singpolyma3

5 ms·

61.
by singpolyma3 2mo ago
A human should be able to take the work and break it up properly during rework though.
62.
by singpolyma3 2mo ago
Ok yes. I suppose it is possible to do worse than brute force, haha
63.
by singpolyma3 2mo ago
Basically every optimization heuristic one might use is technically AI, so yes
64.
by singpolyma3 2mo ago
NP-hard just speaks about the algorithm complexity. The input size of a typical sudoku puzzles so small that even the most naive algorithm can do it quickly.
65.
by singpolyma3 2mo ago
Kind of the point yes
66.
by singpolyma3 2mo ago
I thought you switch to a new company to get promoted
67.
by singpolyma3 2mo ago
It does work. Very well. The code quality, problem solving, and knowledge transfer are all insanely better when pairing properly.
68.
by singpolyma3 2mo ago
I love pairing. It always results it better outcomes than not pairing and I've been saddened by the slow decay of the term to now refer to like "talk to me a bit until I'm unstuck" instead of "both work together and
69.
by singpolyma3 2mo ago
We weren't talking about doctors, but about coders writing utility apps being a different thing than payment processors
70.
by singpolyma3 2mo ago
Then license healthcare systems, payment processors, etc. Not humans
71.
by singpolyma3 2mo ago
This sounds like a terrible idea. Do people need license to draw a picture or write a song? Why would we restrict other creative work in this way?
72.
by singpolyma3 2mo ago
Cold email is a form of advertising, but if your question is do I consider any form of advertising acceptable: sure I do. I don't mind display ads or video ads where there is a quid pro quo etc. But cold outreach (email, calls, door to
73.
by singpolyma3 2mo ago
Correct. Unless a close personal friend
74.
by singpolyma3 2mo ago
I sort of agree. But honesty if you're cold emailing me I don't super care if your a real human or not. It's still not cool. Don't do it.
75.
by singpolyma3 2mo ago
Anything on AP or AT can bridge both ways anyway
76.
by singpolyma3 2mo ago
We already have others running infrastructure as well so if bsky goes away the platform can survive
77.
by singpolyma3 2mo ago
Then follow people producing such content?
78.
by singpolyma3 2mo ago
As if "AI generated content" even exists instead of LLMs being a piece of tooling that is directed by a human author.
79.
by singpolyma3 2mo ago
Literally a slippery slope argument
80.
by singpolyma3 2mo ago
This is simply not true
81.
by singpolyma3 2mo ago
Yeah. It's pretty good. I've seen worse commercial adaptations of this story
82.
by singpolyma3 2mo ago
Also you can literally insert ads into the feed content
83.
by singpolyma3 2mo ago
I mean, never DCA anything that's terrible advice. But still better than what most people do.
84.
by singpolyma3 2mo ago
It's actually almost certainly true just on the basis of basic numbers. Many people who are really actually quite poor (making say under $35k CAD annually for a family of 5) manage to make ends meet and even save a little. So if you ma
85.
by singpolyma3 2mo ago
Even better, don't put it inside that form. If it isn't submit (or clear) the form then the button has no semantic business being parented by the form.
86.
by singpolyma3 2mo ago
What parent the button has shouldn't have any meaningful limit on how you can style it with modern CSS.
87.
by singpolyma3 2mo ago
But there is no semantically valid reason for the button to be in the form if it doesn't submit the form. So move it outside.
88.
by singpolyma3 2mo ago
You can have button actions today by wrapping the button in a form tag. The article even shows this. The implication seems to be somehow that this is no good because what if you're already in a form tag? The answer is to move the two a
89.
by singpolyma3 2mo ago
I don't fully understand the obsession with making less-capable devices and talking about them as though being less capable is a feature by itself.
90.
by singpolyma3 2mo ago
More good reasons to avoid the expensive poison water called milk

More ›