Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
sigmar
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
61.
▲
by
sigmar
5mo ago
"available to qualifying customers’ security teams on request." Seems they're already expanding access.
62.
▲
by
sigmar
5mo ago
oooph, been a while and I don't remember any of those details. Good excuse for me to re-read it!
63.
▲
by
sigmar
5mo ago
this is cool. My nit pick- aren't the petrova lines curving along the wrong plane? For example, in our solar system the line should start at the sun and should be pointed at where Venus used to be, but then curve towards where Venus is
64.
▲
Mind-Blowing Growth Is About to Propel Anthropic into First Profitable Quarter
(wsj.com)
27 points
by
sigmar
5mo ago
|
9 comments
65.
▲
by
sigmar
5mo ago
The blog post links a pdf that OpenAI put together of nine mathematicians that commented on the proof. Each is quite brief and written in accessible terms (or more accessible terms, at least). https://cdn.openai.com/pdf/
66.
▲
by
sigmar
5mo ago
clearly the employees that tweet the most must also have the best contributions to R&D... </sarcasm>
67.
▲
by
sigmar
5mo ago
>OpenAI’s hiring recently has been much stronger, the guys have actual taste. Can you cite specifics? "I won't speak bad about someone, but also won't speak good about others" resulted in a comment that seems to contr
68.
▲
by
sigmar
5mo ago
uhhhh isn't the most logical explanation that the "exceeding" number is intentionally vague? Just like literally every other number in the CFO's declaration ("spent over $10 billion"... "raise more than $6
69.
▲
by
sigmar
5mo ago
I always assume that people making those comments on HN are trying to convince others to switch to their model. Surely no one actually believes their friend circle is a representative sample of the hundreds of millions of people that use th
70.
▲
by
sigmar
5mo ago
posting my read (since it differs so much from the others')- there's a 'holy war' being waged by people that think LLMs shouldn't do full rewrites of software. There are various reasons people think this (think LLMs
71.
▲
by
sigmar
5mo ago
Really? Maybe my brain is broken but I saw lots of forced analogies and LLM habits. Like where it does an em dash and a short list: "I was getting steak ads everywhere—Instagram, news sites, even in places where ads should not be allow
72.
▲
by
sigmar
5mo ago
ebay started attempting consignment more than ten years ago, but I think lately they only do it for luxury items. Which makes sense to me as a lot of people would just send in junk. https://pages.ebay.com/ebay-consignment&#x
73.
▲
by
sigmar
5mo ago
Neat research. I find figure 11 interesting. The models behave so differently there. imo the benchmark should be named Can_It_Pull_a_CharDet_Bench
74.
▲
by
sigmar
5mo ago
Scrambling? Seems to me xAI built too much capacity (for what they can use in 2026). Does that mean OpenAI built the right amount? I don't see how this proves that just because we see one AI company willing to sell compute. We don'
75.
▲
by
sigmar
5mo ago
I wonder if they hadn't decided to call it a drafter when they named the files and were using assistant internally? google being google...
76.
▲
by
sigmar
5mo ago
for anyone wanting a glossary to explain the naming scheme here: E4B = 4B effective parameters (using per-layer embeddings) E2B = 2B (like above) it = instruction tuned (rlhf and all that jazz) assistant = Multi-token drafters (the new 2x s
77.
▲
by
sigmar
5mo ago
>try them directly on Google AI Edge Gallery for Android or iOS. I'm not seeing any update to the app on my android phone... maybe later today? >We’ve published an in-depth technical explainer I was expected a pdf link, but this
78.
▲
by
sigmar
5mo ago
Moves like this make me wonder- What chance is there that these models are nationalized in the near future? What will happen to the investors/economy in such a scenario?
79.
▲
by
sigmar
5mo ago
I found it here: https://capulcu.noblogs.org/english/
80.
▲
by
sigmar
5mo ago
What specifically is the goal of the pre-release review? Just to patch government systems first? Seems like the government was banning internal use of anthropic's models 2 months ago and now wants exclusive access for some amount of ti
81.
▲
by
sigmar
5mo ago
Study design, data collection, analysis, and peer review take time. O1 came out a little over 1.5 years ago
82.
▲
by
sigmar
5mo ago
>The Guardian needs to raise their bar on what to report and how to give readers full context Should they not report on peer reviewed articles published in Science? or only report published articles that fit your priors?
83.
▲
by
sigmar
5mo ago
>We contend that the amount of time remaining before the arrival of CRQCs still exceeds the amount of time needed to migrate public blockchains to PQC, though the margin for error is increasingly narrow. Therefore, we have offered update
84.
▲
by
sigmar
5mo ago
"That includes gay people like me, who could hardly have admitted under our names to how we lived our lives for most of America’s history, as well as many other groups with minoritarian lifestyles and beliefs. It includes lots of peopl
85.
▲
by
sigmar
5mo ago
>It also quietly insinuates that only people with a certain minority lifestyle would care about privacy or that their privacy is somehow more important than others. It's not. How exactly does their post insinuate that? this comment
86.
▲
by
sigmar
5mo ago
Very tangentially related- Does Rivian put software licenses in the OS UI somewhere? Couldn't find it when I was playing with my friend's car. Seems odd if it is android-based...
87.
▲
by
sigmar
5mo ago
What is the heuristic for who should get the heads up? Should they notify amazon but not google simply because they named amazon linux in the report? Seems to me the answer to my first question gets messy fast.
88.
▲
by
sigmar
6mo ago
>ADB enabled means an adversary can completely own your device and "back it up" by simply plugging it in. each adb host has to be individually white-listed by an unlocked device. also the current behavior is that it auto forget
89.
▲
by
sigmar
6mo ago
This is very much within my areas of interest, but signing an NDA in this area is a lot to ask. I'm hoping someone that gets shown the NDA, but doesn't sign it, would be willing to post more details. Such as: does the NDA just cov
90.
▲
by
sigmar
6mo ago
>allowing the passenger to hit her with the door. the bar is absurdly high if we're blaming the car manufacturer for mistakes human make after the car stops
More ›