Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
smsm42
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
21 ms
·
301.
▲
by
smsm42
2y ago
This is good sometimes but also horrible sometimes, because reputation exists for a reason. It's a filter, and if you have terabytes of information around which has mostly garbage quality you need filters if you want to make it useful.
302.
▲
DeepSeek has banned its employees from leaving China
(firstpost.com)
10 points
by
smsm42
2y ago
|
0 comments
303.
▲
by
smsm42
2y ago
Totally agree, just saying if it's already there and you want to read it anyway, there are ways without making an account. Putting it on the blog would be better, ideally.
304.
▲
by
smsm42
2y ago
You can, but it feels like running Doom on a pager - you're probably not getting the best experience and the tool isn't meant for giving you one.
305.
▲
by
smsm42
2y ago
I'm pretty sure if you use thread unroller, it'd still work. Just feed it the url of the first post of the thread and it'll make it readable. It doesn't require any login so it won't be relevant whether you have an
306.
▲
by
smsm42
2y ago
Thousand times yes! I am always completely confused why a smart person that should know better would make a 35-tweet thread instead of just writing a blog post. There are about a hundred advantages for the latter and not a single one for th
307.
▲
by
smsm42
2y ago
Nothing reassures one as much as a goverment enforcement entity essentially saying "we have full legal right to squash you like a bug but for now we won't because we just don't want to. For now".
308.
▲
by
smsm42
2y ago
Well, makes sense - they have budgets freed up now, why not? /s
309.
▲
by
smsm42
2y ago
It's natural for the government to want control. It's literally what it is optimized for - control. More control is always better than less control. More data about subjects always better than less data. What if they do something
310.
▲
by
smsm42
2y ago
He was the President, true, but claiming he was in control of the same FBI which actively tried to pin treason on him is going a bit too far I think...
311.
▲
by
smsm42
2y ago
Yes, it is alarming. May even develop into FBI just forcing private companies to ban speech they don't like! Oh wait tgeycalready did: https://www.newsweek.com/fbi-colluded-twitter-suppress-free-...
312.
▲
by
smsm42
2y ago
It is. The article full of innuendo seemingly linking personnel reductions at FAA with recent catastrophes. While they don't say it explicitly they write it so that the casual reader would conclude those ate related events. They also c
313.
▲
by
smsm42
2y ago
It's not literacy. They don't care. They need control, and if establishing control means increased risks for you, it's not something they see as a negative factor. It's your problem, not theirs.
314.
▲
by
smsm42
2y ago
Sure, there's temptation. Just as goods being laid out on shelves in the store is a big temptation to steal them and not pay. Am I surprised that some people shoplift? No, but that doesn't make their behavior correct or commendabl
315.
▲
by
smsm42
2y ago
Responsible disclosure is not about rewards. And I am not surprised some 16 years old doesn't care. I am more surprised HN ctowd doesn't seem to even mention it. 16 years old can learn, but only if there's a culture to teach
316.
▲
by
smsm42
2y ago
No true Scottsman!
317.
▲
by
smsm42
2y ago
So, responsible disclosure isn't a thing anymore?
318.
▲
by
smsm42
2y ago
Ah that's very easy question. Stocks and bonds have very heavy legal framework you can lean on in many situations. It doesn't mean you can't lose - stock investors lose they money all the time - but at least some scenarios ar
319.
▲
by
smsm42
2y ago
> where there is objectively a lot of suspicious activity, The word "objectively" does a lot of work here, and most of it is unpaid. Every election has irregularities, and every election has the losing side casting suspicions a
320.
▲
by
smsm42
2y ago
Your point is if you're interested in writing code to verify the validity of elections, that is evidence to the suspicion your employer sonehow corrupted the election? That does not sound like a sane line of reasoning.
321.
▲
by
smsm42
2y ago
How it's "resolved"? Just because it happened a while ago (and continued in some different form since then pretty much until now - a lot of "we love DEI" stuff from FAA that I've seen are pretty recent) does no
322.
▲
by
smsm42
2y ago
You seem to pretend to be dense on purpose, so I'll try one last time to explain it to you as simple as possible, in the very slim hope that you have trouble understanding my point and not just trolling. What this legislation was purpo
323.
▲
by
smsm42
2y ago
I'm pretty sure this is not unique to Apple. They likely served the same order to Google, Microsoft, and any other major provider that has any user data. And most of them complied without objection.
324.
▲
by
smsm42
2y ago
> Why do you think those items are labeled? Because labeling cost is close to zero, and cost of drive-by lawsuit is much higher, and the prop 65 is written in a way that practically invites drive-by lawsuits. > But what would you know
325.
▲
by
smsm42
2y ago
You clearly never been in California if you think prop 65 warnings have much to do with drains or safety.
326.
▲
by
smsm42
2y ago
Can you identify all the fire hydrants in a picture?
327.
▲
by
smsm42
2y ago
Who wants to bet this ends up in prop-65-like list of disclaimers about алл тхе automation tools used for every message, which will make the messages bigger but won't make them any less frequent?
328.
▲
by
smsm42
2y ago
Right. Because that's how presidential elections work - the president must do everything personally for the next 4 years and is not allowed to use other people to act on his behalf. That's what Biden did all 4 years for example.
329.
▲
by
smsm42
2y ago
Trump was elected, and he was born in the US, though he does have German ancestry. As an immigrant myself, I personally find it very worrying though that it becomes normal to use foreign descent as a slur in the American political debate. I
330.
▲
by
smsm42
2y ago
All true, but these llm systems aren't random, there's certain intent behind them, they are supposed to do something. So if they do what they are supposed to, then the intent - which is human intent - exists, but it's somethi
More ›