sjsdaiuasgdia

6 ms·

61.
by sjsdaiuasgdia 5mo ago
Got it, you don't value the rule of law. We are not the same, you and I.
62.
by sjsdaiuasgdia 5mo ago
The president is using the DoJ to represent him in a civil appeal. The president is creating a slush fund to pay off people who acted violently on his behalf. The president has declared himself and his family immune from IRS investigation i
63.
by sjsdaiuasgdia 5mo ago
The destruction of the last vestiges of rule of law in the United States, an act in which Musk played a substantial role, unfortunately means he will likely not be prosecuted - but make no mistake, he has committed many crimes. And now that
64.
by sjsdaiuasgdia 5mo ago
Great crimes demand significant punishment.
65.
by sjsdaiuasgdia 5mo ago
> Here's a test: Given the opportunity to kill Elon, you probably would. Given that you think Elon is a sociopath or evil incarnate. I'm generally against the death penalty. I'd be fine with just stripping him of his wealt
66.
by sjsdaiuasgdia 5mo ago
This is a false equivalency, and it minimizes the carelessness and maliciousness of how DOGE operated.
67.
by sjsdaiuasgdia 5mo ago
Ok so let's talk about more terrestrial promises. How are robotaxis coming along, versus the promises? How are Optimus robots coming along, versus the promises? How is the 2nd edition Roadster coming along, versus the promises? You nee
68.
by sjsdaiuasgdia 5mo ago
Which is why we should start using 'greed' as the primary way we talk about this sort of person. "Greediest man in the world Elon Musk..." "Captains of Greed" instead of "Captains of Industry" "L
69.
by sjsdaiuasgdia 5mo ago
Yep. My employer has invested billions in Anthropic, and now there is a strong executive mandate for everyone (regardless of role) to use Claude for everything. The one metric that is being tracked per employee is how much our Claude usage
70.
by sjsdaiuasgdia 5mo ago
Dunno about that, somehow Tesla stock doing pretty well despite setting a lot of expectations that haven't materialized.
71.
by sjsdaiuasgdia 5mo ago
Holy shit, how young are you? I guess you did not have the experience of seeing his lying sex pest escapades spread across newspaper and tabloid headlines intermittently through the 80s and 90s like a lot of us did. But sure, no one said aa
72.
by sjsdaiuasgdia 6mo ago
> It is just pure unchecked greed that drives them I'm a fan of an idea I ran across recently. Instead of calling Musk, Bezos, Zuck, Ellison, etc the richest people in the world, we should call them the greediest. "Greediest ma
73.
by sjsdaiuasgdia 6mo ago
You choose not to believe the clear evidence. Trump's been a known sex pest, liar, and cheat since the 80s. He hasn't changed in the decades since.
74.
by sjsdaiuasgdia 6mo ago
Trump is a rapist, per the courts, per Ivana Trump, and per statements of Epstein victims. Trump is the most corrupt president in US history, by a few orders of magnitude. Trump lies continuously, obviously, ridiculously. Hell, how many tim
75.
by sjsdaiuasgdia 6mo ago
Keep drinking that kool-aid. Wow. BTW we haven't even talked about the 100000 other things that make Trump a terrible person. Even if a timeline could be produced that fully exonerates Trump regarding Epstein (it can't), you'
76.
by sjsdaiuasgdia 6mo ago
If I was a rich and powerful person, and my rich friend was running a child sex trafficking ring, I would stop being friends with that person, immediately, once I knew about it. It's extremely clear that Trump did not do that. He conti
77.
by sjsdaiuasgdia 6mo ago
There is zero evidence Trump informed the FBI about Epstein. Trump was Epstein's close friend for many years. There are many photos of Trump partying with Epstein and young women. It is impossible that Trump did not know what Epstein w
78.
by sjsdaiuasgdia 6mo ago
Subject says hour behind, but the text says minute ahead. The text implies the non-connected clocks are in sync with each other, which is curious since connectivity is usually how time syncing would occur. In my experience, non-connected cl
79.
X user tricks Grok into sending them $200k(dexerto.com)
19 points by sjsdaiuasgdia 6mo ago|1 comments
80.
by sjsdaiuasgdia 6mo ago
The comment was made in response to the article. This whole discussion is in the context of the article. You choosing to ignore that doesn't mean everyone else has to let you.
81.
by sjsdaiuasgdia 6mo ago
Some people are asking LLMs what's on the menu of restaurants they are actively sitting in, possibly with a menu on the table in front of them. Some people have a very poor understanding of what LLMs are good for. Some people do see th
82.
by sjsdaiuasgdia 6mo ago
Well, Alex Karp is the current CEO and the one who put that fascist manifesto out recently. Please note that I am not defending Peter Thiel as NOT a fascist. He absolutely is.
83.
by sjsdaiuasgdia 6mo ago
Yes, they're fascist. Or at least Alex Karp is.
84.
by sjsdaiuasgdia 6mo ago
"21. Some cultures have produced vital advances; others remain dysfunctional and regressive. All cultures are now equal. Criticism and value judgments are forbidden. Yet this new dogma glosses over the fact that certain cultures and in
85.
by sjsdaiuasgdia 6mo ago
> profitable work for a set of people I think this is essential to the disagreement in this little part of the discussion. Ending a product line and laying off the people who worked on that product line aligns more to your "profitab
86.
by sjsdaiuasgdia 6mo ago
Enjoy your libertarian hellhole. I prefer to live in a society.
87.
by sjsdaiuasgdia 6mo ago
Alex Karp is a fascist. The whole company should be ended.
88.
by sjsdaiuasgdia 6mo ago
You go to jail for failure to abide by a court order. Which is still distinct from going to jail for your speech. Alex Jones can continue to say whatever he wants, from a criminal perspective. He may be somewhat more aware of the potential
89.
by sjsdaiuasgdia 6mo ago
If he still profits from the behavior, has he really been punished? It has to be bigger than what the business can accept as "just a cost of doing business" or it isn't actually a deterrent.
90.
by sjsdaiuasgdia 6mo ago
You're aware a judge was still involved in the process and agreed to it, right? It's not just the plaintiffs.

More ›