Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
skilled
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
45 ms
·
811.
▲
by
skilled
3y ago
BBC scraping the bottom of the barrel with that title. Also, who cares that he is back? I never see any of this political garbage on my feed because the only people I follow are things that are interesting to me. I actually do follow Elon M
812.
▲
by
skilled
3y ago
dupe, https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38598565
813.
▲
by
skilled
3y ago
Source, https://blog.sonatype.com/npm-packages-caught-exfiltrating-k...
814.
▲
by
skilled
3y ago
> we've heard all your feedback about GPT4 getting lazier! we haven't updated the model since Nov 11th, and this certainly isn't intentional. model behavior can be unpredictable, and we're looking into fixing it http
815.
▲
Grok cites a violation of "OpenAI Policy" when refusing a prompt
(stackdiary.com)
4 points
by
skilled
3y ago
|
0 comments
816.
▲
Users are turning to reinforcement prompts to fix ChatGPT laziness
(stackdiary.com)
1 points
by
skilled
3y ago
|
0 comments
817.
▲
by
skilled
3y ago
https://nitter.net/paulg/status/1733146138226614465
818.
▲
Vulnerability in Microsoft Edge allows code smuggling
(stackdiary.com)
2 points
by
skilled
3y ago
|
0 comments
819.
▲
by
skilled
3y ago
fake benchmarks, fake stitched together videos, disingenuous charts, no developer API on launch, announcements stuffed with marketing fluff. As soon as I saw that opening paragraph from Sundar and how it was written I knew that Gemini is go
820.
▲
Meta's Ad Data Processing Banned in EU/EEA
(stackdiary.com)
3 points
by
skilled
3y ago
|
0 comments
821.
▲
by
skilled
3y ago
https://archive.is/Ng6ME
822.
▲
How tech giants use money, access to steer academic research
(washingtonpost.com)
5 points
by
skilled
3y ago
|
1 comments
823.
▲
by
skilled
3y ago
I don’t think OpenAI needs to worry. I honestly did not feel a single emotion from Google’s announcement and it’s also clear that they manipulated the benchmarks, which won’t matter to their average user but anyone with a little bit of skin
824.
▲
by
skilled
3y ago
It was a good article, really well designed also. There were a couple submissions for it but sadly none that garnered any discussion.
825.
▲
by
skilled
3y ago
Yup. My guess is they only released it to get usage data over the holiday season.
826.
▲
by
skilled
3y ago
I mean the paper is okay and it will take some time to go through it, but this feels like yet another fluff story that will lose traction by Monday. That’s also to Google’s disadvantage, that they have to follow a lot of internal rules to e
827.
▲
by
skilled
3y ago
GPT-4 had finished training 8 months prior to release.
828.
▲
by
skilled
3y ago
Ongoing, https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38531104
829.
▲
by
skilled
3y ago
I actually don’t think they made the right call and whomever wrote this article, began it by planting a seed in the readers mind that these chimps are killers and will maul people on first contact. Of course that will make you think that th
830.
▲
How Google Search and ranking works
(searchengineland.com)
3 points
by
skilled
3y ago
|
0 comments
831.
▲
by
skilled
3y ago
I can maybe understand the frustration from a “scientific” perspective, but for a lot of these “one prompt papers” - you still need someone to sit down and do the analysis and comparisons. Very few papers focus only on GPT/ChatGPT. Add
832.
▲
Microsoft patents a system to care for your well-being using AI
(stackdiary.com)
1 points
by
skilled
3y ago
|
0 comments
833.
▲
by
skilled
3y ago
https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html > Off-Topic: Most stories about politics, or crime, or sports, or celebrities, unless they're evidence of some interesting new phenomenon. Videos of pratfalls or disa
834.
▲
by
skilled
3y ago
“We can steal people’s copyrighted content but we can’t let you see it for yourself.” Outside of privacy (leaking PII), the above is likely the main reason. Someone could have invested a lump of money to scrape as much as they can and then
835.
▲
by
skilled
3y ago
Not at all. Propaganda as in disinformation, as in that is the title of the Washington Post article.
836.
▲
by
skilled
3y ago
The explanation is in this comment thread: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38519228
837.
▲
by
skilled
3y ago
Would YouTube give him any money to come back? The article suggests he could self-host with some exclusivity rights for subscribers, that could work also. I personally think Joe needs to find a way for people to comment on the pods (if he d
838.
▲
by
skilled
3y ago
The comments were moved from another thread to here since the original submission didn’t have a lot of substance and some people were complaining. A bit of a dilemma in the karma sharing department as that feature is not yet implemented. Bu
839.
▲
by
skilled
3y ago
Decent article on the matter, https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2023/12/04/joan-do... https://archive.is/oKsbi
840.
▲
by
skilled
3y ago
Meh. It only gained traction in early 2022. It’s mostly used in meme format, so I wouldn’t say it is “immensely” popular unless your only source of entertainment is short-form videos. In and of itself it is a meaningless word that only has
More ›