ska

26 ms·

361.
by ska 3y ago
It's less clear that NUMMI failed to meet Toyota's goals for it.
362.
by ska 3y ago
> roughly parity. There is quite a bit of variability in these things among say G7 or G20 countries. Americans on the whole typically have higher net, higher volatility, lower security, for example. It gets complicated when you try and
363.
by ska 3y ago
> Gen AI and Adobe Firefly are the new rage Gen AI isn't going to solve a number of the problems a system like Figma are used for today - not in this generation or foreseeable next ones. It may be a shiny new ball to chase but it&#
364.
by ska 3y ago
Curious: would you say that's reflective of Adobe's dev culture as a whole? I heard some similar comments coming out of a (claimed?) Lightroom developer about the motivations for that project...
365.
by ska 3y ago
It's the internet, therefore a significant percentage of the strong opinions about any topic will come from people who have little to no experience or competence in the area. Being HN, it probably skews a bit better that average. OT
366.
by ska 3y ago
> You eventually get to a scale where vetting is near impossible. That's a choice, no?
367.
by ska 3y ago
I think you skipped from days to weeks, so you missed a factor of 7…
368.
by ska 3y ago
This lacks imagination, the world is a more complex place than that. At any rate, a) this is not fiduciary duty and b) we hit diminishing returns a while ago.
369.
by ska 3y ago
Good stuff!
370.
by ska 3y ago
That’s not really a big deal in this context. Getting over the 2011 change was a big jump, and basically makes modern c++ usable for many more projects. Lots of toolchains are pretty conservative also, 2017 is pretty new there. And much l
371.
by ska 3y ago
It’s a standard for the use of c++ in critical systems. Basically a guide to techniques and language features you can and can’t use (or how) and still have very predictable/controllable system behavior.
372.
by ska 3y ago
It doesn’t support this version yet, right?
373.
by ska 3y ago
Not super helpful for c++. Note the previous MISRA std. predates “modern” c++, as do some others.
374.
by ska 3y ago
No, fiduciary duty is broader and more subtle than that. Your second statement is categorical enough to be silly. In some cases it is true, but if you think a bit on it you'll soon realized it's not hard to construct cases where
375.
by ska 3y ago
It's not accurate that every company that is acquired is non-viable. For example sometimes it's more about timelines because building your viable business into a different kind of business will take a lot longer than you are up f
376.
by ska 3y ago
It's an interesting area, the 5th is actually really narrow (and of course other jurisdictions have something else). It's not obvious what can be compelled; e.g. it wouldn't seem like a court ordering you to defeat such a me
377.
by ska 3y ago
You are assuming it is sudden on the inside, because it was looks that way from the outside. It usually isn't.
378.
by ska 3y ago
No knowledge of the specifics here, but usually the underlying cause is the same: we are running out of money, the business model doesn't work, and we don't have enough time, ideas or both to try anything else - at least no with a
379.
by ska 3y ago
> the best analogy is a basis change in a vector space: It's closer than an analogy. FT is essentially a map of basis into a dual space, but this dual is non uniquely isomorphic with the original so given an arbitrary choice of iso
380.
by ska 3y ago
This assumes facts not in evidence. Also doesn't seem to reflect a clear grasp of what fiduciary duty is.
381.
by ska 3y ago
Right, but that doesn't cover "and I booby trapped it". Why wouldn't you be open to charges in that case? Obstruction, destruction of evidence, contempt of court - such mechanisms exist in part to cover such cases.
382.
by ska 3y ago
Why is that surprising? The 5th isn't some sort of blanket gotcha, it's just there to curtail abuse.
383.
by ska 3y ago
No. The post represents a misrepresentation or misunderstanding of what fiduciary duty is, but that isn't surprising. It seems to be misapplied or misunderstood in the overwhelming majority of times it comes up in conversation.
384.
by ska 3y ago
The real answer is we don't know yet but it's interesting. To go back to your ax+b example, imagine instead you are fitting a much higher dimensional model, but you don't know how high. ax^n+bx^(n-1) ... where n might be i
385.
by ska 3y ago
> Also know as cost of the chip. As a shorthand for expected retail cost, that is terribly misapplied. Or even for internal cost. The chip would be one line item on the BOM for the entire thing you plan on shipping (but not packaged yet)
386.
by ska 3y ago
April 1st.
387.
by ska 3y ago
check the publication date.
388.
by ska 3y ago
Right, but the idea is to restrict to those financially sophisticated enough not to be taken for a ride. That after all is what the "qualified investor" concept is actually about, you either are sophisticated enough to know bette
389.
by ska 3y ago
github?
390.
by ska 3y ago
Really you are authorizing some amount above what you will need, but only getting charged what you pump. I guess they consider that anyone who is actually going to overrun their card limit isn't too worrisome to annoy. Not so long ago

More ›