sillyfluke

8 ms·

61.
by sillyfluke 4mo ago
The security considerations reference seems to require a sign-in to read. But something tells me it is primarily focused on company security and not the personal security of the employee who does not want their voice data to become company
62.
by sillyfluke 4mo ago
3 in 100 is a lot, yet I have never met anyone in person who disclosed that they are face-blind. Your flock needs to break the stigma and mention it more if possible I guess.
63.
by sillyfluke 4mo ago
As every educated American knows, nothing good ever comes from asking, "What about the twinkie?" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZuwC3ESdwZA
64.
by sillyfluke 4mo ago
That is fine. "Your experience may vary" is the crux of my argument amusingly. You can't have just realized that people are having different experiences using AI, or even that the same person has different experiences when t
65.
by sillyfluke 4mo ago
>No, but the same can be said for your colleagues. That's absolutely false. My collegues don't routinely and confidently invent apis that are not there, or spectacularly and repeatedly misunderstand the purpose of certain funct
66.
by sillyfluke 4mo ago
>Your top coder has guard rails in place to prevent him autonomously going free - right? The parent is implying they would prefer an AI when working in the airline and health industry because it makes less errors. Read the comment again.
67.
by sillyfluke 4mo ago
>I'd still place a bet that the SOA models make _far_ less mistakes than humans. Genuine question: your top coder seems to be producing the most error-free code from your perspective, has the deepest knowledge of the architecture an
68.
by sillyfluke 4mo ago
>a monoculture facilitates easier economic growth The why of this is not explained by you nor the original comment referring to the lack multiculturism, it is simply asserted. That's why the original comment came off as nonsensical.
69.
by sillyfluke 4mo ago
>asserting that AI will botch software might hold more weight with people who have already forgotten how dogshit software was pre-AI. You're responding to an assertion with an assertion. It has been empirically proven that SOTA mode
70.
by sillyfluke 4mo ago
The AI cartel's hope is that the market will stay irrational longer than the naysayers can stay solvent both financially and intellectually. Putting it a different way, it won't matter if the firms who went too deep at the very b
71.
by sillyfluke 4mo ago
In what context did you witness all these cases? It's one thing to know these cases exist because they all have been reported in the news or having made a note of it through separate and unrelated word of mouth interactions, but one p
72.
by sillyfluke 4mo ago
>Why would I consider [maintainence]...Its funny how the default with programming is that the piece of software exists forever. By all means don't consider it if you don't plan on using them for a considerable amount of time, b
73.
by sillyfluke 5mo ago
It's a bit weird when the article in question is predominantly about software development in a professional setting and the top comment is about how some people in thread are disregarding this context and opining unrelatedly about thei
74.
by sillyfluke 5mo ago
I support this take especially since you added the "I don't care if nobody else uses what I make", but you should at least acknowledge what you're talking about is pretty unrelated to the article, as the author's en
75.
by sillyfluke 5mo ago
>I guess I thought this should be obvious People in this thread are talking past and misunderstanding each other and making unrelated points. The point of the response to the top level comment was questioning the conflict of interest in
76.
by sillyfluke 5mo ago
>I never thought I’d see the day when the open source “information wants to be free” crowd is complaining about intellectual property and “stylistic inspiration sources. Please stop pretending to be debating many people when you are resp
77.
by sillyfluke 5mo ago
You and the parent may be talking about two different events. There was an initial release of "binders" to known rightwing influencers in a choreographed photo event. It was a predominantly bullshit release that pissed off the con
78.
by sillyfluke 5mo ago
This is such a bizarre misrepresentation of the author's point that I have to assume in good faith that it's based on a misreading of the post. Otherwise, you are unintentionally proving the author's point by describing (now)
79.
by sillyfluke 5mo ago
If I have an issue with my phone when travelling I usually tell them beforehand and luckily all of them have figured out a workaround thus far.
80.
by sillyfluke 5mo ago
I would suggest slightly adjusting your expectations by factoring in the difference between video training data and text training data. Due to computation and cost limitations, the idea of video training data being polluted with AI video sl
81.
by sillyfluke 5mo ago
Right, but you simply stated but haven't explained why bloat is inevitable in the government except to say there is no market pressure applied in government. Whereas the parent is literally talking about employing people using market r
82.
by sillyfluke 5mo ago
What you wrote has nothing to do with what the parent wrote. >There's no competitive/market pressure on it to naturally cap spending based on value. The parent is specifically claiming gov jobs don't allow for near market
83.
by sillyfluke 5mo ago
This comment is amusing on several levels. It's the "aide", the thing that is accused of being a "veneer" that is the actual provably tanigble object of reality in all of this, and it was this indisputable reality t
84.
by sillyfluke 5mo ago
The 7 billion or more current animal enslavers and devourers of the world would like to have a word, just in case some of have a few choice quotes on the nature of freedom as well.
85.
by sillyfluke 5mo ago
I think you are misunderstanding the parent's comment. >the LLM-generated results were read, understood, and confirmed by the mathematician whose work they built on. The mathematician and the blog author are not the same person (as
86.
by sillyfluke 5mo ago
This has been a feature request since AWS was a thing. >AWS is not built around hobbyist needs Yes, as if no startup teams are tasked to remain within hard spending targets when they're trying to build a POC with technologies that t
87.
by sillyfluke 5mo ago
Now explain why they don't have a killswitch for a user defined spending limit.
88.
by sillyfluke 5mo ago
>But that is not going to happen. I don't think the 8-hour work day was accepted during the industrial revolution because job providers were convinced of productivity gains. It was won due to the leverage the labor unions and worker
89.
by sillyfluke 5mo ago
AI-native should mean those who were born/came-of-age/started learning programming in the era of mature AI. It shouldn't be many people (relatively speaking) at this stage. The term that best suits "people who embrace AI
90.
by sillyfluke 5mo ago
I don't understand. I would assume most people don't think small kids should smoke crack. That doesn't mean that they are automatically in favor of creating a 24/7 survelliance state just to prevent that from happening.

More ›