Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
socalgal2
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
8 ms
·
61.
▲
by
socalgal2
1mo ago
Obviously, in an emergency, yea, keep them on. That said, > In Dutch culture it is far more common to keep shoes on literally everywhere It is in many cultures, including my own family's, but having gotten used to taking them off fr
62.
▲
by
socalgal2
1mo ago
Let me add further, I think there is value in separating people like Kurzweil (who I think is basically correct) and people like Paul R. Ehrlich who wrote "The Population Bomb" and who's predictions have almost entirely been
63.
▲
by
socalgal2
1mo ago
I agree with you the game is mediorce and feels like a single prompt AI generated game (whether or not it actually is) But, reguarding AI code ... a movie director directs others (actors, camera people, editors, set builders, ...) to make a
64.
▲
by
socalgal2
1mo ago
I look at it like this. I read the book when he made the predictions. Many of them came true. So those predictions were useful to me. It sounds like for you, the fact that they weren't perfect made them worthless and he's someone
65.
▲
by
socalgal2
1mo ago
The code base I work on is > 30 million lines (excluding comments and blank lines) and most (but not all) of the people on the team are finding it pretty effective. That doesn't mean it wouldn't be more effective on a smaller c
66.
▲
by
socalgal2
1mo ago
2 things 1. LLM can fix this in my experience. an LLM, especially the more modern ones, have way more short term memory than most humans (or at least way more than me). They can dig through this kind of code and figure out all the edge case
67.
▲
by
socalgal2
1mo ago
Then what it was chained to is the real issue, not this one. The entire point of having webpages run in their own process is to prevent bugs like this one from doing worse. If you're claiming this bug is the bug that matters, you'
68.
▲
by
socalgal2
1mo ago
Yes, it says right in the CVE > allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code *inside the sandbox*
69.
▲
by
socalgal2
1mo ago
you're taking someone's word it's being exploited. It says right at the top of the report > allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code *inside the sandbox* A bug in V8 leads to code execution in Chrome's web
70.
▲
by
socalgal2
1mo ago
U.S. Trust in Government Depends Upon Party Control https://news.gallup.com/poll/697421/trust-government-depends...
71.
▲
by
socalgal2
1mo ago
Maybe because the people making them are workaholic types who really don't care? I've certainly been in situations where I didn't really care what shows up for a meal. Someone was tasked with getting food and we leave it up t
72.
▲
by
socalgal2
1mo ago
What evidence do you have it’s bad? Most of Europe and Asia requires some form of id
73.
▲
by
socalgal2
1mo ago
I once met a person that claimed they worked on iOS Chrome (the Safari wrap version) and when I asked them why the ad blockers didn't work they claimed they were unaware that the Safari iOS ad blockers didn't work in WebViews. I f
74.
▲
by
socalgal2
1mo ago
...continued from above (part 3)... * Blind people wear special glasses that interpret the real world for them through speech. Sighted people also use these glasses to amplify their own abilities. False * Retinal and neural implants also ex
75.
▲
by
socalgal2
1mo ago
...continued from above (part 2) ... 2019 * The computational capacity of a $4,000 computing device (in 1999 dollars) is approximately equal to the computational capability of the human brain (20 quadrillion calculations per second). False
76.
▲
by
socalgal2
1mo ago
Maybe we have different interpretations of whether or not a prediction is correct or not. If someone predicts in 1999 predicts self driving cars by 2020 and it happens in 2030. That seems different than predicting something we see no indica
77.
▲
by
socalgal2
1mo ago
I'm going to need some evidence that Kurzweil was wrong. AFAICT he was right in 80%+ of his predictions with several more on track.
78.
▲
by
socalgal2
1mo ago
Danluu claims Ray Kurzweil's predictions are wrong. I asked > list 50 predictions by Ray Kurzweil that he made before 2005, the date he made the prediction, and whether to not his prediction was correct. If it was correct, give some
79.
▲
by
socalgal2
1mo ago
I will be happy to come over your place and destroy your stuff by adding my graffiti "art" to it
80.
▲
by
socalgal2
1mo ago
Please tell me where you live. I'd like to come over and ruin your property with graffiti and see how you like it. > defacement of public property Plenty of graffiti is on private property. About $15 billion is spent dealing with pr
81.
▲
by
socalgal2
1mo ago
They didn't measure memory, they measured how busy each processing unit was. It's like going into Activity Monitor, Tops, Task Manager, seeing all CPUs at 100% from your app and thinking "We've reach peak perf by utilizi
82.
▲
by
socalgal2
1mo ago
For me, pulling out a camera I expect to work to take a shot and missing the shot because the thing I was trying to take a photo/video of was over before I could get that camera to work is a the defintion of broken.
83.
▲
by
socalgal2
1mo ago
This entire thing started with Apple in 2019 https://developer.apple.com/documentation/safari-release-not... As for why, because it hasn't affected me all. All the ads are still blocked.
84.
▲
by
socalgal2
1mo ago
I think the price is beyond that though. AFAICT, there's not competitively fast image or video generation on Mac. To buy it will cost me $4000-$12000. So I rent.
85.
▲
by
socalgal2
1mo ago
I guess it depends on what you're trying to do. I've run a few LLMs on my 64gig Mac but anything image or video related is ridiculously slow compared to even old NVidia on my PC.
86.
▲
by
socalgal2
1mo ago
This entire thread is so ridiculous. UBlock Origin Lite still blocks all the ads.
87.
▲
by
socalgal2
1mo ago
You might find this interesting https://www.google.com/search?q=%22%E3%83%9E%E3%83%B3%E7%9B%...
88.
▲
by
socalgal2
1mo ago
Are you conflating what Casey worked on with what RadTools worked on?
89.
▲
by
socalgal2
1mo ago
The goal above was to write fast software. The developers made the mistake of seeing that they had saturated all the cores as "We did a good job of using the entire machine" = "our code is fast". They had a measurement a
90.
▲
by
socalgal2
1mo ago
I don’t think it has anything to do with AI. My thoughts: 1. It’s natural to lose interest in things. I used to be into pop music. Lost interest. I used to game a lot. Lost interest. I used to be into various TV shows, lost interest 2. Not
More ›