Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
sio8ohPi
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
17 ms
·
151.
▲
by
sio8ohPi
6y ago
Google will just ban "oompa loompa" to appease them.
152.
▲
by
sio8ohPi
6y ago
People say this every time national id comes up, but I've never seen any evidence for it, and it doesn't sound particularly plausible. The US manages to pass all sorts of legislation that angers fundamentalists. Why is this one in
153.
▲
by
sio8ohPi
6y ago
But they will work without tips. Nobody is making you tip. Why not just pay for your meal and leave?
154.
▲
by
sio8ohPi
6y ago
Why support someone on Patreon? Why tip your waiter?
155.
▲
by
sio8ohPi
6y ago
"This video is definitely true. If it wasn't, Facebook would add their disclaimer."
156.
▲
by
sio8ohPi
6y ago
Dowless appears to have gotten away with a similar scheme in 2014. Moreover, I'm from a state that regularly sees serious voting abnormalities[1]. Everyone knows the elections are rigged and nothing is ever done about it. So no, I don&
157.
▲
by
sio8ohPi
6y ago
Correct, the attacks enabled by ballot harvesting are primarily electoral fraud, not voter fraud. I never said anything about voter fraud; that was a non-sequitur introduced by the parent commenter.
158.
▲
by
sio8ohPi
6y ago
If we're still talking about California, it was legal to drop off a family member's ballot prior to AB 1921. Is there a state that allows vote-by-mail and doesn't allow family members to drop off ballots?
159.
▲
by
sio8ohPi
6y ago
Did you read the linked article? It discusses NC's 2018 9th district election, which was thrown out entirely due to ballot harvesting and tampering. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2018_North_Carolina%27s_9th_co...
160.
▲
by
sio8ohPi
6y ago
To be clear, it is not unconstitutional for the federal government to do so. The contract clause only restrains the states.
161.
▲
by
sio8ohPi
6y ago
Price gouging laws won't generally prevent them from continuing to sell at the price they've been selling at. It's fancy artisanal flour with a story, so they charge twice that for a bag. [1] [1]: https://sturmins
162.
▲
by
sio8ohPi
6y ago
I just paid my credit card bill at 50k down/20k up. It's fine. Took about half an hour, but I'm browsing HN (also throttled) in this tab so it's not too inconvenient. You could also read a book or cook or something.
163.
▲
by
sio8ohPi
6y ago
How much of your business communication goes by USPS, and how much goes by email?
164.
▲
by
sio8ohPi
6y ago
> social security checks, taxes, bills Sounds like we could go to weekly or even bimontly delivery for all of these. > communication with family and friends My grandmother had a telephone growing up deep in rural Kentucky 80 years ago
165.
▲
by
sio8ohPi
6y ago
The post office was important in 1787 to "provide the means of intercourse between the citizens of remote parts of the confederation, on such a regular footing, as must contribute greatly to the convenience of commerce, and to the free
166.
▲
by
sio8ohPi
6y ago
California has jungle primaries. She successfully fended off a serious challenge from De Leon just a couple years ago. Sadly, this is the government we deserve.
167.
▲
by
sio8ohPi
7y ago
Maybe I'm out of touch, but how relevant is ESRB these days? I know Steam has parental controls, but do many parents actually use those? Nothing stops kids from just opening a second steam account and buying gift cards in cash, right?
168.
▲
by
sio8ohPi
7y ago
As I said, I understand the utility of services like certified mail. That seems like the appropriate level of care for most of the mailings you mention. You wouldn't want absentee ballots or passports to be lost, right? Or if my county
169.
▲
by
sio8ohPi
7y ago
It's weird to me to hear comments like this. To me the postal service just seems like a slow email service with no spam filtering. (Sure they can delivery packages, but they're not unique in that regard). I get the utility of cert
170.
▲
by
sio8ohPi
7y ago
I'm not a lawyer, but it's not clear to me that the law does actually support you in that. Quoting the CA supreme court, in Marina Point v Wolfson: > Indeed, the basic rights guaranteed by section 51 would be drastically under
171.
▲
by
sio8ohPi
7y ago
You might look up the recent Comcast v. National Association of African American-Owned Media for how alleged race discrimination against a corporation can happen in practice.
172.
▲
by
sio8ohPi
7y ago
The 9th circuit discusses this briefly at the bottom of page 7 here: http://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2018/06/07/16... > California Courts of Appeal have interpreted this reference
173.
▲
by
sio8ohPi
7y ago
This simply isn't true. See for instance Batra v Wolf et al, among many other examples: https://www.loeb.com/en/insights/publications/2008/04/batra-... > Plaintiff Ravi Batra, a bald, India