smrtinsert

6 ms·

61.
by smrtinsert 4mo ago
Even at a quick glance this doesn't make any sense. The census is literally how they get the data. Where else would it come from? Drones? Every computer being hacked Michael Bay style?
62.
by smrtinsert 4mo ago
The removal of his name is not performative since we're in the thick of a cult of personality president (at a bare minimum).
63.
by smrtinsert 4mo ago
100% agreed. I saw it somewhere else that the tech industry has burned all the transformative good will it had earned over the years and is now seen as the key villain in joblessness, societal discord and loneliness. What the fuck did happ
64.
by smrtinsert 4mo ago
Which they should. I've been lucky enough to work at places that had great non-technical managers that promoted based on great execution, as well as highly technical managers that also promoted based on great execution. Now I'm a
65.
by smrtinsert 4mo ago
I am definitely for services respecting customer privacy, but I can't help if this is different. I recently saw a thread where a person was bragging that frontier providers were blocking their attempt at what looked like to be social
66.
by smrtinsert 4mo ago
Not nearly enough animated gradient dropshadow. Check out googles AI Mode button and the same loading button status thing while waiting for responses in AI Mode. Please add it so I don't have to prompt for it - I can't tell if I
67.
by smrtinsert 4mo ago
How about product only CTOs who quietly hate engineers because they don't know what they do, and they constantly feel threatened
68.
by smrtinsert 4mo ago
The brutal reality being its probably most capable in that domain. They'll freely admit they're not "the never the smartest guy in the room" and their decision record proves it
69.
by smrtinsert 4mo ago
Little late to the thought leadership circus. What's next, limp LinkedIn posts only her sycophants like?
70.
by smrtinsert 4mo ago
Sorry that's not the use case anymore its about (checks notes) "forward deployed engineers", yep that's it. Go build!
71.
by smrtinsert 4mo ago
This could avoid flagging by Meta explicitly allow bot traffic to do stuff with impunity on its services. Don't tell me an army of people went through and compromised acct by acct.
72.
by smrtinsert 4mo ago
How do business owners hire people from Meta knowing these types of "bugs" get deployed with a shrug? Meta will survive them. Their business might not.
73.
by smrtinsert 4mo ago
"build me a 10 million dollar MRR saas, make no mistakes"
74.
by smrtinsert 4mo ago
A framework releasing an official MCP as well as making AI tooling a key offering is new to me and it immediately strikes me as absolutely necessary.
75.
by smrtinsert 4mo ago
I also had a bad experience, but I'm willing to throw all that out of the window after seeing that it had 128 unified memory on a CUDA enabled device. This is an AI native dream machine from what I can tell. I'm almost obligated
76.
by smrtinsert 4mo ago
There's literally no excuse - I'm still baffled.
77.
by smrtinsert 4mo ago
> Non-techy consumers may never do it They will. As some point in the future, people will want everything, they'll prompt full movies because they're bored and want to watch something.
78.
by smrtinsert 4mo ago
It's stuff like this that honestly makes it very hard for me to take anyone working at Meta seriously. How much communication had to happen to enable this feature? It really casts doubt across the organization at multiple levels, don&
79.
by smrtinsert 4mo ago
How many employees were hatetokenmaxxing I wonder
80.
by smrtinsert 4mo ago
Bitwig and Intellij stand out to me
81.
by smrtinsert 4mo ago
Let's skip to the part where they put the taxpayer on the hook for a bailout as an industry since they integrated everywhere with big promises
82.
by smrtinsert 4mo ago
Why is that tinfoil? That's just good business?
83.
by smrtinsert 5mo ago
what is the value in destroying those relationships? I assume it was acquisition to defend against another company owning a key part of their delivery pipeline, but killing the public product is just bad press.
84.
by smrtinsert 5mo ago
Influencers are getting paid to promote ai for 10s of thousands of USD. This is one the reasons social media has been swamped with it lately.
85.
by smrtinsert 5mo ago
Seems like something that will add to their billable hours
86.
by smrtinsert 5mo ago
From the third party perspective, it feels like gambling to me. I can't imagine being ok with knowing everything keystroke you make is being tracked to train a model, most likely to replace you. I can't imagine ever wanting to w
87.
by smrtinsert 5mo ago
It did this for during one of the recent outrage periods. It was unjarring deps left and right instead of googling for it. What an easy way for me to own the tokenmaxxing leaderboard I remember thinking
88.
by smrtinsert 5mo ago
I'm probably very out of date here, but I thought domains weren't allowed to be purchased programmatically due to misuse, crime, fraud etc. Why is it allowed now just because of agents? This is bonkers to me.
89.
by smrtinsert 5mo ago
Yeah absolutely embarassing take. If I had a nickle for every time someone sent me some AI garbage that was supposedly "thoroughly vetted and cross checked agent output", I'd be at least a thousandaire (gotta keep it real).
90.
by smrtinsert 5mo ago
Can I push to production anytime I want? I can run 10000 agents then no problem. I'll just move fast and break things and I'll get massive cheers because its AI.

More ›