simon84

5 ms·

31.
by simon84 4mo ago
It's not so much about velocity or quality, both of which LLM do (or will) provide. The real question is about accountability and liability. When a major data leak is going to happen, who will they sue or fire ? That is the value engin
32.
by simon84 4mo ago
I can understand the motivation for CLI-based clients, but the browser built-in network inspector overlaps a lot. There is more to Oproxy with traffic shaping but would it be enough to convince ? Spawning a Docker is easy today but it would
33.
by simon84 4mo ago
Nice I get it now. And from your usage, a natural question is how much effort was put by the AI to find the verified answer ? Did it need to run significantly longer or less that without these constraints ?
34.
by simon84 4mo ago
I'm not sure if the feature is intersection or the use of AI to write it... Polygon intersection is a well known thing. Video games and geographic information systems (topology) do that for decades. Tell me more, what should I look at
35.
by simon84 4mo ago
Can you explain how it passes through firewall and lands on a somewhat listening socket on the remote, without being abused meanwhile ?
36.
by simon84 4mo ago
The most surprising for me is the network continuity. This is nice (I haven't tested it). Now I am more into stateless things for which the server is somewhat expected to fail, so the whole feature of job continuity is not a switch inc
37.
by simon84 4mo ago
I think the hype does not quite cover the use cases it provides. It is not ordinary computing, is applies to a very limited set of problems. The buzz is that it is strong at cracking cryptography, but that's about it with what we have
38.
by simon84 4mo ago
Is the cost of infrastructure and tokens accounted for ? You should add this to your dashboard to be fair.
39.
by simon84 4mo ago
Posting on a Saturday at Middle-of-the-Atlantic-ocean time might not be the best audience catcher
40.
by simon84 4mo ago
About the same feeling here. I guess not everything is about global banking scale. I've tried clever tricks to get AI produce unsupervised stuff and came back from it. The slop and loss of cognitive knowledge about what it did was unco
41.
by simon84 4mo ago
I wish :) The style could have been mine, but it diverges quickly if context is too long. Since I didnt write the content, my brain does not have the same ownership feeling. I think the thought process, doing and undoing makes it yours, in
42.
by simon84 4mo ago
I actually did this once, it was great, it actually added credibility somehow I think. After an article, I told Claude that he can add its own note at the end as the "author" and he shall tell how I promptes him and then give a ho
43.
by simon84 4mo ago
AI is not so good at identifying a writing style by name. Instead I feed it a few articles I wrote and tell it to follow the same style. This gives way better results imho
44.
by simon84 4mo ago
While I second that, Im not convinced that the quality of the content is altered by use (or not) of AI. A click-bait for brainless content will not stick long on the front page anyhow. If legit contributors feel more comfortable with AI r
45.
by simon84 4mo ago
My take is that if you use it for supervized coding then max5 is more than enough. It becomes a bottleneck when using agents that spawns to tackle larger tasks and do random trial and errors to correct itself autonomously. As a dev, underst
46.
by simon84 5mo ago
Are those random people or do you have somewhat categories? I.e. I want to challenge a mechanical engineering idea, not everyone even knows what that is.
47.
by simon84 5mo ago
Rate limit from Cloudflare, so much for moving to EU Stack :/
48.
by simon84 5mo ago
I keep it open in the background, sound helps pretend I'm not alone when remote working. As simple as can be, entirely useless, love it :)
49.
by simon84 5mo ago
Opinionated: I dont get the issue about people (incl. bots) visiting your website, regardless of where they originate from and what url they use. Publishing something online means I want it to be seen. Relying or enforcing Referer or query
50.
by simon84 5mo ago
Actually it was sort of fun to see that the AI started writing comments to itself by gradually explaining what it was trying to do and ways it failed to do it. Then it spent more time appending comments to its own comments rather than writi
51.
by simon84 5mo ago
Personally, i've taken a serious step back from 'unsupervised' vibe-coding. When the codebase is clean and you want some additional fix or small feature, Claude is quite good at mimicking your style and does a pretty good job
52.
by simon84 5mo ago
Link this with the fact that anyone can use any name/email in commits and appear as the legitimate contributor on GitHub and it completes the chain. Love it :)