Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
snapplebobapple
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
11 ms
·
91.
▲
by
snapplebobapple
4mo ago
my biggest beef with tmux is the copy/paste is terrible even with the various plugins supposed to fix that (especially the copy).
92.
▲
by
snapplebobapple
4mo ago
Printing is still a disaster on linux, but in linuxs defense, its also a disaster (n windows just a but less of one
93.
▲
by
snapplebobapple
4mo ago
Zero dollars. Because the marginal cost of production is zero and the movie production budget is just a sunk cost. We need to cut copyright terms back to the original term of 14 years and call it a day. Instead of the commons being ceded to
94.
▲
by
snapplebobapple
4mo ago
#metoo
95.
▲
by
snapplebobapple
4mo ago
has anybody figured out how to get this to open a fixed layout? I'm using tmuxp to do this easily with tmux but would switch to this pretty quickly if it was easy to get my layout over. It's really nice. It's like zellij with
96.
▲
by
snapplebobapple
4mo ago
You missed my first point. You get a different outcome because you can hit a different price point securing your outcome and that outcome is still constrained by law. If you make a few hundred billion like Elon did you too can do that. My p
97.
▲
by
snapplebobapple
4mo ago
This doesn't contradict my claim at all. This is and should be a criticism of the system because the system has an ambiguity of outcome built in. If I can hire the same lawyers and skew my outcome to the better for me side then we are
98.
▲
by
snapplebobapple
4mo ago
Why would that be? To me it doesn't seem that interesting vs going to an l4 type kernel that is mathematically verified secure in various operations.
99.
▲
by
snapplebobapple
4mo ago
The original claim is stupid because it is applying a personal moral judgment to a legal system at the individual level, usually for the purposes of justifying theft or other punishments for the person being talked about. it is irrelevant w
100.
▲
by
snapplebobapple
4mo ago
Why do so many people make the same analytical error? It's really simple what is going on: information and power asymmetries are used to accumulate more wealth and therefore power. This happens through a whole bunch of mechanisms usual
101.
▲
by
snapplebobapple
4mo ago
No, my response is protect yourself from the reality of the market via mitigation because you and i cant affect change because the incentive is to get worse for the corporation and minimum efficient scale is too high to have enough competit
102.
▲
by
snapplebobapple
4mo ago
then put something like the OREI 8k HDMI 5 in 1 switch in front. Costs less than 60 dollars, you can control it with whatever universal remote you want or the remote it comes with. If I needed that I would just map it on my flirc skip remot
103.
▲
by
snapplebobapple
4mo ago
No, it's just a bad piece of legislation that follow the pattern the EU almost always follows: Take a good idea, and then figure out the most invasive, costly and imprudent way to implement it, drastically raising everyone's costs
104.
▲
by
snapplebobapple
4mo ago
It was me being obtuse because it made me laugh, lol. I was pretending they misspelled "wanker" as "maker" in the press release because wanker is a british slang term that is much more accurate than maker in this context
105.
▲
by
snapplebobapple
4mo ago
Gdpr is a nice thought that is a practical disaster. The regulatory burden is insane.
106.
▲
by
snapplebobapple
4mo ago
It would be better off as a bunch of sovereign states
107.
▲
by
snapplebobapple
4mo ago
Then you did it wrong. The tv should be turned on and set to display one port, say hdmi1 then never touched again until its time to shut it off. Volume should be handled through hdmi-cec from the tvs perspective it should get an on or off s
108.
▲
by
snapplebobapple
4mo ago
I appreciate that. Noone needs to waste their potty reading time wondering why someone so maliciously and prolifically misspelled "wanker" in multiple different forms throughout a whole article like what happens when you read this
109.
▲
by
snapplebobapple
4mo ago
the only good smart tv is one with no network connection. As long as the manufacturer has any control of the compute on your device they will always be pressured to abuse it to grow revenue. You need to budget 200 to 600 additional dollars
110.
▲
by
snapplebobapple
5mo ago
Elect a carney, get a circus...
111.
▲
by
snapplebobapple
5mo ago
Post secondary should be setup as a loan for the subsidized portion withloan forgiveness prorated over a decade. If you leave the tax net it converts to payments like any other loan. Everywhere should be doing this, its just good policy. Th
112.
▲
by
snapplebobapple
5mo ago
Thats the ubfortunate side effect of cafe standards. They have had to make what people want bigger each year to keep it exempted
113.
▲
by
snapplebobapple
5mo ago
Why do you think any of that is relevant? Of course they will lose. There are enough of them to be a significant minority because of how terrible our federal government is and how big a joke our legal system is. This is entirely about tryin
114.
▲
by
snapplebobapple
5mo ago
Thats the other way to say what i just said. Its not as good a way to say it for this specific issue because it doesn't hilight the differences that matter to this particular discussion
115.
▲
by
snapplebobapple
5mo ago
yah, I was on there in the literal 90's and drifted away in the late 2000's. It's still in my rss reader but I never look at it anymore. Other places have a better smattering of news I care about and I never see tech or other
116.
▲
by
snapplebobapple
5mo ago
Because the only certainty is there is no ideal sort of setup, just a set of probably decent options for the current conditions, which are highly changeable. The only thing that is certain from a benefit maximization perspective is there ar
117.
▲
by
snapplebobapple
5mo ago
So you guys can figure this out but you can't figure out that a wealth tax today is just a destruction of future income tax? You trade the government wasting the money tomorrow for the government wasting the money today and if you thin
118.
▲
by
snapplebobapple
5mo ago
Point of order: that is blatantly untrue. Anti illegal immigrant has everything to do with ensuring the people in the country are known and allowed. It is completely uncoupled from legal immigration. To say an easy solution is increasing le
119.
▲
by
snapplebobapple
5mo ago
man... hacker news is making me sad here. The blatantly obvious stuff that leans left gets upvoted +5 and the blatantly obvious comment made by me directly before this one that leans right is -1. This place used to care more about the corre
120.
▲
by
snapplebobapple
5mo ago
Its probably a situation where you cant choose what you actually want so you choose closest. For me that would be camp 1 but i hate big business because of all the obvious oligopoly market power abuse. Id go back to the 60s antitrust where
More ›