smarx007

18 ms·

211.
by smarx007 3y ago
Thank you, I stand corrected, 800M+ WordPress installations.
212.
by smarx007 3y ago
Does your blog support comments? Also, for a company blog, an SSG likely means a requirement to know Git, which could be inconvenient.
213.
by smarx007 3y ago
I think 800+ million Wordpress blogs are not planning to shut down in 2023 after reading GP's comment.
214.
by smarx007 3y ago
There are already standards like XML and RDF Turtle that allow you to clearly communicate vocabulary, such that a property 'iso3779:vin' (shorthand for a made-up URI ' https://ns.iso.org/standard/52200#vin
215.
by smarx007 3y ago
This seems to be due to [1], so the project is hardly demoable now. [1]: https://codeberg.org/gothub/gothub/issues/124
216.
by smarx007 3y ago
I fail to see how risk #6 was rated "very likely" given that neither #4 nor #5 scored "very likely".
217.
by smarx007 3y ago
When I was using Bugzilla, I was always unhappy with its "clunkiness". However, since I was forced to migrate to Github and Gitlab, I sorely miss proper sorting on multiple columns and the ability to select the necessary columns f
218.
by smarx007 3y ago
In process of migrating to a self Gitlab by 2024-2026 [1]. [1]: https://www.eclipse.org/lists/eclipse.org-committers/msg0135...
219.
by smarx007 3y ago
This is how it should be done: https://computersweden.idg.se/2.2683/1.779824/danska-molnfor... The CEO of CloudNordic confirmed the attack took place and that backups were lost in an interview to Radio4.Dk, as rep
220.
by smarx007 3y ago
It’s not a bad starting logic. However, there is a thing called “defacing”. In the process, the attackers share false information implying that more damage was done than in reality. My general rule is to stop trusting a compromised digital
221.
by smarx007 3y ago
How can you trust the webpage of a system that was recently attacked?
222.
by smarx007 3y ago
Shoddy journalism strikes again. How do we know that all data was lost and the notice on the homepage was not uploaded by hackers? "CloudNordic could not be reached for comment." It's a journalist's job to reach either t
223.
by smarx007 3y ago
While on the topic, I think EUPL should become the default license for open-source projects in the business context. It's a weak copyleft license (OSI and FSF approved), so it does not strike mortal fear of "viral" license sp
224.
by smarx007 3y ago
What kind of journalism is this? First, The Guardian uses statements from a no-name group "US Right-To-Know" instead of doing fact-finding themselves. Fact-finding is what good journalism is all about. Second, it is quite bold to
225.
by smarx007 3y ago
In my opinion, it's a perfect replacement for LGPL, EPL, and MPL to ensure SaaS users are covered by the terms of the license.
226.
EUPL, a weak copyleft license that closes the SaaS loophole, OSI+FSF approved(joinup.ec.europa.eu)
2 points by smarx007 3y ago|2 comments
227.
by smarx007 3y ago
True, sending back to upstream is not required by the license. But even AGPL does not require this. Rolling up a tar of your source tree, however, will be required if you get a request from one of your customers by email. The difference fro
228.
by smarx007 3y ago
> As far as I read the MPL, the contribution back part is not mandatory That's not how I read it. > the contribution back part is not mandatory In that case weak copyleft would not be any different from MIT/BSD. First, assum
229.
by smarx007 3y ago
I think that once you have more than X customers, you don't really need OSS testers and bug-reporters that much – your customers will be the first ones to file a ticket if anything is wrong. And as we saw with CentOS Stream, OSS users
230.
by smarx007 3y ago
MPL is a copyleft license, actually, just like EPL and EUPL. What it is not is a viral copyleft license. Anyone making changes to TF code and productionizing it is expected to contribute back but only the direct changes to TF itself, not
231.
by smarx007 3y ago
I think the Lockdown Mode will disable 2G only starting with iOS 17. The press release [1] doesn't mention 2G directly but only "safer wireless connectivity defaults" but FastCo [2] is more direct "with iOS 17, Apple is
232.
by smarx007 3y ago
How? iOS 17 is not released yet.
233.
by smarx007 3y ago
Won't help. I've had multiple callers encounter trouble with what I guess WebRTC traffic due to browser extensions, "anti" virus software, VPN policies etc. Zoom etc. works fine. They usually fixed it by switching to a p
234.
by smarx007 3y ago
> If you own an Apple Silicon powered MacBook the relative builds are refered to as aarch64, they are cross-compiled and we did not test them before release. > It is possible that Apple Silicon users see their recently downloaded Libr
235.
by smarx007 3y ago
Same thought – I was surprised to see no mention of Matrix or XMPP.
236.
by smarx007 3y ago
I would be interested in the differences between BlazingMQ, AMQP, and MQTT protocols and the invariants afforded to the clients, not the implementations per se.
237.
by smarx007 3y ago
A bit off-topic, but would be good to read what TigerBeetle folks think of the tech behind the recently released FedNow.
238.
by smarx007 3y ago
I think the right avenue is to complain to W3C instead. Especially in the light of https://www.w3.org/TR/2023/DNOTE-w3c-vision-20230725/#princi... and violation of CoC https://www.w3.org/Conso
239.
by smarx007 3y ago
Have you seen bank "login redirects" when the system redirects you for ca. 5-10 times before actually letting you in? This proposal could be defeated in the same way: after successful authn, the user is redirected to the page &#x2
240.
by smarx007 3y ago
He did contact HN, a premier provider of support. /s

More ›