skydhash

13 ms·

271.
by skydhash 3mo ago
> The recent changes sound like the banning process has been expanded to cover a lot of new things that it didn't before This is the actual part of the TOS Please be aware that this list is neither exhaustive nor complete (illus
272.
by skydhash 3mo ago
It's moslty due to how the protocol works. Sending and Receiving are asynchronous and may or may not follow the same path. When sending the other side is the server, when receiving, you are the one. The protocol also has the concept of
273.
by skydhash 3mo ago
It does exists for any bank. Where I'm at, the assurance is given by the national bank, not the individual banks. Anything else is just probability and marketing. In Codeberg case, what I would be looking at is the actual banning proce
274.
by skydhash 3mo ago
> That's just vibes. They are not. You can probably draft some query to get candidates based on those criteria. And so very quickly. > Quotas are automated, evicting projects is highly manual. The human world is very chaotic. Aut
275.
by skydhash 3mo ago
I like math. I’ve done engineering in college which included a fair share of it and pursue it for fun. Programming is also not math for me. It’s formal notation where you’re manipulating things encoded as numbers. Just like music sheets are
276.
by skydhash 3mo ago
> It is an unenforceable rule Are you sure? It's pretty easy to find telltale signs of LLM usage, like the CLAUDE.md file, the '.cursor' directory, the 'vim'-sized codebase done in a week.
277.
by skydhash 3mo ago
May not be applicable to most, but this can be solved by multiple devices. I have three laptops (my work mbp, my personal mba and my daily driver which runs OpenBSD) and two mini computers (one is a server for file and misc. stuff and the o
278.
by skydhash 3mo ago
> I derive zero enjoyment from Kubernetes configs, or Terraform, or fucking around with log settings, or screwing around with all the knobs for Kafka. That stuff is agonizing. The click for me was thinking in terms of outcomes and system
279.
by skydhash 3mo ago
> Many influential F/OSS projects started with a small number of users (and contributors), and will continue to do so for the foreseeable future. They also start very small in terms of resources consumption.
280.
by skydhash 3mo ago
Human written is not a proxy of good code. But human written and published on a hosting platform (with the additional artifacts like docs, build system, tests) are generally good. While LLM may generate all of these, but they are slop.
281.
by skydhash 3mo ago
I’d say all of them. Most people use computers as tools or as entertainment platforms. While a bug may not be life threatening in most cases, it is annoying and stress generating.
282.
by skydhash 3mo ago
Maybe he is a freelancer or a business owner and not an employee. If you’re one of the former, there’s often little separation between work and personal. I only truly enforce separation when I’m an employee, with different devices for each
283.
by skydhash 3mo ago
I would pay for tooling, but most of them is now pure grift. Even Jetbrains has gone the anticonsumer route with their focus on AI (plugins enabled by default).
284.
by skydhash 3mo ago
Git is also a tool, but cloning a repo does not means I created the software.
285.
by skydhash 3mo ago
Because code and data as well as the von Neumann architecture are derived things, not fundamental stuff. The Turing Machine and Lambda Calculus are pure invention thats are logically sound. Almost everything else is downstream of that. By t
286.
by skydhash 3mo ago
You only need a monitor to capture the audio output and use that as the input in the recorder software. Pipewire and macOS have a whole graph as their sound system where you can connect node (input, outputs, dsp) however you want. Don’t kno
287.
by skydhash 3mo ago
At the base of it, the TM is an abstraction built with sets and relations. Just like most computers are merely signals flowing around a circuit that get generated from other physical phenomena and will be transformed to other physical pheno
288.
by skydhash 3mo ago
> I think where people get worked up about this, is that it's not easy to tell what understanding other folks are taking away from their AI usage. Alongside understanding, you also loose taste and perception. You can still say wheth
289.
by skydhash 3mo ago
Sounds very much like agency over the process versus agency over the outcome. Some are ok with deciding if and when the process should be started and whether the outcome is good and bad. But often they lack the judgment to truly decide what
290.
by skydhash 3mo ago
State transition in the turing machine are not modifiable, but one of the core advantages of the TM is that it's powerful enough to emulate state transition. So you can model the states of the new machine as data, add the transition me
291.
by skydhash 3mo ago
“code is data and data is code” is a fact of computing. What LISP does is to make it an official feature of the language and provide nice abstraction for it. A lot of languages want you to use some cumbersome reflection library, a dangerous
292.
by skydhash 3mo ago
I spent my whole childhood without computers and a good chunk of my teenage years without stable internet connection. Now, I have both, but due to the state of the internet, I'm returning to my old routine: A load of books to learn fro
293.
by skydhash 3mo ago
> Some folks don't care much at all about how things work, just that they can shove a thing out the door and get paid with minimal effort. Sometimes their boss is completely in agreement The issue is not the quality per se (I can wr
294.
by skydhash 3mo ago
> Whenever the subject of AI comes up in connection to programming it feels like the conversation always misses the human element. When you look at this only in terms of human behavior I am not seeing anything new with AI You’re not wron
295.
by skydhash 3mo ago
Let’s say you were trying to say “I like bread” in French (which is “j’aime le pain”) but what come out is “j’aime le vin” (I like wine). It is the wrong statement, but it will produce an effect as the other party may bring you wine (which
296.
by skydhash 3mo ago
> Now it's at the level of a competent junior, who can almost do the whole task from start to finish but needs a little supervision. Define tasks! The most important aspects is that they’ve always been good at applying patterns, but
297.
by skydhash 3mo ago
The cost of prototyping has always been very low. I can quickly sketch a UX flow using balsamiq. Or copy-paste paste code from docs and examples to show a rough working model with. If you can extract the essence of the problem you can quick
298.
by skydhash 3mo ago
They are. But engineering is about minimizing costs in solving a problem while ensuring requirements are met. Not worrying about costs is not engineering. It's either a research project (where you want to know if something is possible)
299.
by skydhash 3mo ago
> Stakeholders will only give you requirements after they see the prototype. That’s very much incorrect and sounds like someone who love building more than communicating. Even without a prototype, users and other consumers will be able t
300.
by skydhash 3mo ago
Determinism isn’t important, but there are usually threshold of acceptable performance in all off those cases. Machine Learning was all about improving accuracy even when you know that there’s probably an error somewhere. But the current LL

More ›