signatoremo

7 ms·

61.
by signatoremo 5mo ago
Did you ever take Uber in a unfamiliar place? When you're supposed to be at a particular spot but you don't know where that is? When the driver doesn't speak English very well? When both your hands is busy with luggages? When
62.
by signatoremo 5mo ago
So you think China is also idiot [0], or Google [1], [2], or Blue Origin [3]? Do you have aerospace engineering background? what are your arguments? I don't know how all of these turn out to be, but when you keep repeat the same argume
63.
by signatoremo 5mo ago
Kids own their parents their very presence. Each person has their own situation so it isn't my place to give specific advice, but each and everyone should pause for a moment on this day, be thankful that they are alive, and consider to
64.
by signatoremo 5mo ago
It’s the main processor: Apple Inc. has held exploratory discussions about using Intel Corp. and Samsung Electronics Co. to produce the main processors for its devices in the US, a move that would offer a secondary option beyond longtime p
65.
by signatoremo 5mo ago
Why not? They can sell what makes sense for them, like surplus capacity, especially when there are desperate buyers.
66.
by signatoremo 5mo ago
Says who? Oracle spends a lot of money to get ready for AI customers like OpenAI. They aren't there yet. They can't lose money serving what they don't have.
67.
by signatoremo 6mo ago
Did you verify that? What is the miss rate?
68.
by signatoremo 6mo ago
NYC already have a functional mass transit system. Why does any transport discussion on HN become train focus? Why it's so hard to understand there still is the need for other modes of transportation. At the very least, tourists want
69.
by signatoremo 6mo ago
Yet ASML is always cited as a great Europe great achievement, but it's hardly ever mentioned that without American's EUV research and patents, and without Cymer there would be no AMSL as we known of. In all honesty I believe ASML&
70.
by signatoremo 6mo ago
Were you around here ten years ago when that exact argument was regularly regurgitated about Uber? Notice that argument is no longer popular? The point is that losing money isn't a sure sign that a business is doomed. Who knows where O
71.
by signatoremo 6mo ago
"If you don't pay for a product, you are the product". That's always been emphasized on HN threads related to FB, Google, etc. Are LLMs different?
72.
by signatoremo 6mo ago
Cancer except when it’s in the form that I approve such as HN? Where it has all the problems of social media — astroturfing, self promoting, bots, etc.
73.
by signatoremo 6mo ago
I loved Electrek early on. It was a fresh air reporting on everything renewable and EV. Now I consider it the whore of the news. Tesla could do no wrong five years ago. Now everything they touch is a disaster. That especially sucks because
74.
by signatoremo 6mo ago
Personal liability? Are you also against no blame culture that is prevalent in the tech world?
75.
by signatoremo 6mo ago
Since when revenue is meaningless? It’s an indication of market acceptance. Anthropic has one of the most expensive plan, they didn’t undersell other models. Open weight models would otherwise dominate if cost is the only factor. Also, inve
76.
by signatoremo 6mo ago
There are bad products and ones that are never used, just to paraphrase. Every single decision of any business gets derided by some segments of its users. You are free to call out Anthropic for anything you are unhappy about, and you are fr
77.
by signatoremo 6mo ago
That's the lead in industrial robot installed. That lead is understandable because of manufacturing concentration in China. Here are 10 top robot makers, none of them are Chinese (*), and five are Japanese: https://manufactu
78.
by signatoremo 6mo ago
Imagine if it was owned by a government, such as China. What do you think would happen? Even if it was owned by US government, how much content do you think would get purged from the library when someone like Trump got elected? See what hap
79.
by signatoremo 6mo ago
Cite your source. The Guardian stopped accepting ads from the fossil industry 6 years ago - [0] It is convenient to be suspicious against news that isn’t aligned with your views. [0] - https://www.theguardian.com/help/i
80.
by signatoremo 6mo ago
Was electricity regulated in the first decade of its existence?
81.
by signatoremo 6mo ago
It isn’t 10k MRR from day one. It also doesn’t make sense to think “well, now that I’m a big boy let’s move to a fancy stack , even if there is no need for it”
82.
by signatoremo 6mo ago
And the companies such as Google and Nvidia are just happy to trust them and lent their names to Anthropic because? Maybe a big conspiracy?
83.
by signatoremo 6mo ago
13 days ago. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47538795
84.
by signatoremo 6mo ago
Every single time, really? When did they said that the last time? I also don't recall they ever limited their models to selective groups.
85.
by signatoremo 6mo ago
Anthropic stood up to the Pentagon because they were worried of potential abuse of their model. Never before a US company was labeled supply chain risk by the US government. That's a lot of business. Action speaks louder than words. As
86.
by signatoremo 6mo ago
It is a witch hunt with no evidence whatsoever, all based on intuition. It is distraction from the main topic, a topic that enough people find interesting to stay on the top page. What was intellectually interesting has now become a bore fe
87.
by signatoremo 6mo ago
> Coding agents write code that doesn't converge, meaning code that they cannot evolve after a while That's not true, and I'm not sure what that even means. It's totally up to you the human to ensure AI code mergable
88.
by signatoremo 6mo ago
The numbers are certainly audited by their investors. Anthropic isn't foreign to PR talk, but investors know what to look for in their book. They aren't stupid unlike how they are viewed on HN. There are more investment money than
89.
by signatoremo 6mo ago
Sure, but do you consider this specific case a real crime?
90.
by signatoremo 7mo ago
Defense doesn't mean not to start a war. Think about how Vietnam justified their invasion of Cambodia in 1978, or how China started the war with Vietnam the following year, or how Turkey entered Syria, how Pakistan fought the Taliban r

More ›