silveraxe93

8 ms·

61.
by silveraxe93 3y ago
> Kagi isn't good just because it is good, it is good because it's small enough that nobody really optimizes for ranking high on Kagi. While I think that's like 50% of the story, it's not the only factor. For me what&
62.
by silveraxe93 3y ago
This works out of the box in VSCode? Just open a .py file, then select the snippet of code you want to run and cmd+enter It will open a new REPL for you (using your selected interpreter) the first time, and after that all commands are run i
63.
by silveraxe93 3y ago
Real life with worse graphics + - Ability to reload when you fail - You can choose your gender - Actually, be anything. A dwarf, elf, dog, tall, short, muscled, etc... - Novel physics (magic) - Sooooo much more
64.
by silveraxe93 3y ago
WWI was also arguably when soldiers became helpless. Being deployed meant huddling in a trench waiting for an artillery shell to strike you out of the blue.
65.
by silveraxe93 3y ago
Nope. In order to minimise total loss it needs to be able to generate the whole spectrum of IQ.
66.
by silveraxe93 3y ago
All ~models~ measures are wrong, some are useful. I think this result is really cool, and is another way to measure progress in AI capabilities. I don't think it says much about the absolute position of how "smart" AIs are, b
67.
by silveraxe93 3y ago
I don't get if this is sarcasm or not... Just in case it isn't: This is _exactly_ the argument for Musk's case. The lawyer was hired (and managed) to convince the court this argument is wrong.
68.
by silveraxe93 3y ago
Call it Franz? That way the reference is less on the nose and also has the advantage of being a name for the chatbot.
69.
by silveraxe93 3y ago
The usual argument is: We test developer skill by giving them leetcode problems, but leetcode while requiring programming skill is nothing like a real programmer's job.
70.
by silveraxe93 3y ago
Eh, I wouldn't call it an issue with Bayesian math itself. Just... it's an issue with reality. At least with bayesian math you can make your priors explicit, so we the reader at least have the possibility of disagreeing with it. I
71.
Framework contacts customers after phishing scheme hooks internal spreadsheet(tomshardware.com)
3 points by silveraxe93 3y ago|0 comments
72.
by silveraxe93 3y ago
That's a terrible plot. I have no idea what the x-axis or the circle areas mean.
73.
by silveraxe93 3y ago
They also compare to RLHFed GPT-4, which reduces capabilities, while their model seems to be pre-RLHF. So I'd expect those numbers to be a bit inflated compared to public release.
74.
by silveraxe93 3y ago
That got solved using Deep-Q learning. I think David Silver did loads of work on it? Basically, instead of computing every state value like in normal Q learning. You use a Neural Network to estimate the best value.
75.
by silveraxe93 3y ago
Yeah. GPT-3.5 is useless, 4 is just on the margin of being better than using my old workflow. Definitely worth the money. (Never run into the limit)
76.
by silveraxe93 3y ago
I installed this extension, it made me hate Twitter less by not having to use it. https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/nitter-redire...
77.
by silveraxe93 3y ago
Ah nice. Thanks!
78.
by silveraxe93 3y ago
Could you point me to the part where it says it depends on supercomputer output? I didn't read the paper but the linked post seems to say otherwise? It mentions it used the supercomputer output to impute data during training. But for p
79.
by silveraxe93 3y ago
Right, so as a solution to them having: too much power over our lives, being unaccountable and incompetent. Is: Giving the backing of the state over their actions. Move from being accountable to government to _being_ the government. And the
80.
by silveraxe93 3y ago
Is it really ironic if every time he touches AI it ends up causing the opposite of what he tried to do?
81.
by silveraxe93 3y ago
I didn't see anything in the study (that I also skimmed tbh) that is clearly wrong, which makes me dismiss the results. It's just because I don't think this is evidence enough to change my priors. i.e. My gut tells me this is
82.
by silveraxe93 3y ago
I _highly_ doubt this would replicate. I bet they just leaked test data somehow and won't generalise.
83.
by silveraxe93 3y ago
Completely agree with you. I had amazing friends when I went to the office. I 100% prefer remote working and am not coming back, but I have to recognise that it's not better at absolutely everything. I'm seeing a absurd amount of
84.
by silveraxe93 3y ago
He covers that in the post. If you donate your kidney, you can nominate up to 5 people to be first in line if they (or you) ever need a transplant. Given compatibility concerns, it's probably safer for your family member for you to don
85.
by silveraxe93 3y ago
https://laneless.substack.com/p/the-copenhagen-interpretatio...
86.
by silveraxe93 3y ago
I actually read that one before! Kahneman is overconfident, as we all were before the replication crisis. While most of the psychology field is crumbling and filled with bullshit (even though most people didn't catch on yet). There&#x2
87.
by silveraxe93 3y ago
Damn that's cool. Can we implement a version of System 1 / System 2 [1] thinking with this? From the future work section: > better determining the number of <pause> tokens (perhaps using model confidence) If the number of
88.
by silveraxe93 3y ago
I've had many conversations exactly like yours, literally. To reasonable people being convinced that's normal, and me trying to explain how it's probably a coincidence or ad targeting.
89.
by silveraxe93 3y ago
That's what _you_ and _I_ think. Most conversations I have with non-techy people, they end up saying "Yes" to both.
90.
by silveraxe93 3y ago
If by lowest hanging fruit, you mean in the original sense of: Equally as tasty as higher hanging fruit, but easy to pick because it hasn't been relentlessly exploited yet. Then yeah, I agree.

More ›