Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
slg
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
34 ms
·
751.
▲
by
slg
2y ago
>I would think that harm being rendered against the now dead is still harm that occurred against a person who was living at the time?? Dead people generally lose most protections from stuff like invasions of privacy and defamation (obvio
752.
▲
by
slg
2y ago
>In the sense that no real subject is being harmed, this makes sense. I don't like this logic for the legality of AI images because we wouldn't allow it with non-AI images. For example, should CSAM be legal if the person in th
753.
▲
by
slg
2y ago
>Still more accurate most of the time than a lot of historical video games at least. This game is much closer to Trivial Pursuit than it is Assassin's Creed. The importance of accuracy depends on the type of game and when the point
754.
▲
by
slg
2y ago
> in normal weather, normal driving conditions without the AC/heater on, on a straight road with no elevation gain. Another aspect of this debate from my own experience, Tesla's range estimates from the navigation system are mu
755.
▲
by
slg
2y ago
They asked a question specifically about the feelings of a "heterosexual man". Why include the sexuality of that hypothetical person in the question if their sexual preferences were not intended to be part of the answer? I don&#x
756.
▲
by
slg
2y ago
>That doesnt make him prejudiced It is literally the dictionary definition of prejudice. From Merriam-Webster[1]: >1. b (1) - an adverse opinion or leaning formed without just grounds or before sufficient knowledge They directly said
757.
▲
by
slg
2y ago
It is funny that I ended my last comment with the following: "It is pointless to debate whether definitions are or are not important when the actual issue being debated here is whether Tesla is good or bad." and you're seemin
758.
▲
by
slg
2y ago
Yes, this is a perfect example of what I'm talking about. A Tesla fan could also give you an equally logical explanation about how the "regulatory definition" of "recall" is outdated because it is from an era in whi
759.
▲
by
slg
2y ago
Maybe not recalls specifically, but the continued improvement of Tesla's software even after purchase is absolutely a selling point of their cars, especially in the era before widespread Android Auto and CarPlay when the software in ca
760.
▲
by
slg
2y ago
The specific example that other user gave clearly did not have OTA updates. But like EVs in general, the industry wide move to more OTA updates was in large part due to the competition that Tesla presented forcing the rest of the industry t
761.
▲
by
slg
2y ago
You're ignoring the difference in the Tesla update being pushed out to cars immediately, while the other manufacturer's update waited until you happened to bring your car in for servicing. How many miles did you continue to drive
762.
▲
by
slg
2y ago
It is funny how Tesla fans' and critics' philosophy on which definitions to use depends entirely on the topic being discussed. For the Tesla fan, the colloquial definition of "recall" is what we should go by because the
763.
▲
by
slg
2y ago
>Do you see how you're not actually getting any information from that? I don't know what to tell you. There is information in these articles and you don't even need to trust the journalists who are reporting them. All th
764.
▲
by
slg
2y ago
Your wife seems to be confused and is probably lumping together the previous round of voluntary deferred resignations with the more recent round of firings and layoffs. The exact word used by both the USDA spokesperson and NNSA email was &q
765.
▲
by
slg
2y ago
The example I gave was people being fired and immediately rehired[1][2] and you're blaming that on the fake news not understanding Trump's "trolling"? That is your defense that this is all "part of a well construct
766.
▲
by
slg
2y ago
>It’s the same with firing people and hiring them back. Performance metrics are unreliable, but firing and then hiring back who you miss isn’t. It shows you who is really critical. I might believe this if there was actually any time betw
767.
▲
by
slg
2y ago
>Not unless someone is suicidal There are plenty of examples of rulers suddenly becoming suicidal once the walls start closing in on them.
768.
▲
by
slg
2y ago
>The best interview process I've ever been a part of involved pair programming with the person for a couple hours... You never failed to know within a few minutes whether the person could do the job There is something funny about t
769.
▲
by
slg
2y ago
Care to provide examples?
770.
▲
by
slg
2y ago
I'm not talking about this philosophically so you can call it whatever you want sentience, consciousness, self-determination, or anything else. From a purely practical perspective, either the AI is giving itself its instructions or ta
771.
▲
by
slg
2y ago
> Evil human masters might impose a dystopia Why are you assuming this is the worst case scenario? I thought human intentions didn’t translate directly to the AI’s goals? Why can’t a human destroy the world with non-sentient AI?
772.
▲
by
slg
2y ago
You are choosing to pick a nit with my phrasing instead of understanding the underlying point. The "intentions of their human masters" is a higher level concern than an AI potentially misinterpreting those intentions.
773.
▲
by
slg
2y ago
I agree, but that is removing the nuance that in this specific case Y is a prerequisite of X so focusing solely on X is a mistake. And for sake of clarity: X = sentient AI can do something dangerous Y = humans can use non-sentient AI to do
774.
▲
by
slg
2y ago
I think that is missing the point. The AI's goals are what are determined by its human masters. Those human masters can already have nefarious and selfish goals that don't align with "human values". We don't need
775.
▲
by
slg
2y ago
It is probably telling that multiple people here think that the only relevant framing of "impressive" is as an investment. And that is only made stranger by the fact that Tesla has been objectively a hugely successful investment
776.
▲
by
slg
2y ago
>EVs were already a common sight in France way before Tesla. I can't say I'm an expert on French automotive sales. It is possible they have always had a small market for EVs going back years, but there clearly was an inflectio
777.
▲
by
slg
2y ago
That July 2017 article you linked cites Volvo committing to switch their fleet to all electrics and hybrids. If you click on that hyperlink you will find this paragraph: >Of Elon Musk’s Tesla, whose ‘mass market’ Model 3 is expected to
778.
▲
by
slg
2y ago
You seem to want to argue against a point I'm not making, so this is me ducking out of our conversation.
779.
▲
by
slg
2y ago
>Were any of the existing car manufacturers ever threatened by Tesla Yes, that is why almost all of them started heavily investing in EVs after Tesla proved they were a viable product. You seem to believe that "disruption" can
780.
▲
by
slg
2y ago
Genuinely can't tell if you are trying to be sarcastic with the first sentence, but I'll just point out that Tesla can both have accomplished a lot as a company, been a net benefit for humanity, be wildly overvalued as a company,
More ›