Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
smonff
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
28 ms
·
211.
▲
by
smonff
13y ago
Do you know if something like ReText existe for Android ?
212.
▲
by
smonff
13y ago
Damned ! Here is an information that should be uploaded to Wikipedia.
213.
▲
by
smonff
13y ago
Just ask http://www.builtinperl.com/ for the reasons why. For exemple don't you know that DuckDuckGo is using a lot of Perl ? Another one, that is huge : YouPorn (itself) is using Catalyst. YOU-PORN ! In my opinion, t
214.
▲
Larry Wall has joined Craigslist as Artist in Residence
(blog.craigslist.org)
2 points
by
smonff
13y ago
|
0 comments
215.
▲
by
smonff
13y ago
Encrypt all keywords and store it for later use...
216.
▲
Cpantesters.org is down
(cpantesters.org)
1 points
by
smonff
13y ago
|
0 comments
217.
▲
by
smonff
14y ago
Very far away from Perl Monks.
218.
▲
by
smonff
14y ago
It will not be revolutionary at all for students. You can learn the same at home by coding on Free Softwares, learn everything you need on Stack Exchange and even find a paid job in the end. Don't need to pay an expensive school or going to
219.
▲
by
smonff
14y ago
Speed job thanks
220.
▲
by
smonff
14y ago
Hey. Nobody forces to check-in. We are free to not check-in, not having a Facebook or Google account and all that stuff.
221.
▲
by
smonff
14y ago
Don't support Nexus4 either...
222.
▲
by
smonff
14y ago
If he can't decide, he can still use Perl Catalyst or Mojolicious ! Catalyst guy have a good way to define what's'the difference between RoR and Catalyst: RoR makes easy things simple but complex tasks very hard (when try to run out of the
223.
▲
by
smonff
14y ago
Please check this WikiVS page www.wikivs.com/wiki/Python_vs_Ruby.
224.
▲
by
smonff
14y ago
Don't agree with this anymore. Quoting is wonderful. Free Software is like quotations. You don't need to understand and know everything about a library to use it. You will be better if you do but it's not absolutely necessary. I think we ha
225.
▲
by
smonff
14y ago
I feel it's dirty.
226.
▲
by
smonff
14y ago
Are you Open Source? How can I be sure? However, I'm sure some people are so much busy and worried by their mails that your tool will be helpful.
227.
▲
by
smonff
14y ago
I like the idea. I like the features. It looks nice. But I won't give you my Gmail credentials.
228.
▲
by
smonff
14y ago
And check out how CPAN is an active modules repository :D http://stats.cpantesters.org/statscpan.html
229.
▲
by
smonff
14y ago
Also check out the excellent 2012 Ovid's Beginning (modern ) Perl - http://ofps.oreilly.com/titles/9781118013847/
230.
▲
by
smonff
14y ago
Hope they could create a kind of huge centralized 'CJSAN' repository as CPAN [1] is. I've checked some existing projets [2] but it can hardly list some hundred modules. NPM [3] is great, but it should himself be integrated into a larger JS
231.
▲
by
smonff
14y ago
Absolutely, it is when following readability guidelines and write documentation. Using obfuscation style is a mess and will never help anybody but the developer ego who believes he is smarter than everybody. But that's a pitty to act like t
232.
▲
by
smonff
14y ago
Agree with the opinion that modern Perl5 is much more simplier to read than JS. Especially with stuff like jQuery.
233.
▲
by
smonff
14y ago
There's another obvious way to write good Perl thanks to the CPAN: don't write it because others already made the work better than you. @mutation: i agree with doc quality.
234.
▲
by
smonff
14y ago
France too. But it doesn't seem to be down everywhere ( http://www.downforeveryoneorjustme.com/www.facebook.com )
235.
▲
by
smonff
14y ago
It's cool, but it's a pity that this thing is on Google Groups.
236.
▲
by
smonff
14y ago
Wikipedia don't need to be cool. It just need to be simple and clear. It don't need a better logo or anything. Wikipedia is content and people who are building it. You design is ok for a design brand or a contemporary art stuff but not for