skj

101 ms·

1. 1021.▲
   by skj 13y ago

   Then you realize that they don't owe you anything.
2. 1022.▲
   by skj 13y ago

   I see examples, time and time again, of companies (especially Microsoft) twisting facts to make sound-byte-style comments that make Google look bad. However, I cannot think of a single example where Google has done that about any company. C
3. 1023.▲
   by skj 13y ago

   I encourage you to read what is right now the top comment on this page.
4. 1024.▲
   by skj 13y ago

   "There is a serious risk you will say what your interrogator wants to hear rather than the truth." This statement seems entirely plausible to me, but it was in no way implied by the evidence provided. I hate terrible experiments!
5. 1025.▲
   by skj 13y ago

   Nope.
6. 1026.▲
   by skj 13y ago

   I see no fundamental difference.
7. 1027.▲
   by skj 13y ago

   Anything that is about "you" rather than about "code" should be in configuration or input parameters, instead of the code. Don't get me wrong, it's inconvenient sometimes, so people will skip it and get caught,
8. 1028.▲
   by skj 13y ago

   The person they're sending it to could also publish it on the front page of the New York Times. This issue is about what the receiver wants to do with the email, so by using gmail, or forwarding to gmail, the receiver is opting to have