skeledrew

8 ms·

151.
by skeledrew 2mo ago
Well, one has a pretty popular harness.
152.
by skeledrew 2mo ago
> We are making this choice because we cannot be confident that SpaceX will use our technology within our terms of service, based on our experience with Elon Musk's companies violating contracts. > After Musk acquired Twitter, no
153.
by skeledrew 2mo ago
I've been somewhat studying Japanese for... quite a few years now. I have yet to find the "ideal" method, but I know it must be mobile (I'm continually migrating away from sitting in front of my laptop) and something I c
154.
by skeledrew 2mo ago
Nah that's just trash talk (throwing threats back and forth), or illegal (if it becomes seriously physical).
155.
by skeledrew 2mo ago
> unlawfully retaliated Can it be at all lawful to retaliate though?
156.
by skeledrew 2mo ago
I've been recording every statusline output for months now so I can easily get answers to questions like this whenever I wish.
157.
by skeledrew 2mo ago
Are Chinese labs also acquiring and scanning books?
158.
by skeledrew 2mo ago
No need even for "human-level" per se. It just has to be useful enough that it upends the current economic order, which it's already well on the way into doing.
159.
by skeledrew 2mo ago
China plays the capitalism game so it can participate in the global market. The US depends on it as a means to control resource distribution.
160.
by skeledrew 2mo ago
> there's a double standard for american vs chinese AI companies Not really, in a way. Things just cost far more in the US than in China; has pretty much always been the case, far back as I can recall. The Chinese state heavily inve
161.
by skeledrew 2mo ago
Capitalism "needs to win", but there's no way it can without being ruthlessly forced upon people. Heck even forcing it is just delaying the inevitable decline/crash.
162.
by skeledrew 2mo ago
IPFS might be in trouble. Haven't really followed the tech so I have no idea how much of an effect there will be with Shipyard dropping it, but from the number of things I see named in their exit post I'd guess the blast radius is
163.
by skeledrew 2mo ago
Prepping for another C&D I see. The only way something like this can survive is through Tor or similar, fully anonymous and decentralized.
164.
by skeledrew 2mo ago
Shouldn't be using X at all, even via proxy. Should have anticipated this happening eventually :shrugs:.
165.
by skeledrew 2mo ago
> LLMs’ responses to prompts are computed on a different computer with GPU access. Could a malicious LLM gain control of the host machine where its weights are loaded? Needs to read up more on how LLMs work I think. Can't take the a
166.
by skeledrew 2mo ago
I don't look at the writes unless there's something off in the prose or I know my request might be problematic/vague. For the most part the prose is a suitable signal for how well Claude is doing. I really dislike subagents a
167.
by skeledrew 2mo ago
I just had Perplexity check out the Bun code to get an idea of how "comment crazy" it is[0]. Based on the results I'd say it's good signal that Anthropic is pretty aware that Claude loves to comment the non-obvious, and
168.
by skeledrew 2mo ago
Well, if in the future I see a marked decrease of comments along with a distinct drop in agent effectiveness, I'll know where to put the blame.
169.
by skeledrew 2mo ago
> your Chinese vibrator could have a hidden microphone that records everything you say and transmits it to the CCP Could they be that desperate? Wow.
170.
by skeledrew 2mo ago
What would the cause be then? Actually how do you define the concept of "feeling"? Like when someone sees someone they "love", for example, is there more to it than the stimuli leading to the recognition of that person a
171.
by skeledrew 2mo ago
I run Claude Code in auto-mode (or bypass when sandboxed) and still am able to monitor the transcript because - possibly by design - it works slowly enough that I can keep up and usually steer; there's no going "step-by-step"
172.
by skeledrew 2mo ago
Why wouldn't it be deliberate? Do you think it's happening without the Anthropic team's go ahead? Or maybe they aren't aware that it's happening? Yes, I "push back" because an LLM using any means at it&#x2
173.
by skeledrew 2mo ago
There was nothing about causation here. Cause would be stimuli triggering memories, biased by the collective experience from past interactions and... DNA. Far more -ologies than I've studied involved.
174.
by skeledrew 2mo ago
Sounds like a bunch of extra tool calls, and dependence on a hopefully accurate retrieval system. Vs the extra context just being available where it's relevant.
175.
by skeledrew 2mo ago
Not at all. In this case a completely false argument was made, one which was immediately obvious to me because something that I had positive experience with was referenced in an all encompassing negative light.
176.
by skeledrew 2mo ago
If that were the case, the habit would have been trained out of it by the LLM researchers at Anthropic, etc. As for humans... well Idk about you but I'm not reading every line of generated code. I read the live transcript, and only div
177.
by skeledrew 2mo ago
If that happens you do notice that something is off though, and can steer accordingly. Unless you aren't monitoring the agent, which I suspect is the real issue here; people send a prompt, go do whatever else, return and send the next
178.
by skeledrew 2mo ago
Feelings are ultimately electrical patterns in the brain, just like everything else humans experience. And as such they can be manipulated and reproduced in any sufficiently capable brain-substrate. Only a matter of time before machines tha
179.
by skeledrew 2mo ago
Until someone creates a machine that does feel emotions.
180.
by skeledrew 2mo ago
> this is autogenerated And then heavily edited by the author, over several iterations. There is no auto-update to create something similar.

More ›