siva7

44 ms·

961.
by siva7 3y ago
I can't interpret from the charter that the board has the authorisation to destroy the company under the current circumstances: > We are concerned about late-stage AGI development becoming a competitive race without time for adequat
962.
by siva7 3y ago
A board member, Helen Toner, made a borderline narcissistic remark that it would be consistent with the company mission to destroy the company when the leadership confronted the board that their decisions puts the future of the company in d
963.
by siva7 3y ago
The other plausible explanation is that Helen Toner doesn’t care as much about safety as about her personal power and clinging to the seat which gives her importance. Saying it’s for safety is very easy and the obviously popular choice if y
964.
by siva7 3y ago
Interesting that Adam is still on Board. This hints to Helen being the main perpetrator of the drama?
965.
by siva7 3y ago
It will be a really tough one to interpret this as “bad faith” against microsoft when the same could be said about the board of openai and helen toners remark that it’s consistent with its mission to destroy the company she has a seat in. A
966.
by siva7 3y ago
So, what does it think about being unplugged soon?
967.
by siva7 3y ago
You’re still wrong. This has been debunked many times over the last days on HN. The wiki is badly phrased leaving ambiguous interpretations open. Sam was along with Greg (and Musk as a financier) the initial co-founder in 2015, recruiting l
968.
by siva7 3y ago
Right, the twitch guy is still CEO. That makes sense.
969.
by siva7 3y ago
So occultism seems to be a thing with the openai leadership. I’m not sure if i wanna trust anyone anymore an AGI.
970.
by siva7 3y ago
Amazing. Almost everyone resigns and they’re still pushing features. Musk was really on something when he fired almost 2/3 of Twitter.
971.
by siva7 3y ago
You know that any of us here could put this up in a matter of minutes with the help of ChatGPT. There is zero authenticity to such writings. I’m sure some won’t realise this in the heat of debate
972.
by siva7 3y ago
They should show a bit of decency and stand in solidarity with their colleagues at OpenAI
973.
by siva7 3y ago
I guess it hurts less if you can blame ai?
974.
by siva7 3y ago
This isn't poaching in this case.
975.
by siva7 3y ago
> Sam was just there to make sure the machine was well oiled That's a big part of the success of any company. Sam and Greg were responsible for recruiting the team that made it possible and removing the many obstacles those people f
976.
by siva7 3y ago
The only difference: the informer is a respected publication while wired is wired and you're not gonna make it better with a claim and then not follow-up with any kind of evidence. But at this point it could be all fabrication. Journal
977.
by siva7 3y ago
Your argumentation against parent is very fluffy. > Your theory collapses in the slightest amount of scrutiny, if D’Angelo tries to destroy the company due to his own company losing value why would the other 3 board members be on board w
978.
by siva7 3y ago
I'm sure this question can be answered better by the employees themselves and they voted very clearly that they don't want a leadership unter the current board that ousted Sam and Greg. As for why customers care about who the CEO
979.
by siva7 3y ago
This could be counted as a felony against individual board members as there were clear conflict of interests among them with such a merger. I'm sure there will be lawsuits from the investors.
980.
by siva7 3y ago
Rather than putting up a conspiracy theory the much more plausible explanation is that this board evidently pissed off a lot of customers, powerful people in tech and almost all employees of openai.
981.
by siva7 3y ago
If you wanna feedback your app should be accessible without a login wall or at least a demo. A bit more information about the app history would be useful.
982.
by siva7 3y ago
Sure, that's the point of GPTs. It's pretty self-explanatory so not sure what you are asking?
983.
by siva7 3y ago
No, i'm not even sure if you're arguing here in good faith. The next sentence after the one you cited clearly states with examples: "The Product Owner is also accountable for effective Product Backlog management"
984.
by siva7 3y ago
A glossary definition? Try instead with the guide: https://scrumguides.org/scrum-guide.html#product-owner
985.
by siva7 3y ago
> I don't know why the job postings make the backlog the focus of what they're looking for. Because the delivery team is actually expecting a workable product backlog and you're responsible to deliver within your role as a
986.
Key tension was between Sam Altman and Helen Toner(twitter.com)
3 points by siva7 3y ago|0 comments
987.
by siva7 3y ago
Only the desperate would take the job. Nat Friedman and Alex Wang have enough self-respect and are too clever to accept that offer from the board.
988.
by siva7 3y ago
That’s also not the job of a board
989.
by siva7 3y ago
Save your time. This pseudo-journalism is based on three tweets from musk which don't support the clickbait headline.
990.
New OpenAI CEO Has History of Unfiltered Posts, Microsoft Disses(bloomberg.com)
17 points by siva7 3y ago|5 comments

More ›