
by
soloist11
2y ago
You can use a configuration management tool but you can also just have a bundled archive that is deployed and extracted with SSH. Here's one example: https://community.chef.io/tools/chef-habitat
44.
▲
by
soloist11
2y ago
The standard solution is to use digital keys and signatures. There is no need to reinvent the wheel here, just use the standard cryptographic constructions to verify that the requests are from trusted sources, e.g. https://medium
45.
▲
by
soloist11
2y ago
Now we know that US presidents are above the law. I always assumed that was the case so this is just confirmation for everyone else who had any doubts.
46.
▲
FBI Raid of Oakland Mayor
(latimes.com)
2 points
by
soloist11
2y ago
|
0 comments
47.
▲
by
soloist11
2y ago
Have you guys applied this work internally to optimize Meta's codebase?
48.
▲
Category theory using string diagrams (2014)
(arxiv.org)
79 points
by
soloist11
2y ago
|
23 comments
49.
▲
by
soloist11
2y ago
I see what you're saying so what OpenAI will do next is create an army of GPT critics and then run them all in parallel to take some kind of quorum vote on correctness. I guess it should work in theory if the error rate is small enough
50.
▲
by
soloist11
2y ago
In the critical limit every GPT critic chain is essentially a spellchecker.
51.
▲
by
soloist11
2y ago
Every leap of civilization was built off the back of a disposable workforce. - Niander Wallace
52.
▲
by
soloist11
2y ago
Most of my ideas are not original but where can I learn more about this recursive reward modeling problem?
53.
▲
by
soloist11
2y ago
How do they know it's better? The rate of mistakes is the same for both GPTs so now they have 2 sources of errors. If the error rate was lower for one then they could always apply it and reduce the error rate of the other. They're
54.
▲
by
soloist11
2y ago
Are you sure it's not called recursion?
55.
▲
by
soloist11
2y ago
How do they know the critic did not make a mistake? Do they have a critic for the critic?
56.
▲
by
soloist11
2y ago
How do they verify correctness?
57.
▲
by
soloist11
2y ago
Sci-Hub link: https://sci-hub.se/https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5392...
58.
▲
Irreversibility and Heat Generation in the Computing Process (1961)
(ieeexplore.ieee.org)
4 points
by
soloist11
2y ago
|
2 comments
59.
▲
by
soloist11
2y ago
The problem is the people who are hellbent on mechanizing everything with computers without stopping to think about the ultimate endpoint of their enterprise.
60.
▲
by
soloist11
2y ago
You'll have to discuss these matters with computationalists. I'm not an expert in synthetic biology but from what I've seen their initial stock always consists of existing biological matter and viral recombinators which are o
More ›