snapcaster

5 ms·

31.
by snapcaster 2mo ago
I already have a rich social life outside the office
32.
by snapcaster 2mo ago
Yes of course
33.
by snapcaster 2mo ago
No it's because we're social animals that are supposed to be around other people. Sick of covid granting so much legitimacy to the antisocial among us. I actually think everyone should be forced to 5 day RTO for their own good
34.
by snapcaster 2mo ago
Their comment was thoughtful and at least added to conversation. Your comment is just "LLMs don't really have neurons" which is obvious to literally every user of this site including the person you're responding to. Much
35.
by snapcaster 2mo ago
Why this gaslighting? obviously the massive companies with vested interest in monetizing your attention and data
36.
by snapcaster 2mo ago
It didn't require saying, and you're also wrong. They don't have physical neurons like a brain but they are made up of abstractions we all agree to call neurons
37.
by snapcaster 3mo ago
okay sure, but also put the fucking graph at the top come on
38.
by snapcaster 3mo ago
Good Editors are Invisible would make more sense. I think this only applies to the class of tools we would call "controllers"
39.
by snapcaster 3mo ago
at no point are you justifying why this would be FUN. it's like you don't even understand what a game is supposed to be
40.
by snapcaster 3mo ago
how would it impact the fun of the game if they weren't?
41.
by snapcaster 3mo ago
Obviously you're right, but none of this stuff matters to the dudes who worship him. As long as he keeps making the people they hate angry they'll support him, even at their own expense
42.
by snapcaster 3mo ago
games are about fun, if something only adds realism for no reason it's not good game design to add it
43.
by snapcaster 3mo ago
you're really reaching for no apparent reason. Just move on from pattern matching machines it's not a good mental model for LLMs
44.
by snapcaster 3mo ago
by "we" you mean an extremely small group of people who read lesswrong. Everyone else was immediately wanting to do it
45.
by snapcaster 3mo ago
I blame black mirror for this attitude. If you're going to speculate on imaginary futures why can't they be positive?
46.
by snapcaster 3mo ago
I hate this crab in a bucket framing. It's so anti-working person. Why isn't it that wages are insanely deflated compared to the US?
47.
by snapcaster 3mo ago
Nobody owes you a scientifically rigorous write up
48.
by snapcaster 3mo ago
So it's a sci-fi short story? what reason would anyone have to believe this stuff?
49.
by snapcaster 3mo ago
I meant this idea that you can quickly iterate on laws. At least in america that's just unrealistic outside of very narrow instances
50.
by snapcaster 3mo ago
what's your point here considering you were wrong? in the last 16 years they've been one of the most profitable companies in the history of the earth
51.
by snapcaster 3mo ago
you're not engaging with all the political and game theory issues that make that difficult to do in practice. Let alone the uncertainty that impacts businesses (even ones that are acting in good faith)
52.
by snapcaster 4mo ago
You're not modeling this adversarially and that's your fundamental error here. If you look at your "knowledge supplier" as an entity actively trying to deceive you and give you an incorrect world model you'll realiz
53.
by snapcaster 4mo ago
You're not modeling this adversarially and that's your fundamental error here. If you look at your "knowledge supplier" as an entity actively trying to deceive you and give you an incorrect world model you'll realiz
54.
by snapcaster 4mo ago
"knowledge is good" is such a naive take. Trivial example: You only have knowledge of crimes committed by immigrants but zero knowledge of crimes committed by citizens. How is that good?
55.
by snapcaster 4mo ago
It's still extremely corrupt, and done to benefit a very small group of people. Dismissing the criticism like this is directly against the rules and spirit of hackernews to assume good faith
56.
by snapcaster 4mo ago
i'm imagining this, and don't see how it has any relation to the discussion
57.
by snapcaster 5mo ago
Bro thinks he's on the team
58.
by snapcaster 5mo ago
I wish people (nerds like us) would use better language. It's not overpriced, because a product is more than a pile of chips and tech specs. Do you realize you're implicitly assuming CPU speed == product quality and how untrue tha
59.
by snapcaster 5mo ago
The span of control for the CEO of my company is more or less 1000 people. His number of direct reports is 5
60.
by snapcaster 5mo ago
superficial maybe, "toxic" is your own personal idealogy

More ›