Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
skrebbel
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
17 ms
·
391.
▲
by
skrebbel
11mo ago
Omg I’m totally starstruck now! Purely out of curiosity, was that all a volunteer open source effort or was the entire DJGPP group acting as a consulting organization?
392.
▲
by
skrebbel
11mo ago
Random drive-by nitpick: > From the beginning of the development, id had requested from djgpp engineers that their DPMI client would be able to run on djgpp's DPMI server but also Windows 95 DPMI server. I'm pretty sure that
393.
▲
by
skrebbel
11mo ago
yep
394.
▲
by
skrebbel
11mo ago
About the ordered keys, most good languages have an ordered map type, either by accident or by design. Those few languages that don’t would need a list of key-value pairs. Given that this is for config, the performance cost of linear-scanni
395.
▲
by
skrebbel
11mo ago
A good configuration syntax isn’t supposed to be exciting.
396.
▲
by
skrebbel
11mo ago
I don't like this article all that much but I do like the MAML format the author wrote this to promote. It seems like it’s everything that’s good about JSON, plus everything fixed for human writing, and nothing more . Hats off, wish m
397.
▲
by
skrebbel
11mo ago
wow
398.
▲
by
skrebbel
11mo ago
I don’t understand what you mean with “Dialog”. This is a language right? And not a UI?
399.
▲
by
skrebbel
11mo ago
_.any doesn’t seem to exist. Some and every are also in JS (with the same names even!). keyBy is just Array.map -> Object.fromEntries
400.
▲
by
skrebbel
11mo ago
Why does it make you angry when people make things? Making things is good! You should try it!
401.
▲
by
skrebbel
11mo ago
I think the real answer is "because LaTeX does it that way and everybody inventing their own fancy math syntax used a lot of LaTeX".
402.
▲
by
skrebbel
11mo ago
Nice! I was confused about your "Why AsciiMath" section, which doesn't say anything about AsciiMath. It's also unclear to me what the difference is between Mathup and AsciiMath - you write that Mathup is inspired by it b
403.
▲
by
skrebbel
11mo ago
How does this work? Why would people let randos use their home internet connections? I googled it but the companies selling these services are not exactly forthcoming on how they obtained their "millions of residential IP addresses&quo
404.
▲
by
skrebbel
1y ago
You can, but now you have to be honest about why.
405.
▲
by
skrebbel
1y ago
What a weird site. Am i getting it right that this "Deckard" was the code name for the Frame, it's out now, but the makers of the site went through all that trouble make a dotcom and a pedantic design but can't be bother
406.
▲
by
skrebbel
1y ago
FYI ChatGPT has a “custom instructions” setting in the personalization setting where you can ask it to lay off the idiotic insincere flattery. I recently added this: > Do not compliment me for asking a smart or insightful question. Dire
407.
▲
by
skrebbel
1y ago
And? How does that give the ffmpeg authors a power over Amazon? (Hint: it doesn’t and the guy we’re discussing is spewing nonsense for maximum retweets)
408.
▲
by
skrebbel
1y ago
How could ffmpeg maintainers kill three major AWS product lines with an email?
409.
▲
by
skrebbel
1y ago
You’re right but you’re responding to a troll.
410.
▲
by
skrebbel
1y ago
It’s a joke
411.
▲
by
skrebbel
1y ago
Maybe they had a local llm write it but the memory bandwidth was too low for a decent answer.
412.
▲
by
skrebbel
1y ago
Cool! If I may ask, what made you settle on the double dash to disambiguate content from tags? Like is it some sort of nod to SGML from way back when? It seems like an odd choice to me at first glance, but I bet it was thought about long an
413.
▲
by
skrebbel
1y ago
I love everything about this site. The design, the vibe, the rhetoric.. It’s a work of art!
414.
▲
by
skrebbel
1y ago
Wow so weird! Is this like some weird roundabout indiehacker marketing trick?
415.
▲
by
skrebbel
1y ago
> which is par for Rubyists Pro-tip: re-read your comment before you submit and take out the bits that make you sound like an asshole.
416.
▲
by
skrebbel
1y ago
Enum.map(&String.to_integer/1) vs .map(&:to_i) To me the latter is no less clear so yeah, substantially more. For context I write Elixir once a week and Ruby once a decade. In particular in this case elixir’s (and erlang’s) ari
417.
▲
by
skrebbel
1y ago
I dunno, to me that seems like all YAML's mistakes all over again. I quite like the conciseness, and significant whitespace seems like a good match here, but the double hyphen thing really seems odd to me. And the syntax is so hard to
418.
▲
by
skrebbel
1y ago
I never thought I’d live to see the day a link to Action got posted on HN but alas, it has arrived! Show those Dollar General losers across the pond how it’s really done
419.
▲
by
skrebbel
1y ago
Obfuscates how?
420.
▲
by
skrebbel
1y ago
> why do you prefer parenthesis-less function calls? I don’t feel strongly about it, but you gotta admit that this is remarkably easy on the eyes yet also easy to follow: parts = version_string.to_s.split(”.”).map(&:to_i) Th
More ›