singleshot_

6 ms·

61.
by singleshot_ 5mo ago
That’s why it’s important to have a deadline, but it’s a pretty poor answer to my question. ducking this question is an indication your point - bolstered by an ad hominem attack and an appeal to authority - is meaningless.
62.
by singleshot_ 5mo ago
> The requirement for ballots to merely be postmarked by election day is insane. If my credit card bill is due on June 5, it's due on the 5th, not postmarked What do you reckon your credit card bill (private obligation, governed by
63.
by singleshot_ 5mo ago
If there are thirty companies, and each owns a piece of land, one entity/one vote is pretty clearly observed. If those thirty companies reconfigure their holdings so they each own one thirtieth of each of thirty parcels, under your mod
64.
by singleshot_ 5mo ago
LLM-written emails are too wordy. But maybe people think that’s what a good email is. (Did an LLM write your post?)
65.
by singleshot_ 5mo ago
I apologize for being dismissive. You have read this a little more closely than I have. Do you think Section 9A(3), which more or less says these rules would be construed under one person/entity, one vote would break your plan? I belie
66.
by singleshot_ 5mo ago
This idea is equally wrong for different reasons, but I do have a measure of appreciation for you having abandoned your first intrinsically broken idea upon the first resistance you encountered. Fail fast! Why would thirty companies that ow
67.
by singleshot_ 5mo ago
What would happen if the deed (a contract) was an agreement to violate the law restricting minimum lot sizes and was therefor illegal? It would be void and regardless of recordation, no transfer or subdivision would have occurred.
68.
by singleshot_ 5mo ago
> What is the smallest subplot you can split a parcel into? An acre, here. See your local zoning code or land statutes for minimum lot sizes. Consult agreements that run with the land for additional restrictions.
69.
by singleshot_ 5mo ago
The expensive way is superglue plus a little suction cup to evacuate the air, and a razor blade.
70.
by singleshot_ 5mo ago
> The original 1990's assertion that "information wants to be free" and all that related nonsense never really passed the laugh test. It didn’t even pass the end of the paragraph where the quote originated.
71.
by singleshot_ 5mo ago
I thought information wanted to be expensive because the right information at the right time can change your life...
72.
by singleshot_ 5mo ago
They’re called ethical walls now, for obvious reasons (although the room is still Chinese, for whatever distinction).
73.
by singleshot_ 5mo ago
> I'd be foursquare behind a progressive prosecutor in a major city that ran a tight ship Strongly inclined to hire such a prosecutor. Has this model been successfully deployed in any large U.S. cities? My only experience is watchin
74.
by singleshot_ 5mo ago
Did you know you spelled "unbridled" wrong because you are an idiot?
75.
by singleshot_ 5mo ago
Typically how it works is you pay the taxes assessed, then you sue in Tax Court.
76.
by singleshot_ 5mo ago
You are correct to note that there are two fiduciary duties: the duty of care, and the duty of loyalty. However, you are incorrect to imply I stated the law incorrectly. The duty of care is otherwise known as the duty to be informed. And th
77.
by singleshot_ 5mo ago
(The first person to observe that an LLC has no shareholders gets a lawyer high five).
78.
by singleshot_ 5mo ago
No, what insulates them from fiduciary responsibility is the fact that there is no fiduciary responsibility to shareholders. I’ll say that again: members and/or managers of an LLC, and officers and directors of a corporation owe no f
79.
by singleshot_ 5mo ago
> No paperwork, no contract. Two adults, a legal subject, sufficiently specified, offer, acceptance, consideration, mutual assent… a contract.
80.
by singleshot_ 5mo ago
Article 1 judges in US Tax Court?
81.
by singleshot_ 5mo ago
No. If you talk to an attorney and they take reasonable precautions to maintain the integrity of the confidential attorney client relationship, the privilege is preserved. If not, not preserved.
82.
by singleshot_ 5mo ago
Why do you think this would be less discoverable than hosting your own email server?
83.
by singleshot_ 5mo ago
That is the saying
84.
by singleshot_ 5mo ago
That is not the saying
85.
by singleshot_ 5mo ago
If you take a look at the top twenty five platforms by users I’m sure you will figure out why this is not relevant. Worth noting: in the EU, public carriers are not referred to as common carriers.
86.
by singleshot_ 5mo ago
> They are the ones amplifying and distributing this content, why should they have zero responsibility for it? If LinkedIn started allowing hardcore pornography, many of their advertisers would leave. With that in mind, are you certain L
87.
by singleshot_ 5mo ago
Interactive computer services under CDA 230 are not the same as common carriers and your lack of sophistication on this point implies your suggestion this is “simple to solve” is not coming from a position of wisdom.
88.
by singleshot_ 5mo ago
static*
89.
by singleshot_ 6mo ago
Eve is more of an Excel reskin.
90.
by singleshot_ 6mo ago
An Corp & have a great day

More ›