sleepycal

9 ms·

1. 31.▲
   by sleepycal 12y ago

   Thank you for the detailed feedback and links, much appreciated. Your comments regarding performance are absolutely correct and I'll update the article to reflect this. LX branded zones, and indeed Solaris in general, is something I ha
2. 32.▲
   by sleepycal 12y ago

   Thanks for your honesty, I'm drafting a follow up article which explains the pros/cons of each alternative that I've reviewed so far (packer.io, heroku and ec2). However people have been posting some interesting alternatives
3. 33.▲
   by sleepycal 12y ago

   An excellent question, and I'm drafting a follow-up article which answers this, due to be published in the next month or so.
4. 34.▲
   by sleepycal 12y ago

   Good points. I failed to mention marketplace AMIs which, despite my disliking of AWS, is an equivalent ecosystem for sharing images.
5. 35.▲
   by sleepycal 12y ago

   Thank you for your honesty, you are right to point this out and I'll be editing accordingly (see above comment)
6. 36.▲
   by sleepycal 12y ago

   Thanks for the reply, it actually made me smile. Typically my articles are a representation of the emotions that the subject makes me feel, in this case 6 months of rage inducing frustration. I do try and balance out my criticisms with posi
7. 37.▲
   by sleepycal 12y ago

   Thanks for the feedback, I'll check out kubernetes. Although I agree that containerisation is having an impact in terms of encouraging immutable infrastructure, I would argue that this is easily achieved using virtualisation. Other peo
8. 38.▲
   by sleepycal 12y ago

   Thanks for the feedback, someone else made a similar comment on Reddit, and it's a fair point. (paste from reddit) I agree that the Docker ecosystem makes getting started easier, and my argument of uselessness is focused on the long te
9. 39.▲
   by sleepycal 12y ago

   Thanks for the feedback and alternatives, I hadn't seen Spoon or LXD yet so I'll check those out. Namespaces are sometimes supported directly by the application itself, for example uWSGI, and anything lacking native support you ca
10. 40.▲
    by sleepycal 12y ago

    Feedback and constructive criticism welcome
11. 41.▲
    Let's review Docker(iops.io)

    187 points by sleepycal 12y ago|100 comments
12. 42.▲
    by sleepycal 12y ago

    Do it. Lets throw in a <marquee/> too.. I'll even "git filter-branch" your commit afterwards. No one will ever know. :D
13. 43.▲
    by sleepycal 12y ago

    I want to shake your hand and buy you a drink. Long live FC.
14. 44.▲
    by sleepycal 12y ago

    http://d.pr/f/pJqJ
15. 45.▲
    by sleepycal 12y ago

    You sir, are a gentleman and a scholar. Good reading!
16. 46.▲
    by sleepycal 12y ago

    Strongly agree. But I'll lose my commit privileges if I remove it... worth it? Maybe :P
17. 47.▲
    by sleepycal 12y ago

    1000000% agree, I don't know why that's the "in thing" at the moment
18. 48.▲
    by sleepycal 12y ago

    r.e. outage - Sorry about the blip, auto scaling was a bit slow to respond, tweaked and should be fine now :)
19. 49.▲
    by sleepycal 12y ago

    Sorry yeah my bad, was in the middle of re-writing git history when this got pushed, took a few minutes to revert :) No security problems on frontend, in fact it was the parser protections which kicked in, preventing <?php from parsing e