sim7c00

26 ms·

481.
by sim7c00 2y ago
well now most people look at pictures of stuff rich ppl on their phones all day. maybe they were ahead of their time :D. wish there were old masters who made pictures of cats. id visit that museum for sure.
482.
by sim7c00 2y ago
you are right dan. its nice to see some info here which is more inline with the reality that syria, lebanon, jordan etc. are all within this wider conflict. there is a lot of history people miss and without that contex its too easy to becom
483.
by sim7c00 2y ago
countries i think don't comit acts of war randomly without annoucement or claim. This in itself would be borderline criminal, though i'm not sure if it's an actual thing noted in the geneva conventions. Those do state that an
484.
by sim7c00 2y ago
well you could swap israel for any foreign nation really. this is public but even friendly countries have been caught hacking eachothers shit.. (belgacom?), so can you trust anyone really? they are talking now about supply chain, but if exp
485.
by sim7c00 2y ago
i am between cyberangle and supplychain. on one hand to target so specific ud think it was cyber angle. some exploit in the protocol to dial the page maybe. on the otherhand... do lithium batteries really explode so violently??
486.
by sim7c00 2y ago
this is why i do like to try and parse shit myself for my own tools, not that thats without risk but i dont share my.code so its untargeted. however, to support a wide variety like this the tools are ok. most code honestly in a pdf will not
487.
by sim7c00 2y ago
wish i knew about this workin support jobs sifting for logs and lines in zip 'support file' packages. very nice!
488.
by sim7c00 2y ago
I see a lot of companies move away from fully remote to hybrid, 2-3 days a week at an office. have you considered that? it might bring more opportunities. Also, if you are a decent engineer as you say, perhaps drop the match of 80% down to
489.
by sim7c00 2y ago
re-inventing the shell, not the wheel. love it!
490.
by sim7c00 2y ago
the amount of effort going into people either: - straightup forgetting to free shit - writing horrible to read code making it impossible to do cleanup or track allocations why try to make c into c++ or rust? those languages already exist.
491.
by sim7c00 2y ago
Though a little cold, you are correct. "fear is the mind killer", and fear of death or not being remembered is ultimately not a positive thing to hold on to whilst being alive. With respect to DanBC, whom I did not have the pleasu
492.
by sim7c00 2y ago
one of the more interesting reads ive had on here so firstly thanks for that! love all the explanations of the intermediate solutions. ive been working lately with graphs to deduce network topologies and finding loops is one of my problems.
493.
by sim7c00 2y ago
it might be interesting to look at some standard for workflows like CACAO to express what a workflow is. that way, workflows can ultimately become shareable between such workflow execution engines, and have common workflow editors. its (in
494.
by sim7c00 2y ago
very cool! now i wanna cam in xterm :'D. very fun project! good job
495.
by sim7c00 2y ago
try clarett interface. it also comes with pre amps which will make your sound less noisy , scarlet preamps are just absolutely terrible. you can debug your daw to see how it uses drivers and make a python module which exposes similar functi
496.
by sim7c00 2y ago
I feel this is kind of obvious. I'd think that research would go into an area exploring other models than an LLM as that has these obvious drawbacks. Another being the sheer computing power needed to train this, even if you had infinit
497.
by sim7c00 2y ago
maybe a hated take but: debugging with symbols is like playing a shooter with aimbot. i don't feel GDB has many issues. you can trace program execution, put breaks, disassemble. what more do you need? I don't think needing symbols
498.
by sim7c00 2y ago
fully agree with dagelf here. me andmy wife share nothing in common but the fact we enjoy eachothers presence. imho its really important to have your own thing. if it all revolves around some external commonality, its bound to fail once tha
499.
by sim7c00 2y ago
maybe they can replace javascript with rust :')
500.
by sim7c00 2y ago
why is this surprising. all such tools hamper learning. if you want to learn, read books, read and write. don't use a spellchecker for ur language exam. no calculator for calculus. pen and paper. how is this going backwards :(
501.
by sim7c00 2y ago
well since it's no longer ok to just suck up anyone's data and train your AI, it will be a new challenge for them to avoid that pitfall. I can imagine it will take some time...
502.
by sim7c00 2y ago
these days, when using the right vis techniques you can easily train something like resnet to find malware. some is even plainly obvious to the eye. some packers and encryption is easy to spot but more subtle patterns a neural network can i
503.
by sim7c00 2y ago
i encourage a lot of people to learn linux but not for programming specifically. some things are easier on windows, others linux i guess. if u need to crack open WSL i'd say learn linux. the cmdline is nice also to learn automations an
504.
by sim7c00 2y ago
curses is well... curses. i try rust now. might also try go, then when those fail go back to C :D
505.
by sim7c00 2y ago
good stuff thanks. even though i dont use go nor bubbletea for my tui app work in progress this had a lot of good insights. might even consider go and bubbletea if i get really stuck :D
506.
by sim7c00 2y ago
i heard the first assembler was written in machine code, then that was used to create compiler. machine code u can just chuck into the cpu. its a little less trivial than assembly because its harder to remember but if u know assembly u can
507.
by sim7c00 2y ago
Silliness can also be beneficial :D. You are a user who 'writes code', and that code 'calls'. or are you using your vocal chords to magically retreive data from an API -> it could happen if you use voice-to-text and h
508.
by sim7c00 2y ago
make good things, shouldn't be based on a sole person's opinion i suppose. I didn't want to elaborate on what that is, but as you pointed out, use standards and conventions, well documented and tested libraries. Don't st
509.
by sim7c00 2y ago
fair point again. i dont think this is the way to go in either case. of your api is easy to clearly document its good. if you struggle with that, a programmer trying to call it will also. regardless of what an LLM makes of it. it seems like
510.
by sim7c00 2y ago
programs call apis.

More ›