slenk

33 ms·

361.
by slenk 5y ago
I think the lobbies are too strong and washington is too greedy for anything to happen
362.
by slenk 6y ago
But that's a different protocol than the signal protocol. And Signal encrypts your SMS at rest should you choose to use their app to do so.
363.
by slenk 6y ago
Unless you are fully in the Apple ecosystem already, it's not very welcoming. Price being one thing but with how Apple recently demonstrated they can just take away all your movies with no recourse, I will pass
364.
by slenk 6y ago
Yea but Moxie is trying to make money out of said dogshit software with his crypto editions
365.
by slenk 6y ago
I guess it was Romanovsky who said it: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nfs/YH+zwQgBBGUJdiVK@unreal/ Wait so do you disagree with ZDnet too?
366.
by slenk 6y ago
I have such a horror story of Amazon losing a Snowball that had to only travel 17 miles. Would not recommend.
367.
by slenk 6y ago
Ah, missed that post.
368.
by slenk 6y ago
Is there a reason to post this? I don't see any updates and the Snowmobile has existed for a few years now.
369.
by slenk 6y ago
I never use MongoDB but I did not know that. That's pretty lame.
370.
by slenk 6y ago
So is Greg K-H a liar when he said some were accepted into stable?
371.
by slenk 6y ago
I honestly do not know
372.
by slenk 6y ago
I will second DBeaver. It can connect to anything and has made massive improvements since I started using it years ago
373.
by slenk 6y ago
Yeah...yeah. I will say - reserved instance pricing is great on AWS if you know you will be there for a while.
374.
by slenk 6y ago
I feel you on Cloudformation :S I haven't used Kubernetes on either platform - so there may be more to that. One thing I really dislike about GCP is how expensive it is for personal or hobby use. I burned through $300 for a simple vm o
375.
by slenk 6y ago
From my side - I have never seen an easy Google Cloud deploy but have no problems working with AWS.
376.
by slenk 6y ago
Except Greg K-H disagrees with the students, stating it did make it to stable. I trust Greg over the students.
377.
by slenk 6y ago
Is it? Linux underpins many medical devices - it too could lead to life and death consequences
378.
by slenk 6y ago
Expelling the students seem overkill - they have advisors that should be fired for allowing it to happen
379.
by slenk 6y ago
I would hope most here are above spamming hatemail to things they aren't involved with...
380.
by slenk 6y ago
I don't think any legal actions need to be taken. UMN can longer participate. Tough shit.
381.
by slenk 6y ago
No, it's not. It's banning anyone who hides behind their UMN email address. Because its been proving now the UMN.edu commits have bad actors.
382.
by slenk 6y ago
Ok...then is everybody who graduated from MIT radioactive, even if they graduated 50 years ago, since Epstein has been involved? Your logic doesn't make ANY sense.
383.
by slenk 6y ago
I know this is old, but got a link? That LMKL thread is long
384.
by slenk 6y ago
Is it in good faith when they were already told explicitly to not continue? That's the point where it becomes intentionally malicious IMO
385.
by slenk 6y ago
A flamewar detector is absurd and illogical?
386.
by slenk 6y ago
Does it matter? They intentionally used their position as a university to push patches with malicious intent through.
387.
by slenk 6y ago
It also says if this is a false positive to let the "experimental semi-automated" bot know...
388.
by slenk 6y ago
Not if your intention is to cause harm....
389.
by slenk 6y ago
It does seem like ultimately they played themselves by getting permanently banned from participating.
390.
by slenk 6y ago
1 in 30 is very odd. Rate limit? Make sure you have reverse lookup for IPv4 and 6?

More ›