Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
simultsop
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
61.
▲
by
simultsop
1y ago
I believe these are the last kicks of a dying horse/bird... Why you take this so serious? The world is moving on. Nobody will trust anyone with their freedom of speech, ever. Is this so hard to see? Any centralized solution qucikly imp
62.
▲
by
simultsop
1y ago
Unless they have a linux with some libre office, I fail to see where there is no budget for Excel. Initially you have to keep up with windows licenses then office.
63.
▲
by
simultsop
1y ago
You just might be in the right place. Asking same question, wait until someone will make a directory website to sell access to you to find those forums.
64.
▲
by
simultsop
1y ago
I find it really interesting the amount of effort everyone putting in nagging a bad thing rather than ignoring and working on alternatives. I guess everyone is doing a favor to the bad decision maker. People are attracted to negative phenom
65.
▲
by
simultsop
1y ago
the guy behind a kabuki mask, stole my microbots
66.
▲
by
simultsop
1y ago
There were some additional posts regarding the topic by same guy. https://hachyderm.io/@evanw Innovators like him, are very rare.
67.
▲
by
simultsop
1y ago
maybe an automated bot
68.
▲
by
simultsop
1y ago
It took less than 20 yrs for roomba's, things have to start somewhere.
69.
▲
by
simultsop
1y ago
Isn't the plan of automation to let humans free at any cost? Like it happened with computers and relief from bureaucracy. First printers costed 20k, still there are 20k printers but way more powerful, the first series now are in homes
70.
▲
by
simultsop
1y ago
When or who tells the end of it? To what extent. Don't sanitize just where you live. You will need to keep the entire world clean. It's not fair when it is ok just for you.
71.
▲
by
simultsop
1y ago
that was smooth
72.
▲
by
simultsop
1y ago
We are expecting a moment like when sublime was born. Sidebar map, concurrent cursors, blazing speed. Right now its all monetization at gravity. As if companies are ready to pour software developer salaries in tools. I imagine beginners wil
73.
▲
by
simultsop
1y ago
Ok, humans have sentimental approach to information, we are not machines as you imply. Similar statement in a launch of a volunteer project is considered attack.
74.
▲
by
simultsop
1y ago
You should give some humility lessons...
75.
▲
by
simultsop
1y ago
In an era of constant professional extinction threat, author took risk and motivation to build an entire framework for free. And there is you attacking their ego.
76.
▲
by
simultsop
1y ago
You mean that for toying, personal use or hobby projects, right? Otherwise people get jaw drops or facepalms.
77.
▲
by
simultsop
1y ago
The definition of success remains personal. Employing certain biases, too. Being successful in World Choice and Gameplay is relative, but it is also proportional to the biases.
78.
▲
by
simultsop
1y ago
EU did this long time ago, now they're doing it publicly. It sounded wrong back then, but turns out they were right.
79.
▲
by
simultsop
1y ago
> code is not an asset—it's a liability. Every line must be maintained, debugged, secured, and eventually replaced. The real asset is the business capability that code enables. a must-have principle throughout the entire software en
80.
▲
by
simultsop
1y ago
Back then, all sorts of designs made the web a marvel. Until algorithms kicked in. We stripped the design in favor of machine-understandable information composition. So our thing would be most recommended by AD-pumped services/listings
81.
▲
by
simultsop
1y ago
All people wanted was to give someone a coffee, not a fortune.
82.
▲
by
simultsop
1y ago
I believe everyone starts a thing with ambition: "I will fix the world". They get fixed instead! Unfortunately, "things" begin nicely until it gains major attention. Then it loses most of the nice things.
83.
▲
by
simultsop
1y ago
The idea of a unified computer, resembles also with the idea when iPhone merged, calculator, mp3 player and phone. With ubuntu's try a decade ago, https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/ubuntu-edge#/ it was obvio
84.
▲
by
simultsop
1y ago
In a utopic scenario, yes, you fix type-checking and you can live happily ever after. In an interoperable environment, when additional programming languages/teams are in play, which is very frequent nowadays. You have the problem of ce
85.
▲
by
simultsop
1y ago
We have to do what's best for our benefit.
86.
▲
by
simultsop
1y ago
In a world where everything means everything, fighting ambiguity is not an easy task. Hence the refactoring. > When there's a bug, there's no going back to an older version. This practice is developed by the industry for a reas
87.
▲
by
simultsop
1y ago
Leaking bugs, I believe, do not relate to static typing or dynamic typing; it mostly involves deployment. Your types might match, but you would still leak bugs in dependencies :/ From a CI/CD perspective, you should make sure that
88.
▲
by
simultsop
1y ago
TLDR. The outcome is the same, statically typed or dynamically. In both cases one need to perform refactoring in case of breaking changes.
89.
▲
by
simultsop
1y ago
The branding looks quiet strange and very conflicting with voidzero.dev
90.
▲
by
simultsop
1y ago
Bad. We thought that something would be fixed when they brought them to justice. Everything is on the same pace or even accelerated.
More ›