sjbach

13 ms·

1. 31.▲
   by sjbach 16y ago

   I'm a current ITAer working on QPX -- by lines of code, QPX is probably actually split pretty evenly between C++ and Lisp. But accounting for verbosity of C++, the logic is heavily on the Lisp side. I think anyone on my team would conside
2. 32.▲
   by sjbach 16y ago

   Not so. Most of QPX and RES is Lisp.
3. 33.▲
   by sjbach 17y ago

   Oh, and also a version for Emacs: http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/LustyExplorer
4. 34.▲
   by sjbach 17y ago

   I wrote a snappy Ruby-based Vim plugin called LustyExplorer which does fuzzy/flex matching for opening files and switching buffers: http://www.vim.org/scripts/script.php?script_id=1890
5. 35.▲
   Critiquing Clojure(items.sjbach.com)

   60 points by sjbach 17y ago|11 comments
6. 36.▲
   Extensibility in Vim vs. Emacs(items.sjbach.com)

   13 points by sjbach 18y ago|3 comments
7. 37.▲
   Surveying Emacs Lisp(items.sjbach.com)

   3 points by sjbach 18y ago|0 comments
8. 38.▲
   Cool things about Clojure which haven't gotten much play(items.sjbach.com)

   2 points by sjbach 18y ago|0 comments