skolsuper

9 ms·

1. 91.▲
   by skolsuper 10y ago

   SO intentionally does not want to integrate payment of any kind for answerers because of Motivation Crowding Theory[1], the idea that intrinsic motivations like altruism can be crowded out by extrinsic motivations like profit, which is prob
2. 92.▲
   by skolsuper 10y ago

   I think you're confusing "citizen" with "civilian" there, although I agree neither are the same thing or were ever used in the same way as "consumer". define 'citizen' - > a legally recognized
3. 93.▲
   by skolsuper 10y ago

   Definitely arguable, if git can see the tag is not on the remote yet. The problem is git can't tell if the tag is not on any remote, so just not moving them ever is always the safe choice. This could have been prevented by using &qu
4. 94.▲
   by skolsuper 10y ago

   How recently? Nowadays, Jenkins is looking half-decent again imo. Also, I think you can do literally anything in Jenkins that you can do with a custom tool, without really twisting it out of shape.
5. 95.▲
   by skolsuper 10y ago

   The commit wasn't already pushed though. The problem was with the semantics of a 'tag' in git being immutable, and not being rebased along with the commit and the branch, then getting pushed anyway.
6. 96.▲
   by skolsuper 11y ago

   polish as in shine, not Polish as in Poland