snsr

75 ms·

271.
by snsr 15y ago
> How do you expect Flickr to differentiate from you and someone else who wants to rip off your content? Any photographer or artist who really doesn't want their images shared should not make them available on the internet. Period. Gi
272.
by snsr 15y ago
While the DOS discussed in that link is quite obviously misguided, counterproductive, juvenile and likely criminal, 'terrorism' seems like a pretty strong word.
273.
by snsr 15y ago
"but to fear that it's suddenly going to shut down a bunch of popular sites overnight and we have to scramble to revert back to an /etc/hosts-over-ftp distribution of addressing is silly" I'm more concerned that unpopular sites will be sh
274.
by snsr 15y ago
GrantS - Trimensional is fantastic; unpredictability is fun and inspiring. Thank you. It's also been my go-to wow demo for the uninitiated.
275.
by snsr 15y ago
I'm sorry, but ..what? While Masnick's critique may not be wholly comprehensive, and is most definitely emotional, I'd argue that in this case some emotion is appropriate. This legislation is indefensible; even in a diluted form it will al
276.
by snsr 15y ago
> I used prostitution as an example, I personally don't see why it should be illegal. However heroin addiction is not the same as corporations and governments lobbying in cahoots. Drugs aren't really viable for an effective lifestyle -
277.
by snsr 15y ago
Handy, especially as I've moved to using touchpads most of the time. Seems like this should be a part of the OS itself. Site design is very clean. Nitpicks: - Web demo slider doesn't work in Safari 5.0.4, neither do any of the toggles, thou
278.
by snsr 15y ago
The interface is an absolute joy to use. I was initialy taken aback by the (large) size of everything, but it makes it surprisingly fun. I love some of the smaller details; the way 'powered-off' Tasks are greyed out for example. Can you sha
279.
by snsr 15y ago
I forward this file to you for review. Please open and view it. -web master I cannot fathom why anyone would open an attachment in an email like this. Someone at EMC has dropped the ball if an email from "web master" doesn't raise every e
280.
by snsr 15y ago
Agreed - pixel/bitmap artist weighs in (not my post): http://mrgan.tumblr.com/post/6840184364/hand-pixelated
281.
by snsr 15y ago
This is a clear-cut case of fair use - it seems Maisel would likely have lost had the case gone to trial (see Blanche vs Koons). To your second point; the original photograph on the Miles Davis cover has absolutely become an iconic piece of
282.
by snsr 15y ago
The examples of work created with the Illustrator-based version here: http://scriptographer.org/gallery/ are hugely inspiring! I wasn't aware that Illustrator can be programmatically expanded in this manner. Looking forward to trying the
283.
by snsr 15y ago
Maybe so. Seems that this is meant to be a work of art rather than a purely technical exercise. Sharing files isn't new - sharing those you've 'deleted' is. From that perspective, it might be cool if it actually used the Trash rather than i
284.
by snsr 15y ago
(This is not my project.) I'd be terrified to use it, but I love this idea. Nonsensical preservation of meatspace thingness. Psuedo-voyeuristic recycling.
285.
DumpsterDrive - Passive Sharing of Deleted Files(dumpsterdrive.com)
1 points by snsr 15y ago|3 comments
286.
by snsr 15y ago
I think efields' criticism centers around the fact that Hype packages the animations in addition to simplifying their creation. I was also a bit surprised initially by the bundling of everything - html, css, js - into a single .js file. Cer
287.
by snsr 15y ago
Signed up. Quick observation; your landing page call to action is below the fold on sub-27" displays.
288.
by snsr 15y ago
I believe Construct was trying to convey a relevant and considerate position; punishing people with prison sentences for playing movies over the internet is unjust. As you are apparently aware, being classified a 'felon' requires that one b
289.
by snsr 15y ago
I think you've hit the nail on the head; my niece and nephews, teenagers and slightly younger, will hang out for hours with multiple video chat windows open.
290.
by snsr 15y ago
It's not immediately apparent to me where my tags will select/filter content from. HN? Twitter? Everywhere?
291.
by snsr 16y ago
Very smooth, interesting use of RTMFP. Couple of thoughts; you might want to consider a conditional note somewhere that Flash is required for those without. Selecting and sending multiple files worked perfectly/instantly on my local network
292.
by snsr 16y ago
Verizon has claimed that their disclosure of customer's private data is protected by the first amendment. http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2007/05/verizon-says... http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=...
293.
by snsr 16y ago
Thanks, my earlier comment reads as being more inflammatory than intended. The very existence of Mrs Espinel's position speaks volumes - http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=9570293...
294.
by snsr 16y ago
The fact that any ip related 'crime' is deemed serious enough to be a felony disgusts me. Espinel is bought and paid for.
295.
by snsr 16y ago
Thanks for posting this. It's concerning that these 'treaties' are being repeatedly floated by the USTR. They're actively circumventing due process and established law. Third party liability for ISPs and other online service providers is p
296.
by snsr 16y ago
Fantastic! Like a contemporary, portable version of jodi.org.
297.
by snsr 16y ago
You reckon correcly; Lion apparently has support for 'HiDPI' mode, which is essentially pixel doubling. http://www.macrumors.com/2011/02/24/mac-os-x-lion-building-i...
298.
by snsr 16y ago
This is clearly an example unreasonable seizure, and it seems the DHS exists solely to perform unreasonable searches. This trend towards outright censorship is a worrying one. While I can't speak to the content of any of the sites in this r
299.
by snsr 16y ago
It's mind boggling that the greatest threat to an individual's freedom in this country is in fact the federal government itself.
300.
by snsr 16y ago
I wholeheartedly disagree; the provisions outlined by the Patriot Act, including these three, do not protect US citizens. They serve only to erode our rights.

More ›