snvzz

30 ms·

751.
by snvzz 1y ago
Note that while this was true about software, there is also hardware (FPGA HDL), such as the MacPlus-miSTer core[0]. 0. https://github.com/MiSTer-devel/MacPlus_MiSTer
752.
by snvzz 1y ago
Yeah, it fails the first test. There's no way I'd hand my phone to a stranger.
753.
by snvzz 1y ago
https://archive.is/P5CfR
754.
by snvzz 1y ago
That sounds pretty bad, as it's 4.5 generations (sandy/ivy bridge, haswell+refresh and broadwell). Fortunately, it doesn't matter anymore; Moved that 7900gre to my new machine (Ryzen 9800x3d + 2x 48G DDR5 w/ECC).
755.
by snvzz 1y ago
Great project, but emphasis on Almost[0]. It will not work in the one computer where I need it; On Haswell, 32GB RAM + 16GB BAR is currently not possible[1]. 0. https://github.com/xCuri0/ReBarUEFI/wiki/Common-
756.
by snvzz 1y ago
I am hopeful whatever better compression doesn't end up multiplying memory requirements, or increase burden on cpu, especially on decompression. Now, PNG datatype for AmigaOS will need upgrading.
757.
by snvzz 1y ago
I wonder if I am alone in thinking 5yr is way too short. It should be 10, if not 20 years. This is software, not hardware. It is ridiculous to pretend it is ok for a phone to artificially stop being useful after just 5 years simply because
758.
by snvzz 1y ago
At a glance, it does not seem like they fixed the main issue with what they forked: Not being able to set up arbitrary targets. I run my own instances for a few of the services they redirect to, and need to be able to point to these.
759.
by snvzz 1y ago
>Compared to whom exactly? I live in Japan, where there is a strong cultural emphasis in privacy, which is reflected in law. >Surely you don’t mean... Yeah, I do not.
760.
by snvzz 1y ago
Europe has serious issues with privacy. Very concerning.
761.
by snvzz 1y ago
Why highlight A500's blitter? the original 1985 Amiga 1000 had a near-identical blitter, just different package. The first significant change was the ECS blitter much latter.
762.
by snvzz 1y ago
The 16bit one also looks fun[0] and would run on old PCs the new one does not. Have you considered open sourcing that one? 0. https://krusty.space/projects/rourexos/
763.
by snvzz 1y ago
Last I checked (easily been a decade) it had a major limitation in not supporting Unicode. I wonder if this was ever resolved.
764.
by snvzz 1y ago
An EU DNS resolution server, so that the EU can: - Censor: So they can refuse to solve a name, or solve to whatever address they mandate. - Log: So that you can get criminally prosecuted for having requested resolution of names at any point
765.
by snvzz 1y ago
further update: The license is there now[0]. 0. https://github.com/manaskamal/XenevaOS/blob/master/LICENSE
766.
EmuTOS v1.4 Released(atariscne.org)
2 points by snvzz 1y ago|1 comments
767.
by snvzz 1y ago
Project calls itself Open Source, but I can't seem find the license. Does it have one?
768.
by snvzz 1y ago
>ESP32S3 Unfortunately predates the switch to RISC-V.
769.
by snvzz 1y ago
Hopeful for RISC-V.
770.
by snvzz 1y ago
Let's try and get rid of DST first.
771.
by snvzz 1y ago
>to avoid doing work The problem with "doing work" is that work does take time. Being late means widespread non-standardized, bespoke vendor specific solutions. Exactly the one thing RISC-V International strongly wants to avoid
772.
by snvzz 1y ago
pre-school started at 4 for me (it's 3 these days), and by the end of the first year, every kid could read and write. Some public school systems are better than others. Many countries outright suck.
773.
by snvzz 1y ago
While very convenient to quickly link some ancient draft spec, let's try and stick to the actual ratified specifications[0]. Of course, the rationale is still there in section 2.4 of the current (20250508) ratified version of The RISC-
774.
by snvzz 1y ago
>RISC-V do not define a platform. With a very strictly narrow lens, RISC-V is just the ISA. In reality, a major part of RISC-V International standardization effort goes into non-ISA specs, which include the platform specs, a major focus
775.
by snvzz 1y ago
>You can accomplish the same task in substantially fewer instructions, leading to higher performance for a given level of design effort. The statement is true and favorable to RISC-V, as it is the one with lowest instruction count and co
776.
by snvzz 1y ago
>It is aimed at a completely different market from RISC-V. Not possible. RISC-V is aimed at absolutely everything. Thus leaving no sizable niche exclusive to POWER ISA.
777.
by snvzz 1y ago
The community behind POWER has long been overtaken by RISC-V. This can easily be seen reflected in Debian (largest distribution by package collection), where RISC-V has recently overtaken[0] ppc64 as the third largest ISA in available softw
778.
by snvzz 1y ago
idk about the pain. IMHO it's pure FUD. Generally speaking, it just works. Literal plug and play. And I'm not saying this randomly. I have had my OSSC for years, and I use it with ample variety of hardware, including PC8801, PC980
779.
by snvzz 1y ago
I'd rather the open source hardware OSSC[0] or OSSC Pro[1]. 0. https://videogameperfection.com/products/open-source-scan-co... 1. https://videogameperfection.com/products/ossc-pro/
780.
by snvzz 1y ago
The hurd never moved beyond Mach, a pre-liedtke microkernel. Unless it does, it is unlikely there'll ever be a year of the hurd desktop.

More ›