sidrag22

5 ms·

31.
by sidrag22 5mo ago
the current state of that 20$ claude plan, despite twice this week them stating better usage. first for "double 5 hour usage", then for 50% overall more usage a week. MAYBE the 50% overall is true, but the double usage during a 5
32.
by sidrag22 5mo ago
iirc yes it did not apply on purchase as well, on the label it is always also explicit about cost if not bought in those quantities(2 for 5 in any quantity is still sometimes the actual offering). I am assuming my memory is correct because
33.
by sidrag22 5mo ago
> What I want is an anti-costco. More like a bodega. Still curated, maybe a larger mark-up, but smaller quantities of everything. Half loaves of bread, small bags of frozen veg, enough sugar or flour to bake just a couple batches. This i
34.
by sidrag22 5mo ago
my workflow allows for about 10 windows being maxed out each week(if this threads claim is true that is now 5 windows), i always use Opus for planning and just have strict rules for delegation when its actually crafting the code. I have a p
35.
by sidrag22 5mo ago
I think the main reason that workflow has not worked for me is because im using an ide version of claude code, which means my main agent isn't a crafted agent and is "stock" sonnet or "stock" opus. I'll likely
36.
by sidrag22 5mo ago
Really feel like the current versions are for sure "good enough". Thats not how market capture is gonna function though and they are gonna keep pushing because the only moat is to stay ahead, so the problems gonna stay strange. at
37.
by sidrag22 5mo ago
weird distinction to make when replying to someone talking about their own personal usage of the weekly limit that is a 7 day window of time.
38.
by sidrag22 5mo ago
I've found with opus 4.6 which im still stubbornly using i can burn about 10% of the weekly within a 5 hour window with my workflow. Mentally i think about the weekly usage in terms of usage per day so about 14% per day which results i
39.
by sidrag22 5mo ago
nah, you're kinda encapsulating what i viewed in my mind: at what level of abstraction can you claim to actually "understand" the code? You're claiming to understand down to the CMOS, but you are failing to even engage w
40.
by sidrag22 6mo ago
you drew it to its most uncharitable conclusion for sure, but ya thats pretty much the point i was making. How deep do i need to understand range() or print() to utilize either, on the slightly less extreme end of the spectrum. But ya, im p
41.
by sidrag22 6mo ago
its an absurd bar if you are being a uncharitable jerk like i was, the layers go deep, and technically i can claim I have never fully grasped any of my code. It is likely just a dumb point to bring up tbh.
42.
by sidrag22 6mo ago
> fully understand every change and every single line of the code. im probably just not being charitable enough to what you mean, but thats an absurd bar that almost nobody conforms to even if its fully handwritten. nothing would get don
43.
by sidrag22 6mo ago
Im locked in for a year of claude pro, I encountered the same issues as you a couple weeks ago, Id get like one solid plan done and really really hope it was a 1 shot because that was legit all i was gonna get out of it for those 5 hours, a
44.
by sidrag22 6mo ago
you could try customer support, that chat bot will happily loop you with some more non answers, but try to make you feel good about those non answers :)
45.
by sidrag22 6mo ago
This test makes perfect sense with their actions the last few weeks, they think they've done enough to transition into the general public and away from devs and our goodwill no longer is something they should be concerned with. Its fun
46.
by sidrag22 6mo ago
gpt allows you to wire their models into other CLI tools, I'm advising everyone I know to lean that direction. Not trying to become hostage to something like claude's ecosystem for the rest of my development career.
47.
by sidrag22 6mo ago
feel like its beyond optimistic on their part, just starting to hear their name be blended with companies desires on job listings, and they are destroying the goodwill of the devs who surely are the main reason their name has landed there.
48.
by sidrag22 6mo ago
they need the devs on board for that to matter, i can get whatever i want done with lesser models already. It is quite literally about just who is not gonna give me the shittiest experience, and at anthropic it sure seems they are determine
49.
by sidrag22 6mo ago
kinda surprised to see this type of take out of someone who participates on this website. I feel like this is the place where I have seen that middle ground surface the most. Just the overall shift in the past year from semi handwaving to
50.
by sidrag22 6mo ago
that usage page is getting really cluttered, really fast. Two months ago, mine was simply a 5 hour usage window, and the extra usage portion. Now its 5 Hour usage, Weekly Usage, Claude Design, Daily Routine Runs, and the Extra Usage portion
51.
by sidrag22 6mo ago
I hesitated 100% when i saw caveman gaining steam, changing something like this absolutely changes the behaviour of the models responses, simply including like a "lmao" or something casual in any reply will change the tone entirel
52.
by sidrag22 6mo ago
I always thought it was a really cool idea to bridge the spotify streaming idea with local style purchasing, so say 10$ a month and the user gets ~3$ per month of that to "buy" media. so it defaults initially to their most played
53.
by sidrag22 6mo ago
I cling a bit to a prompt i sent a while ago about just tossing a chopped pepper into a recipe for baked ziti. I had a recipe that i followed fairly tightly with slight changes to see how they would work out each time. Instead of prompting
54.
by sidrag22 6mo ago
without a doubt yes. I'd encourage you to just try a session on a free chatgpt account, asking questions you think a parent or someone unfamiliar with the space would probably ask. It will not only answer confidently incorrect, but it
55.
by sidrag22 6mo ago
I was "Claude only" for well over a year. Kinda crazy how they seem to be gaining a LOT of public attention the last few months, yet i see this type of sentiment from other devs/myself. for me it started with their opencode d
56.
by sidrag22 6mo ago
I know some people still underestimate these tools, but this is pretty adjacent to telling someone with a 20mile commute to just walk everyday instead.
57.
by sidrag22 6mo ago
When i feel i need to totally turn off, I'll turn on a podcast of something im somewhat interested in, and play a game that commands just a slight amount of attention, and pay a slight amount of attention to both things.
58.
by sidrag22 6mo ago
I agree with your point, its something i kinda didn't really consider how its perversely intertwining itself with the education budget and making itself effectively immune. I still think its a solid demonstration that comparable sport
59.
by sidrag22 6mo ago
I think it read well, perhaps too intimidating for some to get into after the first couple paragraphs, but i think it's pretty much tailored at the audience here. I'm resistant to calling it obviously AI as well, the ideas are wel
60.
by sidrag22 6mo ago
This has me considering law school vs something like, officiating a sport. A foul in basketball, or a balk in baseball are very much just judgement calls by the respective officials, kinda you know it when you see it. You can write down wha

More ›