slowernet

9 ms·

1. 61.▲
   by slowernet 16y ago

   You answered a question with a question, possibly a wise question, but nevertheless an obtuse reaction to the questioner's want of tactical knowledge. You were downvoted once and decided that one person's lack of appreciation of nuance mean
2. 62.▲
   by slowernet 16y ago

   False dichotomy. They're both aggregators per se, but one top-down curates breaking news (and reactions to it, which is why a story may take up so much space), the other uses voting to optimize news of any age to the interest level of a com
3. 63.▲
   by slowernet 16y ago

   My company sends nearly 3MM messages a month through SG. We're largely happy, but I concur on each one of these pain points.
4. 64.▲
   by slowernet 16y ago

   Try reading it as opinionated writing, rather than a mathematical proof of something that is offensive to you personally. IMHO one should be able write without the pretense of neutrality and be judged holistically rather than dismissed out