snapcaster

78 ms·

1. 1441.▲
   by snapcaster 5y ago

   Because it was _holy_ water that damaged them because they are demons not aliens in the movie. There is actually no scene in that movie of a spaceship or anything that indicates it's aliens
2. 1442.▲
   by snapcaster 5y ago

   If this is your analysis of the situation you've been greatly misled by fans of certain stocks. I think you should reconsider your mental model of how the financial world works
3. 1443.▲
   by snapcaster 5y ago

   Thanks for this comment
4. 1444.▲
   by snapcaster 5y ago

   This is such an uncharitable interpretation of what he said. Aren't you at least angry that you've been lied to?
5. 1445.▲
   by snapcaster 5y ago

   Gamestop bagholder I presume? How do you detect or prove naked shorting or wash trading?
6. 1446.▲
   by snapcaster 5y ago

   I'm going to guess you don't work as a janitor?
7. 1447.▲
   by snapcaster 5y ago

   Can you explain in clear ways how the person you're telling this to will directly be harmed?
8. 1448.▲
   by snapcaster 5y ago

   Kind of unrelated but if you're interested in African agriculture you should look into Seeing Like a State. The book argues mechanized farms aren't necessarily the highest form of farming for maximum sustainable yield in many plac
9. 1449.▲
   by snapcaster 5y ago

   Can you link some info? Would like to read more about this
10. 1450.▲
    by snapcaster 5y ago

    If you're actually in good faith confused on the downvotes I think it's because people are so sick of hearing and reading people shilling their pet "blockchain for X" company/idea/coin
11. 1451.▲
    by snapcaster 5y ago

    I think both are bad. Have you ever met someone who dislikes the UN but loves the WTO and IMF? I think you're arguing against a strawman with this comment
12. 1452.▲
    by snapcaster 5y ago

    Given that bitcoin has been around for 2008, at what point will you personally concede that it's not likely to happen? Why would it happen now if it didn't in the first 13 years?
13. 1453.▲
    by snapcaster 5y ago

    I don't think it's an extraordinary claim but some evidence would be nice because the comment made me paranoid
14. 1454.▲
    by snapcaster 5y ago

    I don't think this is necessarily true. The headline phrasing and your phrasing both have ability to shift perception. Percentage based phrasing like yours isn't apolitical or free of rhetoric it's just a different framing
15. 1455.▲
    by snapcaster 5y ago

    Is MMO netcode different from regular networking code? I'm not asking rhetorically, i don't really have any experience with either
16. 1456.▲
    by snapcaster 5y ago

    Good question. what would the evidence be? memory errors? i wonder how easy to detect these would be
17. 1457.▲
    by snapcaster 6y ago

    I've always wondered why people take time to comment like this. Do you really think this multi billion dollar corporation is truly "good"? And why do you feel the need to shill for them? They have a PR department that spends
18. 1458.▲
    by snapcaster 6y ago

    Cool to see article by someone I know on here! Really liked this paper, something else I find tricky about them is how hard it often is to accurately measure/report/track progress when writing software. In my experience a lot of t
19. 1459.▲
    by snapcaster 6y ago

    He covers it a bit. Pretty interesting, you know how anime and stuff is all about the "steel folded a billion times" thing? it's because they had to use poor quality iron from sands instead of regular iron ore from rock like