Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
simbolit
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
31.
▲
by
simbolit
3y ago
Same vibe here.
32.
▲
by
simbolit
3y ago
I don't know how our brains work. If you don't just want to be snarky: I think the difference between acquisition and learning is important, I think the role of instruction might be important, I think the role of practice is impor
33.
▲
by
simbolit
3y ago
Been using these for some weeks: https://civitai.com/search/models?sortBy=models_v5&query=Sli...
34.
▲
by
simbolit
3y ago
What's un-controversial is claims like "There will never be..." are bullshit.
35.
▲
by
simbolit
3y ago
> That they are sensitive to statistical relationships does not discount their ability to understand. The claim is that nothing but sensitivity to statistical relationships somehow leads to an ability to understand? I am not going to bel
36.
▲
by
simbolit
3y ago
>The[re] will never be a successful society.... As I do hold degrees in the field studying this very question, may I kindly ask for your sources? Or, not being greedy here, reasons...?
37.
▲
by
simbolit
3y ago
I couldn't care less about the specific implementation. My parent comment said "LLMs are useless for classification, because they can't give confidence scores". I think i have shown that to be demonstrably false.
38.
▲
by
simbolit
3y ago
The question is not if you can "remember" it. That is not what ownership in personal information is about. The question is whether you can __sell__ the information that I had three double cheese burgers and extra greasy fries to m
39.
▲
by
simbolit
3y ago
As user siminion314 wrote: "If [it] is needed for the service (...) you just ask"
40.
▲
by
simbolit
3y ago
A biometric id system which can only distinguish "clowns" from "non-clowns" and makes a lot of errors with regard to the images of famous billionaires. That is funny. Your example? Not funny at all.
41.
▲
by
simbolit
3y ago
You do not explain why these rules are stupid, much less "the stupidest". Both rules, on first sight, make __a lot__ of sense.
42.
▲
by
simbolit
3y ago
If you want to know how bullshit intellectual "property" is, ask the simple question of who owns the personal information the ad company collected about me? Of course, the ad company owns it, because of their hard intellectual wor
43.
▲
by
simbolit
3y ago
I now see how you can argue that it doesn't protect you, in a very personal meaning of you. Then, is there anything that can protect __you__ from rubber hose cryptanalysis in this sense? If not, what does my parent comment even mean?
44.
▲
by
simbolit
3y ago
I think that is a wrong take. Rubberhose FS does protect you from rubberhose cryptanalysis. That is the point. You can argue, that it over-protects you, which might be just as or even more dangerous, and that is a fair criticism. But I don&
45.
▲
by
simbolit
3y ago
In what sense is a nand chip, a memory controller, and a usb plug, a "computer these days"?
46.
▲
by
simbolit
3y ago
It is a stochastic parrot. The error is deriving human ideas of 'quality' from that. The stochastic parrot might well be better at your job than you are.
47.
▲
by
simbolit
3y ago
Auto Label can do it even with closed-source LLMs: https://www.refuel.ai/blog-posts/labeling-with-confidence Also, your 90% number is a 'plausible-looking hallucination', which is mildly funny.
48.
▲
by
simbolit
3y ago
I agree, the difference isn't large. But my parent was asking for the difference, and I think that is the difference.
49.
▲
by
simbolit
3y ago
The BIG difference is that you have to trust the hardware and the operating system already, and as these are made by apple, you already have to trust them. "Trusting the servers of a non E2E service" is adding another trusted part
50.
▲
by
simbolit
3y ago
Situation 1, Year 1: Rich person has 100, the one hundred poor people have 1. Situation 1, Year 2: Rich person has 150, the one hundred poor people have 1.2 Situation 2, Year 1: Rich person has 100, the one hundred poor people have 1. Situa
51.
▲
by
simbolit
3y ago
The goal of Wikipedia is for every "person on the planet [to be] given free access to the sum of all human knowledge". The community is a means to that end, not the end.
52.
▲
by
simbolit
3y ago
Non-technical as in "the average user isn't a nerd" ? For non-nerd populations, these numbers seem high.
53.
▲
by
simbolit
3y ago
https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna19173330 - Two Red Cross workers killed in Lebanon camp https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2017/02/10/5145078... - six killed in Afghanist
54.
▲
by
simbolit
3y ago
>notice how's no Red Cross or any such presence in the Donbass "The Russian Red Cross (RKK), together with the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), will provide assistance to internally displaced
55.
▲
by
simbolit
3y ago
Firefox rennaissance anyone?
56.
▲
by
simbolit
3y ago
Ireland and Portugal already are together in this time zone, but the UK is with them, which makes good friday sense. Map of Timezones: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/88/World_Ti...
57.
▲
by
simbolit
3y ago
(1) abolishing daylight savings time is great and should have been done years ago. (2) the proposed time zones are really impractical, not necessarily in principle, but in their specific implementation. Germany-Netherlands in different time
58.
▲
by
simbolit
3y ago
What does your food analogy show? We already have a market for books, we can observe the market for books, why do we need a food analogy?
59.
▲
by
simbolit
3y ago
Not really. There are a million novels now, of which 90% is self-published for a reason (no one wants to publish it, because it won't make any money). With a text generator, there are now 10min lion novels, of which 99% won't make
60.
▲
by
simbolit
3y ago
> mediocre but quickly producible content swamped the market I hear stuff like this all the time. It feels odd, given that pulp fiction dimeback "novels" exist for over a century. Some of these series run into several thousand
More ›